43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Projected Scenarios for Coastal First Nations’ Fisheries Catch Potential under Climate Change: Management Challenges and Opportunities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies have demonstrated ways in which climate-related shifts in the distributions and relative abundances of marine species are expected to alter the dynamics and catch potential of global fisheries. While these studies assess impacts on large-scale commercial fisheries, few efforts have been made to quantitatively project impacts on small-scale subsistence and commercial fisheries that are economically, socially and culturally important to many coastal communities. This study uses a dynamic bioclimate envelope model to project scenarios of climate-related changes in the relative abundance, distribution and richness of 98 exploited marine fishes and invertebrates of commercial and cultural importance to First Nations in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Declines in abundance are projected for most of the sampled species under both the lower (Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 2.6) and higher (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios (-15.0% to -20.8%, respectively), with poleward range shifts occurring at a median rate of 10.3 to 18.0 km decade -1 by 2050 relative to 2000. While a cumulative decline in catch potential is projected coastwide (-4.5 to -10.7%), estimates suggest a strong positive correlation between the change in relative catch potential and latitude, with First Nations’ territories along the northern and central coasts of British Columbia likely to experience less severe declines than those to the south. Furthermore, a strong negative correlation is projected between latitude and the number of species exhibiting declining abundance. These trends are shown to be robust to alternative species distribution models. This study concludes by discussing corresponding management challenges that are likely to be encountered under climate change, and by highlighting the value of joint-management frameworks and traditional fisheries management approaches that could aid in offsetting impacts and developing site-specific mitigation and adaptation strategies derived from local fishers’ knowledge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Signature of ocean warming in global fisheries catch.

          Marine fishes and invertebrates respond to ocean warming through distribution shifts, generally to higher latitudes and deeper waters. Consequently, fisheries should be affected by 'tropicalization' of catch (increasing dominance of warm-water species). However, a signature of such climate-change effects on global fisheries catch has so far not been detected. Here we report such an index, the mean temperature of the catch (MTC), that is calculated from the average inferred temperature preference of exploited species weighted by their annual catch. Our results show that, after accounting for the effects of fishing and large-scale oceanographic variability, global MTC increased at a rate of 0.19 degrees Celsius per decade between 1970 and 2006, and non-tropical MTC increased at a rate of 0.23 degrees Celsius per decade. In tropical areas, MTC increased initially because of the reduction in the proportion of subtropical species catches, but subsequently stabilized as scope for further tropicalization of communities became limited. Changes in MTC in 52 large marine ecosystems, covering the majority of the world's coastal and shelf areas, are significantly and positively related to regional changes in sea surface temperature. This study shows that ocean warming has already affected global fisheries in the past four decades, highlighting the immediate need to develop adaptation plans to minimize the effect of such warming on the economy and food security of coastal communities, particularly in tropical regions.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Climate change, keystone predation, and biodiversity loss.

            Climate change can affect organisms both directly via physiological stress and indirectly via changing relationships among species. However, we do not fully understand how changing interspecific relationships contribute to community- and ecosystem-level responses to environmental forcing. I used experiments and spatial and temporal comparisons to demonstrate that warming substantially reduces predator-free space on rocky shores. The vertical extent of mussel beds decreased by 51% in 52 years, and reproductive populations of mussels disappeared at several sites. Prey species were able to occupy a hot, extralimital site if predation pressure was experimentally reduced, and local species richness more than doubled as a result. These results suggest that anthropogenic climate change can alter interspecific interactions and produce unexpected changes in species distributions, community structure, and diversity.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Encyclopedia of Life v2: Providing Global Access to Knowledge About Life on Earth

              Abstract The Encyclopedia of Life (EOL, http://eol.org) aims to provide unprecedented global access to a broad range of information about life on Earth. It currently contains 3.5 million distinct pages for taxa and provides content for 1.3 million of those pages. The content is primarily contributed by EOL content partners (providers) that have a more limited geographic, taxonomic or topical scope. EOL aggregates these data and automatically integrates them based on associated scientific names and other classification information. EOL also provides interfaces for curation and direct content addition. All materials in EOL are either in the public domain or licensed under a Creative Commons license. In addition to the web interface, EOL is also accessible through an Application Programming Interface. In this paper, we review recent developments added for Version 2 of the web site and subsequent releases through Version 2.2, which have made EOL more engaging, personal, accessible and internationalizable. We outline the core features and technical architecture of the system. We summarize milestones achieved so far by EOL to present results of the current system implementation and establish benchmarks upon which to judge future improvements. We have shown that it is possible to successfully integrate large amounts of descriptive biodiversity data from diverse sources into a robust, standards-based, dynamic, and scalable infrastructure. Increasing global participation and the emergence of EOL-powered applications demonstrate that EOL is becoming a significant resource for anyone interested in biological diversity.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 January 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 1
                : e0145285
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Changing Ocean Research Unit, Global Fisheries Cluster, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ]UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]NF-UBC Nereus Program, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [4 ]Aboriginal Fisheries Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research, GERMANY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: LVW WWLC YO DAC. Performed the experiments: LVW WWLC MCJ. Analyzed the data: LVW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LVW WWLC MCJ. Wrote the paper: LVW WWLC YO MCJ DAC.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-31625
                10.1371/journal.pone.0145285
                4711888
                26761439
                f40cf70d-b517-4fba-8d00-f2d44340a005
                © 2016 Weatherdon et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 18 July 2015
                : 1 December 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 3, Pages: 28
                Funding
                This study was funded by a Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada ( http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/; #766-2013-0832; LVW), a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ( http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/; #22R68146; WWLC), and financial support from the NF-UBC Nereus Program ( http://www.nereusprogram.org/; YO WWLC LVW). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                The species’ data used are available from FishBase ( http://www.fishbase.org), SeaLifeBase ( http://www.sealifebase.org) and OBIS ( http://www.iobis.org/), and, where absent, were obtained from similar taxa within these databases or from the literature. The Dynamic Bioclimate Envelope Model's algorithm can be obtained from the following papers: • Cheung, W.W.L., Lam, V.W., Pauly D. (2008). Dynamic bioclimate envelope model to predict climate-induced changes in distribution of marine fishes and invertebrates. In: Cheung, W.W.L., Lam, V.W.Y, Pauly, D. (Eds.), Modelling present and climate-shifted distributed of marine fishes and invertebrates, vol. 163. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia: Fisheries Centre Research Reports, pp. 5-45. • Cheung, W.W.L., Lam, V.W., Sarmiento, J.L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., Pauly, D. (2009). Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish and Fisheries 10, 235-251. The associated environmental data from GFDL’s ESM2M are available from phase 5 of the Climate Modelling Intercomparison Project (CMIP5; http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/availability.html), and please refer to the following papers for the GFDL models: • Dunne, J. P., John, J. G., Adcroft, A. J., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Shevliakova, E., … & Zadeh, N. (2012). GFDL's ESM2 global coupled climate-carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. Journal of Climate, 25(19), 6646-6665. • Dunne, J. P., John, J. G., Shevliakova, E., Stouffer, R. J., Krasting, J. P., Malyshev, S. L., … & Zadeh, N. (2013). GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics*. Journal of Climate, 26(7), 2247-2267. The Maxent model and links to environmental data can be found from Princeton University ( https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/maxent/) and the following papers: • Philips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231-259. • Phillips, S.J., Dudik, M. (2008). Modelling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161-175. The AquaMaps algorithm and environmental data sources are available from the AquaMaps website ( http://www.aquamaps.org/main/fb_book_kreyes_aquamaps_jg.pdf) and the following paper: • Kaschner, K., Watson, R., Trites, A.W., Pauly, D. (2006). Mapping world-wide distributions and marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model. Marine Ecology Progress Series 316, 285-310.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log