10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design

      , ,
      Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite considerable progress in genome- and proteome-based high-throughput screening methods and rational drug design, the number of successful single-target drugs did not increase appreciably during the past decade. Network models suggest that partial inhibition of a surprisingly small number of targets can be more efficient than the complete inhibition of a single target. This and the success stories of multi-target drugs and combinatorial therapies led us to suggest that systematic drug-design strategies should be directed against multiple targets. We propose that the final effect of partial, but multiple, drug actions might often surpass that of complete drug action at a single target. The future success of this novel drug-design paradigm will depend not only on a new generation of computer models to identify the correct multiple targets and their multi-fitting, low-affinity drug candidates but also on more-efficient in vivo testing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
          Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
          Elsevier BV
          01656147
          April 2005
          April 2005
          : 26
          : 4
          : 178-182
          Article
          10.1016/j.tips.2005.02.007
          15808341
          f450b684-9584-4a3b-9640-6de91ec0ed01
          © 2005

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article