13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Relative importance of anthropogenic landscape characteristics for Neotropical frugivores at multiple scales

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.

          We assessed the impacts of anthropogenic threats on 93 protected areas in 22 tropical countries to test the hypothesis that parks are an effective means to protect tropical biodiversity. We found that the majority of parks are successful at stopping land clearing, and to a lesser degree effective at mitigating logging, hunting, fire, and grazing. Park effectiveness correlates with basic management activities such as enforcement, boundary demarcation, and direct compensation to local communities, suggesting that even modest increases in funding would directly increase the ability of parks to protect tropical biodiversity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation.

            Global efforts to reduce tropical deforestation rely heavily on the establishment of protected areas. Measuring the effectiveness of these areas is difficult because the amount of deforestation that would have occurred in the absence of legal protection cannot be directly observed. Conventional methods of evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas can be biased because protection is not randomly assigned and because protection can induce deforestation spillovers (displacement) to neighboring forests. We demonstrate that estimates of effectiveness can be substantially improved by controlling for biases along dimensions that are observable, measuring spatial spillovers, and testing the sensitivity of estimates to potential hidden biases. We apply matching methods to evaluate the impact on deforestation of Costa Rica's renowned protected-area system between 1960 and 1997. We find that protection reduced deforestation: approximately 10% of the protected forests would have been deforested had they not been protected. Conventional approaches to evaluating conservation impact, which fail to control for observable covariates correlated with both protection and deforestation, substantially overestimate avoided deforestation (by over 65%, based on our estimates). We also find that deforestation spillovers from protected to unprotected forests are negligible. Our conclusions are robust to potential hidden bias, as well as to changes in modeling assumptions. Our results show that, with appropriate empirical methods, conservation scientists and policy makers can better understand the relationships between human and natural systems and can use this to guide their attempts to protect critical ecosystem services.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Focal Species: A Multi-Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation. Especies Focales: Una Sombrilla Multiespecifica para Conservar la Naturaleza

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animal Conservation
                Anim Conserv
                Wiley
                13679430
                December 2017
                December 2017
                April 27 2017
                : 20
                : 6
                : 520-531
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Animal Biology; Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Bertrand Russel, 1505, mailbox: 6109 Campinas SP 13083-970 Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Ecology; Institute of Bioscience; UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista; Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC); Rio Claro Brazil
                [3 ]Department of Biology; Universidade de São Paulo; Av. Bandeirante, 3900 Ribeirão Preto SP 14040-901 Brazil
                [4 ]Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; University of Florida; Gainesville, FL 32611-0430 USA
                Article
                10.1111/acv.12346
                f47013da-0388-4ffd-9c6e-2056164d412e
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article