26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Associated With Penicillin Allergy Labels in Electronic Health Records of Children in 2 Large US Pediatric Primary Care Networks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What factors are associated with penicillin allergy labeling in the pediatric primary care setting?

          Findings

          In this birth cohort study of 334 465 children at 90 primary care pediatric practices, non-Hispanic White ethnicity and race was associated with a penicillin allergy label. Most children carrying penicillin allergy labels were labeled before 2 years of age, and many were labeled after receiving 0 or 1 penicillin prescriptions; allergy labeling varied widely across practices.

          Meaning

          These findings raise questions regarding the validity of penicillin allergy labels among pediatric outpatients and highlight the importance of and potential targets for allergy labeling stewardship in this population to help curb unnecessary use of second-line antibiotics.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the epidemiology and factors associated with penicillin allergy labels among pediatric patients across 2 large US pediatric primary care networks.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Penicillin allergy labels influence clinical decision-making, yet most children who are labeled do not have type 1 hypersensitivity allergic reactions and instead have a history of predictable adverse reactions or unspecified illness symptoms while receiving penicillin for viral infections. Studies describing penicillin allergy labeling in the pediatric outpatient setting are lacking.

          Objective

          To describe the epidemiology and factors associated with penicillin allergy labels across 2 large US pediatric primary care networks.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This retrospective, longitudinal birth cohort study was conducted in 90 primary care pediatric practices serving a diverse population of children across Houston, Texas, Austin, Texas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and parts of New Jersey. Participants were children born between January 2010 and June 2020 who had a health care visit in the first 14 days of life and at least 2 additional visits in the first year of life at one of 90 primary care pediatric practices. Censoring criteria were additionally applied to exclude data from children no longer seeking health care in the 90 clinics over time. Statistical analysis was performed from February to May 2021.

          Exposures

          Basic patient demographics, health care utilization, penicillin exposure, and primary clinic location.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Addition of penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record.

          Results

          Among 334 465 children in the birth cohort, 164 173 (49.1%) were female; 72 831 (21.8%) were Hispanic, 59 598 (17.8%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 148 534 (44.4%) were non-Hispanic White; the median (IQR) age at censoring was 3.8 (1.7-6.6) years; 18 015 (5.4%) were labeled as penicillin allergic, but the prevalence of penicillin allergy labeling ranged from 0.9% to 10.2% across practices. Children were labeled at a median (IQR) age of 1.3 (0.9-2.3) years. Non-Hispanic White children were more likely to be labeled compared with non-Hispanic Black children after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.6-1.8]). There were 6797 allergic children (37.7%) labeled after receiving 1 penicillin prescription and 1423 (7.9%) labeled after receiving 0 penicillin prescriptions.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study of more than 330 000 children, penicillin allergy labeling was common and varied widely across practices. Children were labeled early in life, and almost half were labeled after receiving 1 or 0 penicillin prescriptions. These findings raise questions regarding the validity of penicillin allergy labels. Future work exploring the fidelity of and outcomes associated with penicillin allergy–labeling in children is warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

            Evidence-based guidelines for implementation and measurement of antibiotic stewardship interventions in inpatient populations including long-term care were prepared by a multidisciplinary expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. The panel included clinicians and investigators representing internal medicine, emergency medicine, microbiology, critical care, surgery, epidemiology, pharmacy, and adult and pediatric infectious diseases specialties. These recommendations address the best approaches for antibiotic stewardship programs to influence the optimal use of antibiotics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation

              Background The pediatric complex chronic conditions (CCC) classification system, developed in 2000, requires revision to accommodate the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10). To update the CCC classification system, we incorporated ICD-9 diagnostic codes that had been either omitted or incorrectly specified in the original system, and then translated between ICD-9 and ICD-10 using General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs). We further reviewed all codes in the ICD-9 and ICD-10 systems to include both diagnostic and procedural codes indicative of technology dependence or organ transplantation. We applied the provisional CCC version 2 (v2) system to death certificate information and 2 databases of health utilization, reviewed the resulting CCC classifications, and corrected any misclassifications. Finally, we evaluated performance of the CCC v2 system by assessing: 1) the stability of the system between ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes using data which included both ICD-9 codes and ICD-10 codes; 2) the year-to-year stability before and after ICD-10 implementation; and 3) the proportions of patients classified as having a CCC in both the v1 and v2 systems. Results The CCC v2 classification system consists of diagnostic and procedural codes that incorporate a new neonatal CCC category as well as domains of complexity arising from technology dependence or organ transplantation. CCC v2 demonstrated close comparability between ICD-9 and ICD-10 and did not detect significant discontinuity in temporal trends of death in the United States. Compared to the original system, CCC v2 resulted in a 1.0% absolute (10% relative) increase in the number of patients identified as having a CCC in national hospitalization dataset, and a 0.4% absolute (24% relative) increase in a national emergency department dataset. Conclusions The updated CCC v2 system is comprehensive and multidimensional, and provides a necessary update to accommodate widespread implementation of ICD-10.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                14 March 2022
                March 2022
                14 March 2022
                : 5
                : 3
                : e222117
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
                [2 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [3 ]Now with Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Stanford
                [4 ]Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [6 ]Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children’s, Phildelphia
                [7 ]Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: January 19, 2022.
                Published: March 14, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2117
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Taylor MG et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Margaret G. Taylor, MD, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Feigin Center, 1102 Bates Ave, Ste 1120, Houston, TX 77030 ( mgtaylor@ 123456bcm.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Taylor and Joerger had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Taylor and Joerger were co–first authors. Drs Gerber and Palazzi were co–senior authors.
                Concept and design: Taylor, Joerger, Li, Russo, Gerber, Palazzi.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Taylor, Joerger, Li, Scheurer, Palazzi.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Taylor, Joerger, Li, Gerber.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Taylor, Joerger, Li, Scheurer, Russo, Palazzi.
                Statistical analysis: Taylor, Joerger, Li, Scheurer.
                Obtained funding: Joerger.
                Supervision: Russo, Gerber, Palazzi.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Scheurer reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Drs Taylor and Joerger received the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society Antimicrobial Stewardship Grant Award in 2020 for this work. Dr Joerger is supported through a T32 National Institutes of Health Post-Doctoral T32 Pharmacoepidemiology Research Training Grant (#T32GM075766).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Thank you to George Glenn, Adam Witas, and Gee Mathen from the Texas Children’s Hospital for their assistance in data collection and validation. Thank you to Deepthi Gunturi and Hareesh Gunturi from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for their assistance in data collection and validation.
                Article
                zoi220095
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2117
                9907342
                35285918
                f4a6dd7c-c4c5-4323-82eb-b40034f0856d
                Copyright 2022 Taylor MG et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 30 November 2021
                : 19 January 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Allergy

                Comments

                Comment on this article