678
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    16
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Open access to the scientific journal literature

      editorial
      1 ,
      Journal of Biology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          None of the advantages of traditional scientific journals need be sacrificed in order to provide free online access to scientific journal articles. Objections that open access to scientific journal literature requires the sacrifice of peer-review, revenue, copyright protection, or other strengths of traditional journals, are based on misunderstandings.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Biol
          Journal of Biology
          BioMed Central (London )
          1478-5854
          1475-4924
          2002
          18 June 2002
          : 1
          : 1
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Philosophy, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374, USA
          Article
          1475-4924-1-3
          10.1186/1475-4924-1-3
          117246
          12144706
          f4b72839-38b5-4d70-a201-9bf408053626
          Copyright © 2002 BioMed Central Ltd
          History
          Categories
          Comment

          Life sciences
          Life sciences

          Comments

          A must-read and almost historic paper in the field of Open Access. My favorite conclusion reads: "Objections that open access to scientific journal literature requires the sacrifice of peer-review, revenue, copyright protection, or other strengths of traditional journals, are based on misunderstandings." Oh yes, this is so true and for many years, brigades of anti-OA lobbyists have tried to adopt exactly these arguments to destroy the vision of Open Access.

          2015-05-12 21:34 UTC
          +1

          A must-read and almost historic paper in the field of Open Access. My favorite conclusion reads: "Objections that open access to scientific journal literature requires the sacrifice of peer-review, revenue, copyright protection, or other strengths of traditional journals, are based on misunderstandings." Oh yes, this is so true and for many years, brigades of anti-OA lobbyists have tried to adopt exactly these arguments to destroy the vision of Open Access.

          2015-05-12 21:33 UTC
          +1

          Comment on this article