1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An identification of invariants in life history traits of amphibians and reptiles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While many morphological, physiological, and ecological characteristics of organisms scale with body size, some do not change under size transformation. They are called invariant. A recent study recommended five criteria for identifying invariant traits. These are based on that a trait exhibits a unimodal central tendency and varies over a limited range with body mass (type I), or that it does not vary systematically with body mass (type II). We methodologically improved these criteria and then applied them to life history traits of amphibians, Anura, Caudata (eleven traits), and reptiles (eight traits). The numbers of invariant traits identified by criteria differed across amphibian orders and between amphibians and reptiles. Reproductive output (maximum number of reproductive events per year), incubation time, length of larval period, and metamorphosis size were type I and II invariant across amphibians. In both amphibian orders, reproductive output and metamorphosis size were type I and II invariant. In Anura, incubation time and length of larval period and in Caudata, incubation time were further type II invariant. In reptiles, however, only number of clutches per year was invariant (type II). All these differences could reflect that in reptiles body size and in amphibians, Anura, and Caudata metamorphosis (neotenic species go not through it) and the trend toward independence of egg and larval development from water additionally constrained life history evolution. We further demonstrate that all invariance criteria worked for amphibian and reptilian life history traits, although we corroborated some known and identified new limitations to their application.

          Abstract

          While many morphological, physiological, and ecological characteristics of organisms scale with body size, some do not change under body size transformation and they are called invariant. An invariant trait exhibits a unimodal central tendency and varies over a limited range with body mass (type I), or it does not vary systematically with body mass (type II). We methodologically improved these criteria and applied them to life history traits of amphibians, Anura, Caudata (ten traits), and reptiles (eight traits). The numbers of invariant traits identified by different criteria differed across amphibian orders and between amphibians and reptiles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relationships between body size and some life history parameters.

          Patterns in life history phenomena may be demonstrated by examining wide ranges of body weight. Positive relationships exist between adult body size and the clutch size of poikilotherms, litter weight, neonate weight life span, maturation time and, for homeotherms at least, brood or gestation time. The complex of these factors reduces r max in larger animals or, in more physiological terms, r max is set by individual growth rate. Comparison of neonatal production with ingestion and assimilation suggests that larger mammals put proportionately less effort into reproduction. Declining parental investment and longer development times would result if neonatal weight is scaled allometrically to adult weight and neonatal growth rate to neonatal weight. Body size relations represent general ecological theries and therefore hold considerable promise in the development of predictive ecology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life

            Human activities continue to erode the tree of life, requiring us to prioritize research and conservation. Amphibians represent key victims and bellwethers of global change, and the need for action to conserve them is drastically outpacing knowledge. We provide a phylogeny incorporating nearly all extant amphibians (7,238 species). Current amphibian diversity is composed of both older, depauperate lineages and extensive, more recent tropical radiations found in select clades. Frog and salamander diversification increased strongly after the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary, preceded by a potential mass-extinction event in salamanders. Diversification rates of subterranean caecilians varied little over time. Biogeographically, the Afro- and Neotropics harbour a particularly high proportion of Gondwanan relicts, comprising species with high evolutionary distinctiveness (ED). These high-ED species represent a large portion of the branches in the present tree: around 28% of all phylogenetic diversity comes from species in the top 10% of ED. The association between ED and imperilment is weak, but many species with high ED are now imperilled or lack formal threat status, suggesting opportunities for integrating evolutionary position and phylogenetic heritage in addressing the current extinction crisis. By providing a phylogenetic estimate for extant amphibians and identifying their threats and ED, we offer a preliminary basis for a quantitatively informed global approach to conserving the amphibian tree of life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early origin of viviparity and multiple reversions to oviparity in squamate reptiles.

              Viviparity has putatively evolved 115 times in squamates (lizards and snakes), out of only ~ 140 origins in vertebrates, and is apparently related to colder climates and other factors such as body size. Viviparity apparently evolves from oviparity via egg-retention, and such taxa may thus still have the machinery to produce thick-shelled eggs. Parity mode is also associated with variable diversification rates in some groups. We reconstruct ancestral parity modes accounting for state-dependent diversification in a large-scale phylogenetic analysis, and find strong support for an early origin of viviparity at the base of Squamata, and a complex pattern of subsequent transitions. Viviparous lineages have higher rates of speciation and extinction, and greater species turnover through time. Viviparity is associated with lower environmental and body temperatures in lizards and amphisbaenians, but not female mass. These results suggest that parity mode is a labile trait that shifts frequently in response to ecological conditions. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hallmank@uni-mainz.de
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                08 January 2020
                February 2020
                : 10
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v10.3 )
                : 1233-1251
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution – Evolutionary Ecology Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz Mainz Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Konstantin Hallmann, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution – Evolutionary Ecology, Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz, Johann‐Joachim‐Becher‐Weg 13, Mainz, Rhineland‐Palatinate 55128, Germany.

                Email: hallmank@ 123456uni-mainz.de

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-2918
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-487X
                Article
                ECE35978
                10.1002/ece3.5978
                7029084
                f4d9a2b8-e24a-4593-90eb-97ebd8e32cfb
                © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 June 2018
                : 01 December 2019
                : 06 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 19, Words: 15961
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:19.02.2020

                Evolutionary Biology
                allometric regressions,anura,caudata,invariance,isometric variation,reproductive traits

                Comments

                Comment on this article