23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of intra‐ and interspecific variation in predator–prey body size ratios on trophic interaction strengths

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1. Predation is a pervasive force that structures food webs and directly influences ecosystem functioning. The relative body sizes of predators and prey may be an important determinant of interaction strengths. However, studies quantifying the combined influence of intra‐ and interspecific variation in predator–prey body size ratios are lacking.

          2. We use a comparative functional response approach to examine interaction strengths between three size classes of invasive bluegill and largemouth bass toward three scaled size classes of their tilapia prey. We then quantify the influence of intra‐ and interspecific predator–prey body mass ratios on the scaling of attack rates and handling times.

          3. Type II functional responses were displayed by both predators across all predator and prey size classes. Largemouth bass consumed more than bluegill at small and intermediate predator size classes, while large predators of both species were more similar. Small prey were most vulnerable overall; however, differential attack rates among prey were emergent across predator sizes. For both bluegill and largemouth bass, small predators exhibited higher attack rates toward small and intermediate prey sizes, while larger predators exhibited greater attack rates toward large prey. Conversely, handling times increased with prey size, with small bluegill exhibiting particularly low feeding rates toward medium–large prey types. Attack rates for both predators peaked unimodally at intermediate predator–prey body mass ratios, while handling times generally shortened across increasing body mass ratios.

          4. We thus demonstrate effects of body size ratios on predator–prey interaction strengths between key fish species, with attack rates and handling times dependent on the relative sizes of predator–prey participants.

          5. Considerations for intra‐ and interspecific body size ratio effects are critical for predicting the strengths of interactions within ecosystems and may drive differential ecological impacts among invasive species as size ratios shift.

          Abstract

          Body size ratios between consumers and resources are a pervasive factor in ecosystems across habitat types and taxonomic groups, and may alter the strength of trophic interactions. The present study quantifies the influence of predator–prey body size ratios systematically using functional responses, making comparisons at both the intra‐ and interspecific level. Our results suggest that consumer–resource interaction strengths are underpinned by body size, with attack rates peaking at intermediate size ratios, yet differing between predator species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SCARED TO DEATH? THE EFFECTS OF INTIMIDATION AND CONSUMPTION IN PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rossnoelcuthbert@gmail.com
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                01 June 2020
                June 2020
                : 10
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v10.12 )
                : 5946-5962
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] GEOMAR Helmholtz‐Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel Kiel Germany
                [ 2 ] Institute for Global Food Security School of Biological Sciences Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
                [ 3 ] South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity Makhanda South Africa
                [ 4 ] Department of Zoology and Entomology Rhodes University Makhanda South Africa
                [ 5 ] Department of Ecology and Resource Management University of Venda Thohoyandou South Africa
                [ 6 ] Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science Rhodes University Makhanda South Africa
                [ 7 ] DSI/NRF Research Chair in Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity Makhanda South Africa
                [ 8 ] INRAE Aix Marseille University UMR RECOVER Aix‐en‐Provence France
                [ 9 ] Department of Biology East Carolina University Greenville SC USA
                [ 10 ] Institute for Biomedical and Environmental Health Research School of Health and Life Sciences University of the West of Scotland Paisley UK
                [ 11 ] Department of Botany and Zoology Centre for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ross N. Cuthbert, GEOMAR, Helmholtz‐Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

                Email: rossnoelcuthbert@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2770-254X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-7702
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-3296
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4617-3620
                Article
                ECE36332
                10.1002/ece3.6332
                7319243
                32607203
                f4ea764c-2f52-48e0-b302-cbee3605c3ad
                © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 January 2020
                : 07 April 2020
                : 14 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 3, Pages: 17, Words: 10376
                Funding
                Funded by: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100005156;
                Funded by: NRF‐SAIAB Institutional Support system
                Funded by: National Research Foundation (NRF)—South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Innovation (DSI)
                Award ID: UID 77444, 88746
                Award ID: 110507
                Funded by: DSI‐NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
                Funded by: NRF Thuthuka
                Award ID: 117700
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000270;
                Funded by: DSI‐NRF CIB
                Funded by: U.S. National Science Foundation
                Award ID: 1556743
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:26.06.2020

                Evolutionary Biology
                bluegill,context‐dependency,functional response,interaction strength,largemouth bass,piscivory,size‐scaling,tilapia

                Comments

                Comment on this article