29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of teachings on sexuality in Islam on HPV vaccine acceptability in the Middle East and North Africa region

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine is the recommended prevention strategy for viruses-related cancers, but its acceptability remains controversial, primarily because of the relationship between sexual activity and HPV infection. Countries in the Middle East and North Africa are conservative vis-à-vis sexual behaviors, where Islam shapes people’s practices including sexual health, and imposes that sex be carried out within lawful context. Many sexually transmitted infections can be prevented if the rules of Islam are unfailingly applied by Muslims in that region. However, this is not guaranteed and a noticeable shift in the sexual behavior of the youth has been detected, including a drastic increase in unofficial sexual practices, which in the long-term increase HPV incidence and its related diseases. This study examines the available epidemiological data as well as the teachings in Islam’s sacred texts and scholars’ perspectives to describe the tensions that exist in Muslim cultures around sexuality. Understanding their influence and the function of these tensions can help illuminate the factors that contribute to barriers to accepting the vaccine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

          This report summarizes the epidemiology of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, describes the licensed HPV vaccines, provides updated data from clinical trials and postlicensure safety studies, and compiles recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of HPV vaccines. Persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types can cause cervical cancer in women as well as other anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers in women and men. HPV also causes genital warts. Two HPV vaccines are licensed in the United States. Both are composed of type-specific HPV L1 protein, the major capsid protein of HPV. Expression of the L1 protein using recombinant DNA technology produces noninfectious virus-like particles (VLPs). Quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) contains four HPV type-specific VLPs prepared from the L1 proteins of HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. Bivalent HPV vaccine (HPV2) contains two HPV type-specific VLPs prepared from the L1 proteins of HPV 16 and 18. Both vaccines are administered in a 3-dose series. ACIP recommends routine vaccination with HPV4 or HPV2 for females aged 11 or 12 years and with HPV4 for males aged 11 or 12 years. Vaccination also is recommended for females aged 13 through 26 years and for males aged 13 through 21 years who were not vaccinated previously. Males aged 22 through 26 years may be vaccinated. ACIP recommends vaccination of men who have sex with men and immunocompromised persons (including those with HIV infection) through age 26 years if not previously vaccinated. As a compendium of all current recommendations for use of HPV vaccines, information in this report is intended for use by clinicians, vaccination providers, public health officials, and immunization program personnel as a resource. ACIP recommendations are reviewed periodically and are revised as indicated when new information and data become available.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Updated Estimates of Neural Tube Defects Prevented by Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification — United States, 1995–2011

            In 1992, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended that all women capable of becoming pregnant consume 400 μg of folic acid daily to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs) (1). NTDs are major birth defects of the brain and spine that occur early in pregnancy as a result of improper closure of the embryonic neural tube, which can lead to death or varying degrees of disability. The two most common NTDs are anencephaly and spina bifida. Beginning in 1998, the United States mandated fortification of enriched cereal grain products with 140 μg of folic acid per 100 g (2). Immediately after mandatory fortification, the birth prevalence of NTD cases declined. Fortification was estimated to avert approximately 1,000 NTD-affected pregnancies annually (2,3). To provide updated estimates of the birth prevalence of NTDs in the period after introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification (i.e., the post-fortification period), data from 19 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, covering the years 1999–2011, were examined. After the initial decrease, NTD birth prevalence during the post-fortification period has remained relatively stable. The number of births occurring annually without NTDs that would otherwise have been affected is approximately 1,326 (95% confidence interval = 1,122–1,531). Mandatory folic acid fortification remains an effective public health intervention. There remain opportunities for prevention among women with lower folic acid intakes, especially among Hispanic women, to further reduce the prevalence of NTDs in the United States. In August 2014, a total of 19 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States reported to CDC the number of cases of spina bifida (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 741.0 and 741.9) and anencephaly (codes 740.0–740.1) among deliveries occurring during 1995–2011 among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics, as well as all racial/ethnic groups combined. Surveillance programs were grouped by whether they systematically conducted prenatal ascertainment to capture diagnosed cases (eight sites: Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, New York, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, and Utah) or did not (11 sites: Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin). Programs with prenatal ascertainment monitored birth defects among live births, stillbirths, and elective terminations, and included collection of information from prenatal sources, such as prenatal diagnostic facilities. The birth prevalences of spina bifida, anencephaly, and both NTDs combined were estimated as the total number of cases divided by the total number of live births during the pre-fortification (1995–1996) and post-fortification periods (1999–2011). These prevalence estimates were multiplied by the average number of live births in the United States for the selected periods to estimate the annual number of NTD cases nationwide. Prevalence estimates were also calculated by type of surveillance program (i.e., programs with prenatal ascertainment and programs without prenatal ascertainment) and maternal race/ethnicity (i.e., non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic). The estimated annual number of NTDs prevented was calculated as the difference between the estimated annual number during the pre-fortification period and the estimated annual number during the post-fortification period using prevalence estimates from programs with prenatal ascertainment. A decline in NTDs was observed for all three of the racial/ethnic groups examined between the pre-fortification and post-fortification periods (Figure). The post-fortification prevalence has remained relatively stable. During the observed periods, Hispanics consistently had a higher prevalence of NTDs compared with the other racial/ethnic groups, whereas non-Hispanic blacks generally had the lowest prevalence. The birth prevalences of anencephaly and spina bifida during the pre-fortification (1995–1996) and post-fortification periods (biennial from 1999–2008, last 3 years of available data from 2009–2011, and all years from 1999–2011) for programs with and without prenatal ascertainment were estimated. Overall, a 28% reduction in prevalence was observed for anencephaly and spina bifida using data from all participating programs; a greater reduction (35%) was observed among programs with prenatal ascertainment than for programs without prenatal ascertainment (21%) (Table). The prevalence reported for anencephaly from programs with prenatal ascertainment was consistently higher across all racial/ethnic groups than for programs without prenatal ascertainment, whereas the difference in the observed prevalence of spina bifida was not as pronounced between the two types of programs. Based on data from programs that collect prenatal ascertainment information, an updated estimate of the number of births occurring annually without NTDs that would otherwise have been affected is 1,326 (95% confidence interval = 1,122–1,531). Discussion The birth prevalence of NTDs during the post-fortification period has remained relatively stable since the initial reductions observed during 1999–2000, immediately after mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States. The updated estimate of approximately 1,300 NTD-affected births averted annually during the post-fortification period is slightly higher than the previously published estimate (3). Factors that could have helped contribute to the difference include a gradual increase in the number of annual live births in the United States during the post-fortification period and data variations caused by differences in surveillance methodology. The lifetime direct costs for a child with spina bifida are estimated at $560,000, and for anencephaly (a uniformly fatal condition), the estimate is $5,415 (4); multiplying these costs by the NTD case estimates translates to an annual saving in total direct costs of approximately $508 million for the NTD-affected births that were prevented. The reduction in NTD cases during the post-fortification period inversely mirrors the increase in serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations among women of childbearing age in the general population. Fortification led to a decrease in the prevalence of serum folate deficiency from 30% to 1,000 nmol/L were sufficient to substantially attenuate the risk for NTDs at a population level (6). Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1988–2010 (5) and adjusting for assay differences, the estimated mean RBC folate concentration in women aged 15–44 years in the United States is 1,290–1,314 nmol/L, which appears to indicate that for many women of childbearing age, current strategies are preventing a majority of folic acid–sensitive NTDs (5,6). However, almost a quarter (21.6%) of women of childbearing age in the United States still do not have RBC folate concentrations associated with a lower risk for NTDs, and targeted strategies might be needed to achieve RBC folate concentrations >1,000 nmol/L in this group (7). Although a reduction in the birth prevalence of NTDs has been observed for all three of the racial/ethnic groups examined, the prevalence among Hispanics is consistently greater than that among other racial/ethnic groups. Possible reasons could include differences in folic acid consumption and genetic factors affecting the metabolism of folic acid. Fewer Hispanic women (17%) than non-Hispanic white women (30%) report consuming ≥400 μg of folic acid per day through fortified food or supplements (8). A common genetic polymorphism in Hispanics, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase T allele, has been associated with relatively lower plasma folate and RBC folate concentrations compared with those without this polymorphism (9). Persons with this polymorphism have more genetic susceptibility to a folate insufficiency. To target Hispanics who might need additional folic acid intake to prevent NTDs, one strategy under consideration in the United States is to fortify corn masa flour with folic acid at the same level as enriched cereal grain products. Implementation of corn masa flour fortification would likely prevent an additional 40 cases of NTDs annually (10). What is already known on this topic? A decline in the prevalence of neural tube defects (NTDs) was reported during the period immediately after mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States, which translated to approximately 1,000 births occurring annually without anencephaly or spina bifida that would otherwise have been affected. What is added by this report? The prevalence of NTDs during the post-fortification period has remained relatively stable since the initial reduction observed immediately after mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States. Using the observed prevalence estimates of NTDs during 1999–2011, an updated estimate of the number of births occurring annually without NTDs that would otherwise have been affected is 1,300. What are the implications for public health practice? Current fortification efforts should be maintained to prevent folic acid–sensitive NTDs from occurring. There are still opportunities for prevention among women with lower folic acid intakes, especially among Hispanic women, to further reduce the prevalence of NTDs in the United States. The findings in this report are subject to at least one limitation. The prevalence data used in this study might not be generalizable to the entire United States, but only to the extent that NTD prevalence in other states/territories not examined could differ from NTD prevalence in the states/territories represented in this analysis. The initial decline in NTD prevalence reported immediately after mandatory folic acid fortification has been maintained after more than a decade since implementation. Mandatory folic acid fortification remains an effective public health policy intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sociocultural issues in the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccine in low-resource settings.

              (1) To synthesize sociocultural results from diverse populations related to vaccine decision-making, understanding of cervical cancer and its etiology, experience with previous vaccinations, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine concerns, and information needed to foster acceptance; (2) to contextualize findings in light of recent studies; and (3) to discuss implications for communication strategies to facilitate vaccine acceptance. Descriptive qualitative synthesis of sociocultural studies in 4 countries using iterative theme-based analyses. Four developing countries: India, Peru, Uganda, and Vietnam. Criterion-based sample of 252 focus-group discussions and 470 in-depth interviews with children, parents, teachers/administrators, health workers/managers, and community/religious leaders. A knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey was administered to 879 children and 875 parents in Vietnam. We found that vaccine decision-making was primarily done by parents, with children having some role. Understanding of cervical cancer and HPV was limited; however, the gravity of cancer and some symptoms of cervical cancer were recognized. Vaccination and government-sponsored immunization programs were generally supported by respondents. Sentiments toward cervical cancer vaccines were positive, but concerns about quality of delivery, safety, adverse effects, and the effect on fertility were raised. Communities requested comprehensive awareness-raising and health education to address these concerns. Sociocultural studies help elucidate the complexities of introducing a new vaccine from the perspective of children, parents, and communities. Strategies for introducing the HPV vaccine should address community concerns through effective communication, appropriate delivery, and targeted advocacy to make the program locally relevant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Epidemiol Glob Health
                J Epidemiol Glob Health
                JEGH
                Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
                Atlantis Press
                2210-6006
                2210-6014
                2018
                19 February 2018
                : 7
                : Suppl 1
                : S17-S22
                Affiliations
                Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
                Article
                JEGH-7-s17
                10.1016/j.jegh.2018.02.003
                7386444
                29801588
                f4f4197b-4f28-4fe7-8c42-f91d93769d6b
                © 2018 Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 June 2017
                : 22 January 2018
                : 9 February 2018
                Categories
                Article

                human papilloma viruses,human papilloma virus vaccine acceptability,islamic teachings,middle east and north africa region,sexual behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article