46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adult-born granule cells (GCs), a minor population of cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, are highly active during the first few weeks after functional integration into the neuronal network, distinguishing them from less active, older adult-born GCs and the major population of dentate GCs generated developmentally. To ascertain whether young and old GCs perform distinct memory functions, we created a transgenic mouse in which output of old GCs was specifically inhibited while leaving a substantial portion of young GCs intact. These mice exhibited enhanced or normal pattern separation between similar contexts, which was reduced following ablation of young GCs. Furthermore, these mutant mice exhibited deficits in rapid pattern completion. Therefore, pattern separation requires adult-born young GCs but not old GCs, and older GCs contribute to the rapid recall by pattern completion. Our data suggest that as adult-born GCs age, their function switches from pattern separation to rapid pattern completion.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cell
          Cell
          Elsevier BV
          1097-4172
          0092-8674
          Mar 30 2012
          : 149
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Biology, RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
          Article
          S0092-8674(12)00157-2 NIHMS354871
          10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.046
          3319279
          22365813
          f4f443b1-76e4-44f5-8d5f-73f1da40e45e
          Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article