5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characterization of the opinion, knowledge and perception of the training needs of Portuguese nutritionists in relation to genetically modified foods Translated title: Caracterización de la opinión, el conocimiento y la percepción de las necesidades de capacitación de los nutricionistas portugueses en relación con los alimentos genéticamente modificados

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ABSTRACT Introduction Genetically modified (GM) foods have been approved in the European Union. These foods have been questioned for their actual benefits and risks. This is especially relevant in the case of the nutritional dimension, where consumers are confronted with daily decisions about how to best feed their families. Within this complex framework, health professionals are called upon to intervene and respond to the questions on opinion, attitude and science their clients bring in. The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and opinion of nutritionists on the subject of transgenic foods and their perception of training needs. Material and Methods Quantitative research. A questionnaire was applied between March and July 2016, and 248 individuals participated. The variables studied were opinion, knowledge, and training. Descriptive calculations and multiple correspondence analysis were performed to obtain the respondents’ profiles. Results With regard to opinion and knowledge results show that nutritionists are mostly unfavorable to genetically modified foods, even without knowing the technology in detail. They are aware of this illiteracy, which was confirmed by their answers to a number of objective questions about the national reality. Multiple correspondence analysis showed four different nutritionists’ profiles are sufficient to group all participants. These profile types differ in interest and confidence levels relatively to the GM technology. Portuguese nutritionists do not have a unanimous position on GM foods but mostly agree that specific training in this area should take place at the university level. Conclusions This article highlights the different profiles of opinion, knowledge, and training needs of health professionals, nutritionists, in relation to genetically modified foods. Lifelong learning and interdisciplinary training supported by specific research, associations of health professionals and interference in public policies may strengthen attitudes towards the thematic.

          Translated abstract

          RESUMEN Introducción Los alimentos modificados genéticamente (AGM) han sido aprobados en la Unión Europea. Estos alimentos, han sido cuestionados en cuanto a sus beneficios y riesgos reales. Esto es especialmente relevante en el caso de la dimensión nutricional, donde los consumidores se enfrentan a decisiones diarias sobre cómo alimentar mejor a sus familias. En este marco complejo, los profesionales de la salud deben intervenir y responder a las preguntas sobre opinión, actitud y ciencia que tienen sus clientes. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el conocimiento y la opinión de los nutricionistas sobre el tema de los alimentos transgénicos y su percepción de las necesidades de capacitación. Material y Métodos Investigación cuantitava. Se aplicó un cuestionario entre marzo y julio de 2016, y participaron 248 personas. Las variables estudiadas fueron opinión, conocimiento y formación. Se realizaron cálculos descriptivos y análisis de correspondencia múltiple para obtener los perfiles de los encuestados. Resultados Con respecto a la opinión y el conocimiento, los resultados muestran que los nutricionistas son en su mayoría desfavorables a los alimentos modificados genéticamente, incluso sin conocer la tecnología en detalle. Son conscientes de este desconocimiento, que fue confirmado por sus respuestas a una serie de preguntas objetivas sobre la realidad nacional. El análisis de correspondencia múltiple mostró que cuatro diferentes perfiles de los nutricionistas son suficientes para agrupar a todos los participantes. Estos tipos de perfil difieren en niveles de interés y niveles y confianza en relación con la tecnología de AGM. Los nutricionistas portugueses no tienen una posición unánime con respecto a los alimentos transgénicos pero en su mayoría están de acuerdo en que la capacitación específica en esta área debería realizarse a nivel universitario. Conclusiones Este artículo destaca los diferentes perfiles de opinión, conocimiento y formación de profesionales, nutricionistas, en relación con los alimentos modificados genéticamente. El aprendizaje permanente y la formación interdisciplinaria apoyada por investigaciones específicas, asociaciones de profesionales de la salud e interferencia en las políticas públicas pueden fortalecer las actitudes hacia la temática.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

          Jan Lucht (2015)
          A wide gap exists between the rapid acceptance of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation by farmers in many countries and in the global markets for food and feed, and the often-limited acceptance by consumers. This review contrasts the advances of practical applications of agricultural biotechnology with the divergent paths—also affecting the development of virus resistant transgenic crops—of political and regulatory frameworks for GM crops and food in different parts of the world. These have also shaped the different opinions of consumers. Important factors influencing consumer’s attitudes are the perception of risks and benefits, knowledge and trust, and personal values. Recent political and societal developments show a hardening of the negative environment for agricultural biotechnology in Europe, a growing discussion—including calls for labeling of GM food—in the USA, and a careful development in China towards a possible authorization of GM rice that takes the societal discussions into account. New breeding techniques address some consumers’ concerns with transgenic crops, but it is not clear yet how consumers’ attitudes towards them will develop. Discussions about agriculture would be more productive, if they would focus less on technologies, but on common aims and underlying values.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.

            Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been available for commercial purchase since the 1990s, allowing producers to increase crop yields through bioengineering that creates herbicide-resistant and insect-resistant varieties. However, consumer knowledge about GMOs has not increased at the same rate as the adoption of GMO crops. Consumers worldwide are displaying limited understanding, misconceptions, and even unfamiliarity with GMO food products. Many consumers report that they receive information about GMO food products from the media, Internet, and other news sources. These sources may be less reliable than scientific experts whom consumers trust more to present the facts. Although many in the United States support mandatory GMO labeling (similar to current European standards), consumer awareness of current GMO labeling is low. A distinction must also be made between GMO familiarity and scientific understanding, because those who are more familiar with it tend to be more resistant to bioengineering, whereas those with higher scientific knowledge scores tend to have less negative attitudes toward GMOs. This brings to question the relation between scientific literacy, sources of information, and overall consumer knowledge and perception of GMO foods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                renhyd
                Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética
                Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet
                Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética (Pamplona, Navarra, Spain )
                2173-1292
                2174-5145
                December 2019
                : 23
                : 4
                : 261-270
                Affiliations
                [3] Porto orgnameUniversidade do Porto orgdiv1Instituto de Saúde Pública orgdiv2Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia (EPIUnit) Portugal
                [2] Cuiabá orgnameInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso, Campus São Vicente Brasil
                [1] Porto orgnameUniversidade Católica Portuguesa orgdiv1Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina orgdiv2Grupo Escola Superior de Biotecnologia Portugal
                Article
                S2174-51452019000400007 S2174-5145(19)02300400007
                10.14306/renhyd.23.4.758
                f50d4210-1ec3-43a6-84b1-263570ea5e2c

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 05 December 2019
                : 19 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 27, Pages: 10
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Investigations

                Nutricionistas,Food Genetically Modified,Nutritionists,Educación,Conocimiento,Knowledge,Education,Alimentos Modificados Genéticamente

                Comments

                Comment on this article