10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university

      ,
      Scientometrics
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

          The growth rate of scientific publication has been studied from 1907 to 2007 using available data from a number of literature databases, including Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Traditional scientific publishing, that is publication in peer-reviewed journals, is still increasing although there are big differences between fields. There are no indications that the growth rate has decreased in the last 50 years. At the same time publication using new channels, for example conference proceedings, open archives and home pages, is growing fast. The growth rate for SCI up to 2007 is smaller than for comparable databases. This means that SCI was covering a decreasing part of the traditional scientific literature. There are also clear indications that the coverage by SCI is especially low in some of the scientific areas with the highest growth rate, including computer science and engineering sciences. The role of conference proceedings, open access archives and publications published on the net is increasing, especially in scientific fields with high growth rates, but this has only partially been reflected in the databases. The new publication channels challenge the use of the big databases in measurements of scientific productivity or output and of the growth rate of science. Because of the declining coverage and this challenge it is problematic that SCI has been used and is used as the dominant source for science indicators based on publication and citation numbers. The limited data available for social sciences show that the growth rate in SSCI was remarkably low and indicate that the coverage by SSCI was declining over time. National Science Indicators from Thomson Reuters is based solely on SCI, SSCI and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI). Therefore the declining coverage of the citation databases problematizes the use of this source.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Conference Proceedings: not found

            An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Scientometrics
                Scientometrics
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0138-9130
                1588-2861
                December 2017
                October 3 2017
                December 2017
                : 113
                : 3
                : 1551-1571
                Article
                10.1007/s11192-017-2535-3
                f50f89fe-2e57-4125-bd98-8e288470664d
                © 2017

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article