16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Haemoglobin glycation index and risk for diabetes-related complications in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims/hypothesis

          Previous studies have suggested that the haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) can be used as a predictor of diabetes-related complications in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether HGI was a predictor of adverse outcomes of intensive glucose lowering and of diabetes-related complications in general, using data from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial.

          Methods

          We studied participants in the ADVANCE trial with data available for baseline HbA 1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ( n = 11,083). HGI is the difference between observed HbA 1c and HbA 1c predicted from a simple linear regression of HbA 1c on FPG. Using Cox regression, we investigated the association between HGI, both categorised and continuous, and adverse outcomes, considering treatment allocation (intensive or standard glucose control) and compared prediction of HGI and HbA 1c.

          Results

          Intensive glucose control lowered mortality risk in individuals with high HGI only (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.61, 0.91]; p = 0.003), while there was no difference in the effect of intensive treatment on mortality in those with high HbA 1c. Irrespective of treatment allocation, every SD increase in HGI was associated with a significant risk increase of 14–17% for macrovascular and microvascular disease and mortality. However, when adjusted for identical covariates, HbA 1c was a stronger predictor of these outcomes than HGI.

          Conclusions/interpretation

          HGI predicts risk for complications in ADVANCE participants, irrespective of treatment allocation, but no better than HbA 1c. Individuals with high HGI have a lower risk for mortality when on intensive treatment. Given the discordant results and uncertain relevance beyond HbA 1c, clinical use of HGI in type 2 diabetes cannot currently be recommended.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-017-4539-1) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Red cell life span heterogeneity in hematologically normal people is sufficient to alter HbA1c.

          Although red blood cell (RBC) life span is a known determinant of percentage hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), its variation has been considered insufficient to affect clinical decisions in hematologically normal persons. However, an unexplained discordance between HbA1c and other measures of glycemic control can be observed that could be, in part, the result of differences in RBC life span. To explore the hypothesis that variation in RBC life span could alter measured HbA1c sufficiently to explain some of this discordance, we determined RBC life span using a biotin label in 6 people with diabetes and 6 nondiabetic controls. Mean RBC age was calculated from the RBC survival curve for all circulating RBCs and for labeled RBCs at multiple time points as they aged. In addition, HbA1c in magnetically isolated labeled RBCs and in isolated transferrin receptor-positivereticulocytes was used to determine the in vivo synthetic rate of HbA1c. The mean age of circulating RBCs ranged from 39 to 56 days in diabetic subjects and 38 to 60 days in nondiabetic controls. HbA1c synthesis was linear and correlated with mean whole blood HbA1c (R(2) = 0.91). The observed variation in RBC survival was large enough to cause clinically important differences in HbA1c for a given mean blood glucose.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Paget's Disease of the Mandible

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between HbA1c and blood glucose: implications for the diagnosis of diabetes.

              Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used as an index of mean glycemia in diabetes, as a measure of risk for the development of diabetic complications, and as a measure of the quality of diabetes care. In 2010, the American Diabetes Association recommended that HbA1c tests, performed in a laboratory using a method certified by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, be used for the diagnosis of diabetes. Although HbA1c has a number of advantages compared to traditional glucose criteria, it has a number of disadvantages. Hemoglobinopathies, thalassemia syndromes, factors that impact red blood cell survival and red blood cell age, uremia, hyperbilirubinemia, and iron deficiency may alter HbA1c test results as a measure of average glycemia. Recently, racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between HbA1c and blood glucose have also been described. Although the reasons for racial and ethnic differences remain unknown, factors such as differences in red cell survival, extracellular-intracellular glucose balance, and nonglycemic genetic determinants of hemoglobin glycation are being explored as contributors. Until the reasons for these differences are more clearly defined, reliance on HbA1c as the sole, or even preferred, criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes creates the potential for systematic error and misclassification. HbA1c must be used thoughtfully and in combination with traditional glucose criteria when screening for and diagnosing diabetes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.c.vansteen@amc.uva.nl
                Journal
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0012-186X
                1432-0428
                8 January 2018
                8 January 2018
                2018
                : 61
                : 4
                : 780-789
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000084992262, GRID grid.7177.6, Department of Endocrinology, Academic Medical Centre, , University of Amsterdam, ; Postbus 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, The George Institute for Global Health, , University of Sydney, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, GRID grid.21107.35, Department of Epidemiology, , Johns Hopkins University, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2149 7878, GRID grid.410511.0, Department of Endocrinology, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, , Université Paris, ; Paris, France
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9760 5620, GRID grid.1051.5, Diabetes Domain, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0743 2111, GRID grid.410559.c, Centre de Rechercher, , Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), ; Montréal, Québec Canada
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2174 1754, GRID grid.7563.7, Department of Medicine and Surgery, , University of Milan-Bicocca, ; Milan, Italy
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 9530, GRID grid.418224.9, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, ; Milan, Italy
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition and Exercise, , University of Sydney, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2116 3923, GRID grid.451056.3, National Institute of Health Research UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, ; London, UK
                [11 ]Julius Clinical, Zeist, the Netherlands
                [12 ]ISNI 0000000090126352, GRID grid.7692.a, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, , University Medical Centre Utrecht, ; Utrecht, the Netherlands
                Article
                4539
                10.1007/s00125-017-4539-1
                6448976
                29308539
                f5558559-79d5-46bf-b98f-50e63f696fe1
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 4 July 2017
                : 21 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Academic Medical Center (AMC)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                (blood) glucose,cardiovascular complications,diabetes mellitus, type 2,hba1c,hypoglycaemia,mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article