6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Uptake in a Correctional Setting: Cross-sectional Study”

      author-comment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Initial SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Uptake in a Correctional Setting: Cross-sectional Study

          Background The largest outbreaks of COVID-19 in the United States have occurred in correctional facilities, and little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine campaigns among incarcerated people. Objective The aim of this study was to describe a statewide vaccination program among incarcerated people and staff working in a prison setting. Methods Between December 2020 and February 2021, the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) offered the opportunity for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to all correctional staff and sentenced individuals. Two RIDOC public health educators provided education on the vaccine, answered questions, and obtained consent before the vaccine clinic day for the incarcerated group. All staff received information on signing up for vaccines and watched an educational video that was created by the medical director. Additional information regarding vaccine education and resources was sent via email to the entire RIDOC department. Results During this initial campaign, 76.4% (1106/1447) of sentenced individuals and 68.4% (1008/1474) of correctional staff accepted and received the vaccine. Four months after the first vaccine was offered, 77.7% (1124/1447) of the sentenced population and 69.6% (1026/1474) of staff were fully vaccinated. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of vaccine implementation in a carceral setting. Education and communication likely played an important role in mitigating vaccine refusals.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peer Review of “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Uptake in a Correctional Setting: Cross-sectional Study”

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Peer Review of “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Uptake in a Correctional Setting: Cross-sectional Study”

              (2021)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRxMed
                JMIRx Med
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2563-6316
                Jul-Sep 2021
                28 September 2021
                28 September 2021
                : 2
                : 3
                : e31900
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Rhode Island Department of Corrections Cranston, RI United States
                [2 ] Rhode Island Department of Corrections Providence, RI United States
                [3 ] Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence, RI United States
                [4 ] Rhode Island Department of Health Providence, RI United States
                [5 ] Chapel Hill School of Medicine University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Justin Berk justin_berk@ 123456brown.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2865-7464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-4668
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6433-9773
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-5895
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-7841
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-6240
                Article
                v2i3e31900
                10.2196/31900
                10414247
                f5a6cef8-c72d-4044-8228-4922edf44cce
                ©Justin Berk, Matthew Murphy, Kimberly Kane, Philip Chan, Josiah Rich, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 28.09.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 8 July 2021
                : 20 July 2021
                Categories
                Authors' Response to Peer Reviews
                Authors' Response to Peer Reviews

                vaccination,covid-19,incarcerated individuals,correctional facility,public health,pandemic,vaccine,carceral setting,vaccine implementation,correctional staff

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log