14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Psychometric Properties of the Women’s Recovery of Postnatal Perineal Injuries Questionnaire (WRPPIQ)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          A BSTRACT

          Background:

          Recovery of postnatal women with perineal injuries, especially when perineal tear is severe, occurs much later than the healthy women. There is no specific questionnaire to assess the postnatal recovery in these women. The aim of this study was development and psychometric evaluation of a new tool to measure women’s recovery of postnatal perineal injuries questionnaire (WRPPIQ).

          Methods:

          In this validation study, which was conducted based on the method developed by DeVellis (2003), 270 women with postnatal perineal injuries who referred to healthcare centers in Mashhad, Iran, were studied between 2018 and 2020. This method consisted of steps: (1) definition of postnatal recovery based on in-depth qualitative interview with 22 women, (2) generation of an item pool, (3) selection of the Likert scale, (4) review of the initial item pool, (5) inclusion of items from relevant instruments, (6) conducting exploratory factor analysis, (7) evaluation of the items, and (8) optimization of the scale length.

          Results:

          The initially generated item pool consisted of 144 items on a 5-point Likert scale, which reduced to 85 items following face and content validity measurement. The value of the SCVI/Ave was measured 0.901. The conduction of exploratory factor analysis resulted in 33 items and three factors including evidence of wellness, emotional changes as well as independence and support. The Cronbach’s alpha for the three factors was calculated 0.92, 0.80, and 0.83, respectively.

          Conclusion:

          WRPPIQ has validity and reliability to measure the women’s recovery of postnatal perineal injuries in Iran. It is, therefore, recommended that health care providers to assess women’s recovery of postnatal perineal injuries using this newly developed questionnaire.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The qualitative content analysis process.

          This paper is a description of inductive and deductive content analysis. Content analysis is a method that may be used with either qualitative or quantitative data and in an inductive or deductive way. Qualitative content analysis is commonly used in nursing studies but little has been published on the analysis process and many research books generally only provide a short description of this method. When using content analysis, the aim was to build a model to describe the phenomenon in a conceptual form. Both inductive and deductive analysis processes are represented as three main phases: preparation, organizing and reporting. The preparation phase is similar in both approaches. The concepts are derived from the data in inductive content analysis. Deductive content analysis is used when the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge. Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented. A deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s.

            The current article provides a guideline for conducting factor analysis, a technique used to estimate the population-level factor structure underlying the given sample data. First, the distinction between exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) is briefly discussed; along with this discussion, the notion of principal component analysis and why it does not provide a valid substitute of factor analysis is noted. Second, a step-by-step walk-through of conducting factor analysis is illustrated; through these walk-through instructions, various decisions that need to be made in factor analysis are discussed and recommendations provided. Specifically, suggestions for how to carry out preliminary procedures, EFA, and CFA are provided with SPSS and LISREL syntax examples. Finally, some critical issues concerning the appropriate (and not-so-appropriate) use of factor analysis are discussed along with the discussion of recommended practices.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery
                Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery
                International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery
                Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Iran )
                2322-2476
                2322-4835
                October 2020
                : 8
                : 4
                : 311-323
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
                [2 ] Social Determinants of Health Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
                [3 ] Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Robab Latifnejad Roudsari, PhD; Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ebn-Sina Street, Postal code: 91379-13199, Mashhad, Iran . Tel: +98 51 38591511; Fax: +98 51 8597313; Email: latifnejadr@ 123456mums.ac.ir , rlatifnejad@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                IJCBNM-8-4
                10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85610.1279
                7648862
                f5ec977d-989e-4167-9e24-0bdc188f359e
                Copyright: © International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 July 2020
                : 23 August 2020
                : 3 March 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                recovery of function, perineum, postnatal care, questionnaire, validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article