12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How Host Specific Are Herpesviruses? Lessons from Herpesviruses Infecting Wild and Endangered Mammals

      1 , 2 , 2 , 1
      Annual Review of Virology
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Herpesviruses are ubiquitous and can cause disease in all classes of vertebrates but also in animals of lower taxa, including molluscs. It is generally accepted that herpesviruses are primarily species specific, although a species can be infected by different herpesviruses. Species specificity is thought to result from host-virus coevolutionary processes over the long term. Even with this general concept in mind, investigators have recognized interspecies transmission of several members of the Herpesviridae family, often with fatal outcomes in non-definitive hosts—that is, animals that have no or only a limited role in virus transmission. We here summarize herpesvirus infections in wild mammals that in many cases are endangered, in both natural and captive settings. Some infections result from herpesviruses that are endemic in the species that is primarily affected, and some result from herpesviruses that cause fatal disease after infection of non-definitive hosts. We discuss the challenges of such infections in several endangered species in the absence of efficient immunization or therapeutic options.

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses.

          Bats (order Chiroptera, suborders Megachiroptera ["flying foxes"] and Microchiroptera) are abundant, diverse, and geographically widespread. These mammals provide us with resources, but their importance is minimized and many of their populations and species are at risk, even threatened or endangered. Some of their characteristics (food choices, colonial or solitary nature, population structure, ability to fly, seasonal migration and daily movement patterns, torpor and hibernation, life span, roosting behaviors, ability to echolocate, virus susceptibility) make them exquisitely suitable hosts of viruses and other disease agents. Bats of certain species are well recognized as being capable of transmitting rabies virus, but recent observations of outbreaks and epidemics of newly recognized human and livestock diseases caused by viruses transmitted by various megachiropteran and microchiropteran bats have drawn attention anew to these remarkable mammals. This paper summarizes information regarding chiropteran characteristics and information regarding 66 viruses that have been isolated from bats. From these summaries, it is clear that we do not know enough about bat biology; we are doing too little in terms of bat conservation; and there remain a multitude of questions regarding the role of bats in disease emergence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mammal madness: is the mammal tree of life not yet resolved?

            Most molecular phylogenetic studies place all placental mammals into four superordinal groups, Laurasiatheria (e.g. dogs, bats, whales), Euarchontoglires (e.g. humans, rodents, colugos), Xenarthra (e.g. armadillos, anteaters) and Afrotheria (e.g. elephants, sea cows, tenrecs), and estimate that these clades last shared a common ancestor 90–110 million years ago. This phylogeny has provided a framework for numerous functional and comparative studies. Despite the high level of congruence among most molecular studies, questions still remain regarding the position and divergence time of the root of placental mammals, and certain ‘hard nodes’ such as the Laurasiatheria polytomy and Paenungulata that seem impossible to resolve. Here, we explore recent consensus and conflict among mammalian phylogenetic studies and explore the reasons for the remaining conflicts. The question of whether the mammal tree of life is or can be ever resolved is also addressed. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Dating species divergences using rocks and clocks’.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary timescale for the family of mammalian herpesviruses.

              A detailed phylogenetic analysis for mammalian members of the family Herpesviridae, based on molecular sequences is reported. Sets of encoded amino acid sequences were collected for eight well conserved genes that are common to mammalian herpesviruses. Phylogenetic trees were inferred from alignments of these sequence sets using both maximum parsimony and distance methods, and evaluated by bootstrap analysis. In all cases the three recognised subfamilies (Alpha-, Beta- and Gammaherpesvirinae), and major sublineages in each subfamily, were clearly distinguished, but within sublineages some finer details of branching were incompletely resolved. Multiple-gene sets were assembled to give a broadly based tree. The root position of the tree was estimated by assuming a constant molecular clock and also by analysis of one herpesviral gene set (that encoding uracil-DNA glycosylase) using cellular homologues as outgroups. Both procedures placed the root between the Alphaherpesvirinae and the other two subfamilies. Substitution rates were calculated for the combined gene sets based on a previous estimate for alphaherpesviral UL27 genes, where the time base had been obtained according to the hypothesis of cospeciation of virus and host lineages. Assuming a constant molecular clock, it was then estimated that the three subfamilies arose approximately 180 to 220 million years ago, that major sublineages within subfamilies were probably generated before the mammalian radiation of 80 to 60 million years ago, and that speciations within sublineages took place in the last 80 million years, probably with a major component of cospeciation with host lineages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Virology
                Annu. Rev. Virol.
                Annual Reviews
                2327-056X
                2327-0578
                September 29 2018
                September 29 2018
                : 5
                : 1
                : 53-68
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut für Virologie, Zentrum für Infektionsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany;
                [2 ]Department of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), 10315 Berlin, Germany;
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043227
                30052491
                f5ffaf36-88ff-421c-83ec-5bd8ead5c2f7
                © 2018
                History

                Quantitative & Systems biology,Biophysics
                Quantitative & Systems biology, Biophysics

                Comments

                Comment on this article