83
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins: Choosing the Appropriate Host

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Membrane proteins are the targets of 50% of drugs, although they only represent 1% of total cellular proteins. The first major bottleneck on the route to their functional and structural characterisation is their overexpression; and simply choosing the right system can involve many months of trial and error. This work is intended as a guide to where to start when faced with heterologous expression of a membrane protein.

          Methodology/Principal Findings

          The expression of 20 membrane proteins, both peripheral and integral, in three prokaryotic ( E. coli, L. lactis, R. sphaeroides) and three eukaryotic ( A. thaliana, N. benthamiana, Sf9 insect cells) hosts was tested. The proteins tested were of various origins (bacteria, plants and mammals), functions (transporters, receptors, enzymes) and topologies (between 0 and 13 transmembrane segments). The Gateway system was used to clone all 20 genes into appropriate vectors for the hosts to be tested. Culture conditions were optimised for each host, and specific strategies were tested, such as the use of Mistic fusions in E. coli. 17 of the 20 proteins were produced at adequate yields for functional and, in some cases, structural studies. We have formulated general recommendations to assist with choosing an appropriate system based on our observations of protein behaviour in the different hosts.

          Conclusions/Significance

          Most of the methods presented here can be quite easily implemented in other laboratories. The results highlight certain factors that should be considered when selecting an expression host. The decision aide provided should help both newcomers and old-hands to select the best system for their favourite membrane protein.

          Related collections

          Most cited references126

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels.

          We have investigated the over-production of seven membrane proteins in an Escherichia coli-bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase expression system. In all seven cases, when expression of the target membrane protein was induced, most of the BL21(DE3) host cells died. Similar effects were also observed with expression vectors for ten globular proteins. Therefore, protein over-production in this expression system is either limited or prevented by bacterial cell death. From the few survivors of BL21(DE3) expressing the oxoglutarate-malate carrier protein from mitochondrial membranes, a mutant host C41(DE3) was selected that grew to high saturation cell density, and produced the protein as inclusion bodies at an elevated level without toxic effect. Some proteins that were expressed poorly in BL21(DE3), and others where the toxicity of the expression plasmids prevented transformation into this host, were also over-produced successfully in C41(DE3). The examples include globular proteins as well as membrane proteins, and therefore, strain C41(DE3) is generally superior to BL21(DE3) as a host for protein over-expression. However, the toxicity of over-expression of some of the membrane proteins persisted partially in strain C41(DE3). Therefore, a double mutant host C43(DE3) was selected from C41(DE3) cells containing the expression plasmid for subunit b of bacterial F-ATPase. In strain C43(DE3), both subunits b and c of the F-ATPase, an alanine-H(+) symporter, and the ADP/ATP and the phosphate carriers from mitochondria were all over-produced. The transcription of the gene for the OGCP and subunit b was lower in C41(DE3) and C43(DE3), respectively, than in BL21(DE3). In C43(DE3), the onset of transcription of the gene for subunit b was delayed after induction, and the over-produced protein was incorporated into the membrane. The procedure used for selection of C41(DE3) and C43(DE3) could be employed to tailor expression hosts in order to overcome other toxic effects associated with over-expression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus.

            Transient gene expression is a fast, flexible and reproducible approach to high-level expression of useful proteins. In plants, recombinant strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be used for transient expression of genes that have been inserted into the T-DNA region of the bacterial Ti plasmid. A bacterial culture is vacuum-infiltrated into leaves, and upon T-DNA transfer, there is ectopic expression of the gene of interest in the plant cells. However, the utility of the system is limited because the ectopic protein expression ceases after 2-3 days. Here, we show that post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a major cause for this lack of efficiency. We describe a system based on co-expression of a viral-encoded suppressor of gene silencing, the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV), that prevents the onset of PTGS in the infiltrated tissues and allows high level of transient expression. Expression of a range of proteins was enhanced 50-folds or more in the presence of p19 so that protein purification could be achieved from as little as 100 mg of infiltrated leaf material. The effect of p19 was not saturated in cells that had received up to four individual T-DNAs and persisted until leaf senescence. Because of its simplicity and rapidity, we anticipate that the p19-enhanced expression system will have value in industrial production as well as a research tool for isolation and biochemical characterisation of a broad range of proteins without the need for the time-consuming regeneration of stably transformed plants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination.

              As a result of numerous genome sequencing projects, large numbers of candidate open reading frames are being identified, many of which have no known function. Analysis of these genes typically involves the transfer of DNA segments into a variety of vector backgrounds for protein expression and functional analysis. We describe a method called recombinational cloning that uses in vitro site-specific recombination to accomplish the directional cloning of PCR products and the subsequent automatic subcloning of the DNA segment into new vector backbones at high efficiency. Numerous DNA segments can be transferred in parallel into many different vector backgrounds, providing an approach to high-throughput, in-depth functional analysis of genes and rapid optimization of protein expression. The resulting subclones maintain orientation and reading frame register, allowing amino- and carboxy-terminal translation fusions to be generated. In this paper, we outline the concepts of this approach and provide several examples that highlight some of its potential.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2011
                21 December 2011
                : 6
                : 12
                : e29191
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel, CEA, Grenoble, France
                [2 ]Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel, UMR 5075 CNRS, Grenoble, France
                [3 ]Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel, Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble I, Grenoble, France
                [4 ]Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, CEA, DSV, iRTSV, Grenoble, France
                [5 ]Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, CNRS, UMR 5168, Grenoble, France
                [6 ]Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, INRA, UMR 1200, Grenoble, France
                [7 ]Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble I, Grenoble, France
                [8 ]Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement des Plantes, CEA, DSV, iBEB, SBVME, St Paul les Durance, France
                [9 ]Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement des Plantes, UMR 6191 CNRS, St Paul les Durance, France
                [10 ]Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement des Plantes, Université Aix-Marseille, St Paul les Durance, France
                [11 ]Laboratoire de Bioénergétique Cellulaire, CEA, DSV, iBEB, SBVME, St Paul les Durance, France
                [12 ]Laboratoire de Bioénergétique Cellulaire, UMR 6191 CNRS, St Paul les Durance, France
                [13 ]Laboratoire de Bioénergétique Cellulaire, Université Aix-Marseille, St Paul les Durance, France
                [14 ]Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Cellulaire et Biotechnologie, CEA, DSV, iBEB, SBTN, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
                [15 ]Laboratoire des Echanges Membranaires et Signalisation, CEA, DSV, iBEB, SBVME, St Paul les Durance, France
                [16 ]Laboratoire des Echanges Membranaires et Signalisation, UMR 6191 CNRS, St Paul les Durance, France
                [17 ]Laboratoire des Echanges Membranaires et Signalisation, Université Aix-Marseille, St Paul les Durance, France
                [18 ]Laboratoire des Transporteurs en Imagerie et Radiothérapie en Oncologie, CEA, DSV, iBEB, SBTN, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
                University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JJ DP ED MS TD EPP TV NR. Performed the experiments: FB AFB NP SD PH SB JBR DS DSB. Analyzed the data: FB AFB NP SD PH SB JBR DS DSB PR DP ED MS TD EPP TV NR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DSB PR DP ED MS TD EPP TV NR. Wrote the paper: FB AFB ED MS TD NR.

                [¤a]

                Current address: CEA Saclay, iBiTec-S, Service de Bioénergétique Biologie Structurale et Mécanismes (SB2SM), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France

                [¤b]

                Current address: CNRS-URA 2096, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France

                [¤c]

                Current address: Laboratoire de Bioénergétique et Ingénierie des Protéines, UPR 9036 CNRS, Marseille, France

                [¤d]

                Current address: Deinove, Montpellier, France

                Article
                PONE-D-11-16609
                10.1371/journal.pone.0029191
                3244453
                22216205
                f610eaa0-a1a8-4a62-bfaf-e231a4bc5e66
                Bernaudat et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 25 August 2011
                : 22 November 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biochemistry
                Cytochemistry
                Cell Membrane
                Membrane Proteins
                Proteins
                Recombinant Proteins
                Transmembrane Proteins
                Transmembrane Transport Proteins
                Biotechnology
                Plant Biotechnology
                Genetically Modified Organisms
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Gene Expression
                Plant Science
                Plant Biotechnology
                Transgenic Plants

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article