313
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effect of precordial lead displacement on ECG morphology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inaccurate electrode placement and differences in inter-individual human anatomies can lead to misinterpretation of ECG examination. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of precordial electrodes displacement on morphology of the ECG signal in a group of 60 patients with diagnosed cardiac disease. Shapes of ECG signals recorded from precordial leads were compared with signals interpolated at the points located at a distance up to 5 cm from lead location. Shape differences of the QRS and ST-T-U complexes were quantified using the distribution function method, correlation coefficient, root-mean-square error (RMSE), and normalized RMSE. The relative variability (RV) index was calculated to quantify inter-individual variability. ECG morphology changes were prominent in all shape parameters beyond 2 cm distance to precordial leads. Lead V 2 was the most sensitive to displacement errors, followed by leads V 3, V 1, and V 4, for which the direction of electrodes displacement plays a key role. No visible changes in ECG morphology were observed in leads V 5 and V 6, only scaling effect of signal amplitude. The RV ranged from 0.639 to 0.989. Distortions in ECG tracings increase with the distance from precordial lead, which are specific to chosen electrode, direction of displacement, and for ECG segment selected for calculations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Biharmonic spline interpolation of GEOS-3 and SEASAT altimeter data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society.

            This statement examines the relation of the resting ECG to its technology. Its purpose is to foster understanding of how the modern ECG is derived and displayed and to establish standards that will improve the accuracy and usefulness of the ECG in practice. Derivation of representative waveforms and measurements based on global intervals are described. Special emphasis is placed on digital signal acquisition and computer-based signal processing, which provide automated measurements that lead to computer-generated diagnostic statements. Lead placement, recording methods, and waveform presentation are reviewed. Throughout the statement, recommendations for ECG standards are placed in context of the clinical implications of evolving ECG technology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Accuracy in ECG lead placement among technicians, nurses, general physicians and cardiologists.

              The objective of the study was to determine the reliability of ECG precordial electrode placement by doctors and nurses involved in the emergency care of patients admitted with suspected cardiac diseases. A total of 120 subjects were recruited within 2 days from six hospitals. They comprised physicians, nurses and cardiac technicians involved in the clinical assessment and care of patients with suspected cardiac disease. Subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire and marked on two diagrams of the chest wall the positions they would place precordial electrodes V1-V6. This study showed wide inter-individual and inter-group variations in the placement of electrodes. Notably, V1 and V2 were frequently incorrectly positioned in the second intercostal space, especially by physicians. The correct position of V1 in the fourth right intercostal space was identified by 90% of cardiac technicians, 49% of nurses, 31% of physicians (excluding cardiologists) and--most disappointing of all--only 16% of cardiologists (p<0.001 for inter-group differences). V5 and V6 were also often mispositioned, too high on the lateral chest wall. Nurses and doctors (especially cardiologists) do not know the correct positions for ECG electrodes. Because incorrect positioning of the precordial electrodes changes the ECG significantly, patients are at risk of potentially harmful therapeutic procedures. Equally, doctors who are aware of the possibility of lead misplacement may be inclined to ignore some ECG changes that may be genuine evidence of ischaemia. The only safe solution is proper precordial electrode placement, which requires training and an environment supporting precision.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hzavala@ibib.waw.pl
                Journal
                Med Biol Eng Comput
                Med Biol Eng Comput
                Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0140-0118
                1741-0444
                19 October 2013
                19 October 2013
                2014
                : 52
                : 109-119
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Biophysical Measurements and Imaging, Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland
                [ ]Laboratory of Informatics, Signals and Systems (I3S), National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Sophia Antipolis, France
                [ ]Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Geriatric Center Wienerwald, Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                Article
                1115
                10.1007/s11517-013-1115-9
                3899452
                24142562
                f620c1a2-f7c2-4f5c-a582-dc74d6e4bb34
                © The Author(s) 2013

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 7 May 2013
                : 2 September 2013
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2014

                Biomedical engineering
                cardiac monitoring,electrocardiogram,body surface potential mapping,precordial electrode displacement,shape analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article