0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND).

          Methods:

          We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (Δ G), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above Δ G. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability.

          Results:

          The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of ≥1.5.

          Conclusions:

          This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Dentomaxillofac Radiol
          Dentomaxillofac Radiol
          dmfr
          Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
          The British Institute of Radiology.
          0250-832X
          1476-542X
          March 2017
          27 February 2017
          : 46
          : 3
          : 20160331
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
          [ 2 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
          [ 3 ] Section of Image Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostics and General Care, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan
          [ 4 ] Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Fukuoka Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Fukuoka, Japan
          [ 5 ] Oral Radiology Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Republic University, Montevideo, Uruguay
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Yohei Takeshita. E-mail: takeshita@ 123456rad.dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp
          Article
          PMC5606269 PMC5606269 5606269 D16331
          10.1259/dmfr.20160331
          5606269
          28045343
          f668b91a-8470-4508-8b7f-ac639330400d
          © 2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
          History
          : Received on August 17, 2016
          : Revised on December 19, 2016
          : Accepted on December 23, 2016
          Page count
          Figures: 10, Tables: 1, References: 19, Pages: 8
          Categories
          Research Article

          CBCT,radiography,dental,digital radiography,phantoms,imaging,image analysis,computer-assisted

          Comments

          Comment on this article