12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated.

          Material and methods

          Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies.

          Results

          The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models.

          Conclusions

          The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes - a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria

          Background Two criteria based on a 2 h 75 g OGTT are being used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM), those recommended over the years by the World Health Organization (WHO), and those recently recommended by the International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG), the latter generated in the HAPO study and based on pregnancy outcomes. Our aim is to systematically review the evidence for the associations between GDM (according to these criteria) and adverse outcomes. Methods We searched relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane Library, CINHAL, WHO-Afro library, IMSEAR, EMCAT, IMEMR and WPRIM. We included cohort studies permitting the evaluation of GDM diagnosed by WHO and or IADPSG criteria against adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in untreated women. Only studies with universal application of a 75 g OGTT were included. Relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained for each study. We combined study results using a random-effects model. Inconsistency across studies was defined by an inconsistency index (I2) > 50%. Results Data were extracted from eight studies, totaling 44,829 women. Greater risk of adverse outcomes was observed for both diagnostic criteria. When using the WHO criteria, consistent associations were seen for macrosomia (RR = 1.81; 95%CI 1.47-2.22; p < 0.001); large for gestational age (RR = 1.53; 95%CI 1.39-1.69; p < 0.001); perinatal mortality (RR = 1.55; 95% CI 0.88-2.73; p = 0.13); preeclampsia (RR = 1.69; 95%CI 1.31-2.18; p < 0.001); and cesarean delivery (RR = 1.37;95%CI 1.24-1.51; p < 0.001). Less data were available for the IADPSG criteria, and associations were inconsistent across studies (I2 ≥ 73%). Magnitudes of RRs and their 95%CIs were 1.73 (1.28-2.35; p = 0.001) for large for gestational age; 1.71 (1.38-2.13; p < 0.001) for preeclampsia; and 1.23 (1.01-1.51; p = 0.04) for cesarean delivery. Excluding either the HAPO or the EBDG studies minimally altered these associations, but the RRs seen for the IADPSG criteria were reduced after excluding HAPO. Conclusions The WHO and the IADPSG criteria for GDM identified women at a small increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Associations were of similar magnitude for both criteria. However, high inconsistency was seen for those with the IADPSG criteria. Full evaluation of the latter in settings other than HAPO requires additional studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications: an individual participant data meta‐analysis of European, North American, and Australian cohorts

            To assess the separate and combined associations of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain with the risks of pregnancy complications and their population impact. Individual participant data meta-analysis of 39 cohorts. Europe, North America and Oceania. 265,270 births. Information on maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications was obtained. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were used. Gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, small and large size for gestational age at birth. Higher maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were, across their full ranges, associated with higher risks of gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and large size for gestational age at birth. Preterm birth risk was higher at lower and higher BMI and weight gain. Compared to normal weight mothers with medium gestational weight gain, obese mothers with high gestational weight gain had the highest risk of any pregnancy complication (Odds Ratio 2.51 (95% Confidence Interval 2.31, 2.74)). We estimated that 23.9% of any pregnancy complication was attributable to maternal overweight/obesity and 31.6% of large size for gestational age infants was attributable to excessive gestational weight gain. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain are, across their full ranges, associated with the risks of pregnancy complications. Obese mothers with high gestational weight gain are at the highest risk of pregnancy complications. Promoting a healthy pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain may reduce the burden of pregnancy complications and ultimately the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Promoting a healthy body mass index and gestational weight gain might reduce the population burden of pregnancy complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                linda.meertens@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                Journal
                Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
                Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412
                AOGS
                Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0001-6349
                1600-0412
                14 February 2020
                July 2020
                : 99
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1111/aogs.v99.7 )
                : 891-900
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW) Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA) Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Department for Health Evidence Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands
                [ 6 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sint Jans Gasthuis Weert Weert The Netherlands
                [ 7 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Laurentius Hospital Roermond The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Linda J. E. Meertens, Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

                Email: linda.meertens@ 123456maastrichtuniversity.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4154-7737
                Article
                AOGS13811
                10.1111/aogs.13811
                7317858
                31955406
                f66bb0c9-e8a2-4567-b30d-f2a2d800bbe6
                © 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG)

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 February 2019
                : 14 November 2019
                : 14 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 7541
                Funding
                Funded by: ZonMw , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001826;
                Award ID: 209020007
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Pregnancy
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:26.06.2020

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                decision curve analysis,external validation,gestational diabetes mellitus,prediction,risk assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article