27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma: the 3d English Edition [Secondary Publication]

      review-article
      Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
      Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
      The Japan Society of Coloproctology
      colorectal cancer, appendiceal cancer, anal cancer, Japanese classification, stage grouping

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Preface Based on literature evidence and expert consensus, the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma 1 , 2 ) (JCCRC) has been developed and sustained by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) since 1977. Through defining detailed rules for evaluating and documenting clinical and pathological findings, and handling specimens of colorectal cancer, the JCCRC has contributed to the standardization and improvement of the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in Japan. Furthermore, the JSCCR guidelines for colorectal cancer treatment 3 ), which have been revised several times since the first edition was issued in 2005, describe treatment algorithms conforming to the JCCRC; therefore, its importance is continuing to increase. Under these circumstances, the revisions have to maintain the classification's role to further improve treatment outcomes for colorectal cancer in Japan, which are already among the best in the world. At the same time, there is a focus on harmonizing with the eighth edition of the TNM classification 4 ) and classification of cancers in other organs in Japan. Stage grouping of colorectal cancer was compromised with that of the TNM classification. However, some differences were caused by the classification of lymph node metastasis. Expertise built up over several years emphasizes the importance of the main and lateral lymph nodes (N3) in Japan. Further, the definition of “extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure (EX)” differs from that of “tumor deposits” in the TNM classifications. Meanwhile, because of the low prevalence of appendiceal and anal cancers arising from the anoderm in Japan, the current edition incorporates the TNM classification in these clinical entities. 1 Aims and Subjects 1.1 Aims This classification presents the anatomical extent of colorectal cancer as a means to broadly share clinicopathological information on colorectal cancer and serves as the basis for improving treatment outcomes for colorectal cancer in Japan. 1.2 Subjects This classification applies to primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum and does not apply to recurrence or metastasis. It is recommended that findings for primary colorectal tumors other than carcinomas be recorded according to this classification. The large intestine comprises the colon (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, and sigmoid colon) and rectum (rectosigmoid junction, upper rectum, and lower rectum). The current edition also pertains to the appendix and anal canal; tumors occurring in these regions are tallied separately from those occurring in the colorectum. 2 General Principles of Description Methods Findings are recorded using uppercase letters for the extent of primary tumor (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and distant metastasis (M). The degree of each finding is recorded in Arabic numerals following the designated letter. If the degree of findings needs to be subclassified, then it is recorded using lowercase letters placed after the Arabic numeral (e.g., T4a). “X” denotes the absence or uncertainty of assigning a given category (e.g., NX). Staging is recorded using Roman numerals, and subclassifications are recorded using lowercase letters (e.g., Stage IIIa). Staging for appendiceal and anal cancers originating from the squamous epithelium, anal glands, and anal gland ducts is recorded using Roman numerals and subdivision using uppercase alphabets (e.g., Stage IIIA). 2.1 Clinical, surgical, and pathological findings Categories of findings, i.e., clinical, surgical, and pathological, are identified by placing the lowercase letters “c,” “s,” and “p,” respectively, in front of the designated finding. Clinical findings: physical findings, diagnostic imaging findings, and biopsy/cytology as a preoperative diagnosis. Surgical findings: surgical and diagnostic imaging findings during surgery. Pathological findings: pathological findings of specimens obtained by endoscopic and/or surgical treatments, including intraoperative and rapid intraoperative cytology. 2.2 Findings following preoperative treatment Findings following preoperative treatment are identified by the prefix “y.” Clinical findings following preoperative treatment are identified by “yc,” and pathological findings following preoperative treatment are identified by “yp.” 2.3 Findings of recurrence Findings of recurrence are identified by the prefix “r.” Examples: Clinical findings rT0N0M1a (H); pathological findings rT0N0pM1a (H). 3 Recording of Findings 3.1 Primary tumors 3.1.1 Tumor location The cancer location is recorded in accordance with the anatomical division of the large intestine. For rectal and anal cancers, the circumferential division of the intestinal wall is recorded. 3.1.2 Anatomical divisions of colon and rectum, vermiform appendix, and anal canal (Figure 1) Figure 1. Anatomical divisions of the large intestine. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Colon C: Cecum The pouch-like region extending caudal to the upper lip of the ileocecal valve. The boundary with the ascending colon is at the height of the upper lip of the ileocecal valve. A: Ascending colon The segment that extends from the cecum to the right colic flexure. T: Transverse colon The segment that extends between the left and right colic flexures. D: Descending colon The segment fixed to the retroperitoneum extending from the left colic flexure to the root of the sigmoid colon (approximately at the height of the iliac crest). S: Sigmoid colon The segment extending from the descending colon to the height of the sacral promontory. Rectum RS: Rectosigmoid The segment from the height of the sacral promontory to the inferior border of the second sacral vertebra. Ra: Upper rectum The segment from the height of the inferior border of the second sacral vertebra to the peritoneal reflection. Rb: Lower rectum The segment from the peritoneal reflection to the superior border of the puborectal sling. Note 1: The tubular portion corresponding to the ileocecal valve (transitional portion from the ileum to the cecum) is included in the cecum. Note 2: It is not consistent, worldwide, whether the intestinal tract from the sacral promontory to the inferior border of the second sacral vertebra is included in either the colon or the rectum; however, in this classification, it is called RS and treated as the rectum. Note 3: If more than one division is involved, then each division involved is recorded in the order of degree of involvement, starting with the division in which the bulk of the tumor is located. e.g.: RS-Ra Note 4: For rectal cancer, the distance between the lower edge of the tumor and the anal verge or dentate line is recorded. The anal verge is the connection between the anoderm and hair-bearing skin. V: Vermiform appendix Note: The TNM classification 4 ) is used for the classification of tumors originating in the appendix. P: Anal canal The “anal canal” can be described either as the surgical or anatomical anal canal. The surgical anal canal corresponds to the tubular structure extending from the superior border of the puborectal sling to the anal verge, whereas the anatomical anal canal corresponds to the tubular structure covered by the anoderm from the dentate line to the anal verge. The current JCCRC refers to the surgical anal canal (Figure 2). Figure 2. Anal canal. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Note: The types of cancer that develop in the anal canal include those that originate from the mucosa of the rectal part of the anal canal (rectal type adenocarcinoma) and those that originate from the squamous epithelium of the anal canal, the anal gland, or a duct of it (squamous cell carcinoma, anal gland carcinoma, carcinoma associated with fistula). The former type, anal canal cancer, is described as colorectal cancer, and the TNM classifications 4 ) is used to describe the latter type. [Extra] E: Perianal skin Perianal skin is defined as hair-bearing skin within 5 cm of the anal verge (excluding the external genitalia). 3.1.3 Circumferential divisions of the wall of the rectum and anal canal (Figure 3) Figure 3. Proctorectal wall divisions. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. The circumference of the wall of the rectum and anal canal is anatomically divided into quadrants as anterior wall (Ant), posterior wall (Post), left wall (Lt), and right wall (Rt). Tumors located in the entire circumference are recorded as “Circ.” Note: If the tumor occupies more than one quadrant, then the primary quadrant is recorded first, e.g., Ant-Lt 3.1.4 Number and sizes of lesions and proportion of the tumor in relation to the circumference of the bowel The maximum dimension of the primary tumor, associated maximum perpendicular dimension, and proportion of the tumor in relation to the circumference of the bowel (the percentage of the maximum transverse diameter of the tumor occupying the circumference of the bowel) are recorded. All modalities used for these measurements (such as barium enema, colonoscopy, CT, MRI, ultrasonography, and palpation) are recorded. If the number and size cannot be assessed, then it is recorded as “unknown.” In multiple tumors, the locations, sizes, proportions in relation to the bowel circumference, macroscopic types, and extent of primary tumor are recorded for each tumor. The primary lesion is defined as the lesion with the deepest wall invasion or that with the largest diameter when the depths of wall invasion are the same. 3.1.5 Macroscopic types 3.1.5.1 Main macroscopic types Type 0: Superficial type Type 1: Polypoid type Type 2: Ulcerated type with clear margin Type 3: Ulcerated type with infiltration Type 4: Diffusely infiltrating type Type 5: Unclassified type 3.1.5.2 Subtypes of macroscopic type 0 Type 0-I: Protruded type 0-Ip: Pedunculated type 0-Isp: Subpedunculated type 0-Is: Sessile type Type 0-II: Superficial type 0-IIa: Elevated type 0-IIb: Flat type 0-IIc: Depressed type Note 1: Lesions presumed to be Tis and T1 cancers are classified as superficial (type 0). Note 2: Endoscopic findings are given priority when diagnosing superficial type lesions. The shape of the lesion is perceived as a whole image, irrespective of histogenesis and neoplastic or non-neoplastic difference. Note 3: It is difficult to distinguish between adenomas and cancers based on macroscopic findings; therefore, the subclassification of superficial type is also used for the macroscopic classification of adenomatous lesions. Note 4: If the tumor presents 2 different elements of superficial type, then the type occupying the largest area is recorded first, followed by “+,” e.g., 0-IIc+IIa. Note 5: Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) have grown (laterally) to more than 10 mm in diameter on the surface and are not included in the macroscopic classification. LSTs are divided according to morphology into granular (G) (homogenous and nodular mixed types) and non-granular (NG) types (flat elevated and pseudodepressed types). Note 6: The macroscopic type must remain unchanged according to the histopathological examination results, e.g., superficial lesions remain type 0 even for histologically advanced cancers. Note 7: Among anal tumors, those that originate from the anal glands or ducts of the anal canal wall and predominantly occupy the muscular layer or beyond are defined as “extra-canal type,” whereas those classified as either type 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 are defined as “intra-canal type.” Note 8: In the event of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, macroscopic types before and after treatment are recorded. 3.1.6 Depth of tumor invasion (T) TX: Primary tumor cannot be assessed T0: No evidence of primary tumor Tis: Tumor is confined to the mucosa (M) and does not invade the submucosa (SM) T1: Tumor is confined to the SM and does not invade the muscularis propria (MP) T1a: Tumor is confined to the SM, and invasion is within 1000 μm T1b: Tumor is confined to the SM, and invasion is 1000 μm or more, but it does not extend to the MP T2: Tumor invasion to, but not beyond, the MP T3: Tumor invades beyond the MP. In sites with serosa, the tumor grows into the subserosa (SS). In sites with no serosa, the tumor grows into the adventitia (A) T4: Tumor invades or perforates the serosa (SE) or directly invades other organs or structures (SI/AI) T4a: Tumor invades or perforates the serosa (SE) T4b: Tumor directly invades adjacent organs or structures (SI/AI) Note 1: The extent of invasion of the primary tumor is recorded according to the T classification. Invasion into each layer of the bowel wall and into adjacent organs is denoted using the letters M, SM, MP, SS, A, and SI/AI. SI indicates invasion through the serosa into adjacent organs in sites with the serosa, and AI indicates invasion into adjacent organs in sites with no serosa. Note 2: In the portion without the serosa, the adventitia (A) describes the pericolic/perirectal tissues equivalent to the SS of the portion with the serosa. Note 3: The prefixes “c” (clinical findings) and “p” (pathological findings) are only used for the T classification and not for M-SI/AI (pathologically diagnosed mucosal cancer is recorded as pTis, and not pM). Note 4: Tis conventionally refers to carcinoma in situ without invasion into the lamina propria; however, in colorectal cancer, Tis refers to cancer not extending beyond the lamina propria (i.e., intramucosal carcinoma) regardless of invasion. Note 5: Regardless of the existence of metastasis, Tis and T1 are designated as “early cancers,” and cancers that have grown into the MP or beyond are designated as “advanced cancers.” The globally used terms “early stage colorectal cancer” and “advanced colorectal cancer” refer to stages I-III colorectal cancers and unresectable colorectal cancers, respectively, which define stages differently from T classification. Note 6: For pT4b, the organ invaded is also noted, e.g., pT4b (prostate). Note 7: The extent of histopathological depth is evaluated using the deepest area of cancer invasion. In case the deepest area is vascular/nerve invasion, it should be noted. Example 1: If the cancer invasion is of the proper muscle layer and venous invasion is observed in the SS, then the correct designation is pT3 (V)-MP. Example 2: If the cancer invasion is of the SM, the submucosal invasion distance is 1500 μm, and lymphatic vessel invasion is observed in the SS, then the correct designation is pT3 (Ly)-SM: 1500 μm. Note 8: The definition of the extent of primary tumors has been determined to be consistent with that of other digestive system tumors. Note 9: TNM classifications 4 ) take no account of vascular invasion into T classification; consequently, the extent of primary tumor in the TNM classification and the current JCCRC may not agree in a low number of cases. Note 10: The extent of primary tumor of rectal-type anal adenocarcinomas is defined as follows: TX: Primary tumor cannot be assessed T0: No evidence of primary tumor Tis: Tumor is confined to the mucosa (M) and does not extend to the submucosa (SM) T1: Tumor is confined to the SM and does not extend to the internal sphincter T1a: Tumor is confined to the SM, and the distance of submucosal invasion is less than 1000 μm T1b: Tumor is confined to the SM, and the distance of submucosal invasion is 1000 μm or greater T2: Tumor extends to the internal anal sphincter but not to the conjoined longitudinal muscle T3: Tumor has invaded beyond the conjoined longitudinal muscle T4: Tumor has invaded the levator ani muscles or adjacent organs or structures 3.2 Metastasis 3.2.1 Lymph node metastasis 3.2.1.1 Lymph node groups and station numbers Lymph node groups are classified and numbered according to their anatomical relationship to the superior mesenteric, inferior mesenteric, and iliac arteries as shown on Table 1, and Figure 4. Table 1. Lymph Node Groups and Station Numbers. Reproduced with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Superior mesenteric artery Inferior mesenteric artery Iliac artery Pericolic/perirectal lymph nodes Lymph nodes along the marginal arteries and near the bowel wall• Pericolic lymph nodes (201, 211, 221) Lymph nodes along the marginal arteries, near the bowel wall, and along the terminal sigmoid artery• Pericolic lymph nodes (231, 241: 241-1, 241-2, 241-t)Lymph nodes along the superior rectal artery• Perirectal lymph nodes (251) Lymph nodes medial to the pelvic nerve plexus along the middle rectal artery.• Perirectal lymph nodes (251) Intermediate lymph nodes Lymph nodes along the ileocolic, right colic, and middle colic arteries.• Ileocolic nodes (202)• Right colic nodes (212)• Right middle colic nodes (222-rt)• Left middle colic nodes (222-lt) Lymph nodes along the left colic and sigmoid arteries and the inferior mesenteric artery between the origin of the left colic artery of the terminal sigmoid artery• Left colic nodes (232)• Sigmoid colic nodes (242: 242-1, 242-2)• Inferior mesenteric trunk nodes (252) Main lymph nodes Lymph nodes at the origin of the ileocolic, right colic, and middle colic arteries• Ileocolic root nodes (203)• Right colic root nodes (213)• Middle colic root nodes (223) Lymph nodes along the inferior mesenteric artery from the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery to that of the left colic artery• Inferior mesenteric root nodes (253) Lateral lymph nodes Lymph nodes along the internal iliac arteries and along the obturator vessels and nerves• Proximal internal iliac nodes (263P)• Distal internal iliac nodes (263D)• Obturator nodes (283)Lymph nodes along the common iliac external iliac, and median sacral arteries• Common iliac nodes (273)• External iliac nodes (293)• Lateral sacral nodes (260)• Median sacral nodes (270)• Aortic bifurcation nodes (280) Downward lymph nodes • Inguinal nodes (292) Lymph nodes proximal to the main lymph nodes Lymph nodes at the origin of the superior mesenteric artery and along the aorta• Superior mesenteric arterial root nodes (214)• Para-aortic nodes (216) Lymph nodes along the aorta• Para-aortic nodes (216) Other lymph nodes • Sub-pyloric nodes (206)• Gastroepiploic nodes (204)• Splenic hilar nodes (210) Note 1: The sigmoid artery commonly comprises the first, second, and terminal arteries, with pericolic lymph nodes recorded as 241-1, 242-2, and 241-t, respectively, and intermediate lymph nodes recorded as 242-1 and 242-2. Note 2: Iliac arterial lymph nodes are recorded according to whether they are to the left or right (right = rt and left = lt); e.g., right distal internal iliac lymph nodes are recorded as rt263D. Note 3: In anal cancer, 292 is treated as intermediate lymph nodes. Figure 4. Lymph node groups and station numbers. Red: Pericolic/perirectal lymph nodes Blue: Intermediate lymph nodes Yellow: Main lymph nodes Green: Lateral lymph nodes Gray: Downward lymph nodes White: Lymph nodes proximal to the main lymph nodes Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. 3.2.1.2 Lymph node station number The lymph node station of the large intestine is indicated with 3-digit numbers in the 200's. For lymph nodes of the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries, the first digit represents the group, with pericolic lymph nodes denoted by “1,” intermediate lymph nodes by “2,” and main lymph nodes by “3.” The second digit represents the main artery, with the ileocolic artery denoted by “0,” right colic artery by “1,” middle colic artery by “2,” left colic artery by “3,” sigmoid artery by “4,” and inferior mesenteric artery, along with the superior rectal artery by “5.” Internal iliac lymph nodes are denoted by “P” for central nodes and “D” for peripheral nodes. Internal iliac lymph nodes are identified by “3” for the first digit indicating the group, with “rt” for the right side and “lt” for the left side. As an exception to this convention, lymph nodes in contact with the anterior surface of the sacrum are identified by “0,” and inguinal lymph nodes classified as intermediate lymph nodes in anal cancer are identified by “2.” For consistency with the classification of gastric carcinoma, superior mesenteric, para-aortic, sub-pyloric, omental, and splenic hilar lymph nodes are numbered 214, 216, 206, 204, and 210, respectively. 3.2.1.3 Regional lymph nodes Lymph nodes are divided into regional lymph nodes and others. The presence or absence of regional lymph node metastasis and the degree of metastasis are recorded using the classification N0-N3. Regional lymph nodes are classified into 3 groups as pericolic, intermediate, and main lymph nodes. In addition, lateral lymph nodes are included in the lower rectum (Figure 5). Figure 5. Basic principles of lymph node grouping. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. The specific range of regional lymph nodes is individually defined according to the anatomical relationship between the location of the tumor and its main feeding artery/arteries (Figure 6). Figure 6. Pericolic lymph nodes. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. The main arteries of the colon are the ileocolic, right colic, middle colic (right and left branches), left colic, and sigmoid arteries. The range of pericolic lymph nodes in the colon can be classified into the following 4 types on the basis of the positional relationship with the tumor and feeding artery (Figure 6). a: When the feeding artery is directly below the tumor, the area extends 10 cm in both oral and anal directions from the tumor margin. b: When there is one feeding artery within 10 cm from the tumor margin, the area extends up to 5 cm beyond the arterial inflow site and the opposite side extends up to 10 cm from the tumor margin. c: When there are 2 dominant arteries within 10 cm from the tumor margin, the area extends up to 5 cm beyond the arterial inflow site in both oral and anal sides. d: When there are no feeding arteries within 10 cm from the tumor margin, the area extends up to 5 cm beyond the artery closest to the tumor margin and the opposite side extends up to 10 cm from the tumor margin. In the rectum, the main lymph node is number 253, and the intermediate lymph node is number 252. Pericolic lymph nodes include those between the lowest sigmoid artery inflow point and 3 cm (RS and Ra) or 2 cm (Rb) distal to the tumor margin. However, if the distance from the tumor margin to the lowest sigmoid artery inflow point is less than 10 cm, then pericolic lymph nodes include those in the area up to 10 cm (Figure 7). Figure 7. Perirectal lymph nodes. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. 3.2.1.4 Lymph node metastasis (N) NX: Lymph node metastasis cannot be assessed N0: No evidence of lymph node metastasis N1: Metastasis in 1-3 pericolic/perirectal or intermediate lymph nodes N1a: Metastasis in 1 lymph node N1b: Metastasis in 2-3 lymph nodes N2: Metastasis in 4 or more pericolic/perirectal or intermediate lymph nodes N2a: Metastasis in 4-6 lymph nodes N2b: Metastasis in 7 or more lymph nodes N3: Metastasis in the main lymph node (s). In the lower rectal cancer, metastasis in the main and/or lateral lymph node (s) Note 1: Lymph node metastasis beyond the regional lymph nodes is classified as distant metastasis (M1). Note 2: Of extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure (EX), tumor deposits other than vascular/perineural invasion (tumor nodule: ND) are classified as metastatic lymph nodes. Note 3: The number of dissected and metastatic lymph nodes is described according to the lymph node metastasis ratio (number of metastatic lymph nodes/number of dissected lymph nodes) for each station of the lymph node. The tumor of ND is integrated into that of dissected lymph nodes and the number of ND is described. Example: If in the 251 area, 3 positive lymph nodes, 2 ND, 1 ND(Pn+), and 5 negative lymph nodes are present, then the designation is #251: 6/11 [ND 2, ND(Pn+) 1]. 3.2.2 Distant metastasis (M) M0: No distant metastasis M1: Distant metastasis M1a: Distant metastasis confined to one organ. Peritoneal metastasis not present M1b: Distant metastasis in more than one organ. Peritoneal metastasis not present M1c: Presence of peritoneal metastasis M1c1: Metastasis to the peritoneum only M1c2: Metastasis to the peritoneum with other distant metastasis Note 1: All metastases (lymphogenous, hematogenous, and peritoneal), except for metastasis to the regional lymph nodes, are classified as M1. Note 2: Ovarian metastasis is now classified as distant metastasis (M1). Note 3: In the event of hepatic, pulmonary, and peritoneal metastases, the extent of metastasis noted in 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3 is recorded. Note 4: In the event of distant metastasis (M1), the site of metastasis is recorded in parentheses. When recording the site of metastasis, the following abbreviations can be used: Liver: H, Peritoneum: P, Lung: PUL, Bone: OSS, Brain: BRA, Bone marrow: MAR, Adrenal glands: ADR, Skin: SKI, Pleura: PLE, Extraregional lymph nodes: LYM, Ovaries: OVA, Other: OTH Example: M1a (H1), M1a (ADR), M1b (PUL1, H3). Note 5: With regard to the pathological findings of distant metastasis (pM), “pM0” indicates the absence of distant metastasis confirmed by autopsy, and “pM1” indicates histologically confirmed distant metastasis. Accordingly, the diagnosis of distant metastasis based on clinical findings, intraoperative palpation, and/or image findings without histological confirmation are recorded as “cM0” and “cM1.” When the pathological findings of distant metastasis are unclear, “pMX” is not used. 3.2.2.1 Liver metastasis (H) HX: Liver metastasis cannot be assessed H0: No liver metastasis H1: 1-4 metastatic tumors, all of which are 5 cm or less in maximum diameter H2: Other than H1 or H3 H3: Five or more metastatic tumors, at least one of which is more than 5 cm in maximum diameter The prognostic grouping (Grade classification) of patients with liver metastasis is recorded as follows (Table 2): Table 2. Grade of Patients with Liver Metastases. Reproduced with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Grade A: H1 N0/N1 Grade B: H1 N2 or H2 N0/N1 Grade C: Other than the above 3.2.2.2 Peritoneal metastasis (P) PX: Peritoneal metastasis cannot be assessed P0: No peritoneal metastasis P1: Metastasis localized to adjacent peritoneum P2: Limited metastasis to distant peritoneum P3: Diffuse metastasis to distant peritoneum Note 1: When ascites is present, cytological examination is recommended. Note 2: Negative results of cytological examination are represented as Cy0 and positive results as Cy1. Cytological examination of ascites is I: negative, III: false-positive, and V: positive, with only positive (V) results defined as Cy1. Note 3: The impact on the prognosis of Cy1 is currently unclear; therefore, Cy1 is not included as a factor to determine staging. Note 4: The clinical significance of cytological examination of peritoneal lavage fluid has yet to be determined. If the examination is proved to be positive, then the result is recorded as such, but not as Cy1. 3.2.2.3 Pulmonary metastasis (PUL) PULX: Pulmonary metastasis cannot be assessed PUL0: No pulmonary metastasis PUL1: 1 or 2 pulmonary metastases or 3 metastases or more on one side PUL2: 3 or more pulmonary metastases bilaterally or carcinomatous lymphangitis, carcinomatous pleuritis, and lymph node metastasis in the pulmonary hilum and/or mediastinum Prognostic grouping (Grade classification) of patients with pulmonary metastasis is recorded as follows (Table 3). Table 3. Grade Classification for Patients with Pulmonary Metastases. Reproduced with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. The grade of patients with pulmonary metastasis is determined according to the extent of lymph node metastasis of the primary tumor, distant metastasis, pulmonary metastasis, and disease-free interval (DFI). Grade A: One pulmonary metastasis, DFI≥2 years, and N0/N1; one pulmonary metastasis, DFI<2 years, and N0; 2 pulmonary metastases or 3 or more pulmonary metastases on one side and N0. Grade B: One pulmonary metastasis, DFI≥2 years, and N2/N3 or M1 (H); one pulmonary metastasis and DFI<2 years; 2 pulmonary metastases or 3 or more pulmonary metastases on one side and N1/N2. Grade C: Other than the above DFI is the period from the day of surgery of the primary tumor till the day when pulmonary metastasis is confirmed. For synchronous pulmonary metastasis, DFI is recorded as “0.” 3.3 Stage grouping (Table 4) Table 4. Stage Grouping of Colorectal Cancer. Reproduced with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. 3.3.1 Clinical and pathological classifications for stage grouping Stage is divided into clinical and pathological classifications, which are denoted by the letters “c” and “p” placed before each respective staging (cStage and pStage). cStage is based on pretreatment clinical findings and not on surgical findings. pStage is based on pathological findings. However, clinical and/or surgical findings can be used to determine distant metastasis (M). e.g., Resection of colon cancer without distant metastasis: pT3pN1M0, pStage IIIb Resection of the primary tumor only in rectal cancer with pulmonary metastasis: pT3pN2M1 (PUL2), pStage IV Stage 0 Tis N0 M0 Stage I T1, T2 N0 M0 Stage II T3, T4 N0 M0 Stage IIa T3 N0 M0 Stage IIb T4a N0 M0 Stage IIc T4b N0 M0 Stage III Any T N1, N2, N3 M0 Stage IIIa T1, T2 N1 M0 T1 N2a M0 Stage IIIb T1, T2 N2b, N3 M0 T2, T3 N2a M0 T3, T4a N1 M0 Stage IIIc T3, T4a N2b, N3 M0 T4a N2a M0 T4b N1, N2, N3 M0 Stage IV Any T Any N M1 Stage IVa Any T Any N M1a Stage IVb Any T Any N M1b Stage IVc Any T Any N M1c Stage grouping is possible in the following, even with TX and/or NX. TisNXM0 Stage 0 TXNXM1 Stage IV 3.3.2 Stage grouping following preoperative treatment Staging following preoperative treatment is designated by the prefix “y” placed before the Roman numeral. The clinical classification following preoperative treatment is designated by “yc,” and the pathological classification following preoperative treatment is designated by “yp,” e.g., ypT1N1M0 ypStage IIIa. 3.4 Multiple colorectal cancers, multiple primary cancers In case of multiple colorectal cancers, the number of lesions is recorded. In case of multiple primary cancers, the organs involved are recorded. Note 1: Presence of Tis cancer is specified in multiple colorectal cancer. Note 2: Whether cancers are synchronous or metachronous is recorded. Multiple colorectal cancer is defined as the development of two or more primary tumors in the large intestine. Multiple primary cancer is defined as the development of malignant tumors in different organs. Synchronous and metachronous tumors Tumors diagnosed within 2 months are designated as synchronous. Tumors diagnosed after 2 months or greater are designated as metachronous. In the event of both synchronous and metachronous tumors, it is referred to as synchronous/metachronous tumor. Note: The abovementioned criteria on synchronous and metachronous do not apply to cancer metastasis. Metachronous metastasis is described as metastatic lesions that are newly diagnosed after a series of examinations and/or treatments for the relevant cancer, regardless of the time period between diagnosis and examinations and/or treatments. 3.5 Family history and hereditary diseases For all cancer prevalence in first-degree relatives (parents, children, or siblings) of the patient, the disease name, relationship, sex, and age at diagnosis are recorded. In the event that cancer is found in a first-degree relative of the patient, the disease name, relationship, sex, and age at diagnosis of that individual's first-degree relative are also recorded. Cases of familial adenomatous polyposis or Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) should be noted. 4 Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments 4.1 Endoscopic treatment 4.1.1 Endoscopic treatment method Snare polypectomy Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) Note 1: Any other therapeutic procedure, if performed, is recorded. Note 2: Whether the resection has been performed en bloc or by piecemeal is recorded. Note 3: Resections that do not utilize high-frequency currents include cold forceps polypectomy and cold snare polypectomy. Note 4: In the narrow sense, techniques that accomplish peeling without using a snare are termed as “ESD.” Techniques that implement snaring without any peeling of the submucosa after making an incision around the lesion using either an ESD knife or a snare tip are termed as “precutting EMR,” and techniques that involve peeling of the submucosa after making an incision around the lesion using either an ESD knife or a snare tip with ultimate snaring are termed as “hybrid ESD.” 4.2 Surgical treatment For surgical treatment, the approach, surgical procedure, extent of lymph node dissection, anastomosis method (anastomosis form and procedure), and combined organ resection are recorded. In surgery for rectal cancer, the preservation of autonomic nerves is recorded. 4.2.1 Approach to the lesion Transanal, trans-sphincter, trans-sacral, transabdominal (laparoscopic, open), and others 4.2.2 Surgical procedures Polypectomy Local excision Appendectomy Ileocecal resection Partial colectomy Right hemicolectomy Left hemicolectomy Sigmoidectomy Subtotal colectomy Total colectomy Proctocolectomy High anterior resection Low anterior resection Ultra-low anterior resection Intersphincteric resection Hartmann procedure Abdominoperineal resection Total pelvic exenteration Other types of colectomy Bypass surgery Colostomy, ileostomy Exploratory laparotomy Other palliative procedures Note 1: Surgical polypectomy is a surgical method used to resect polyps at the base. Note 2: Local excision is divided into submucosal and full-thickness resections. Note 3: Colectomy other than ileocecal resection, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, subtotal colectomy, and total colectomy are partial colectomies. Note 4: In partial colectomy, the part of the resected colon is specified in parentheses, e.g., partial colectomy (ascending colon) or partial colectomy (transverse colon). Note 5: High and low anterior resections are classified by the height of the resection line relative to the level of the peritoneal reflection. Note 6: Ultra-low anterior resection is a surgical method performed via a transabdominal approach to remove the rectum en bloc near the attachment point at the puborectal muscle (either proximal or distal side); anastomosis of the proximal side of the intestinal tract and anal canal is performed. Note 7: Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is a surgical method that involves both the transabdominal and anal approaches. It involves surgical dissection between the inner and outer sphincter, resecting the rectum en bloc together with the internal anal sphincter within the anatomical anal duct from directly above the dentate line to the intersphincteric groove, and anastomosing transanally the distal end of the sigmoid colon and the anus. Note 8: Surgical methods for treating familial adenomatous polyposis include total colectomy with ileostomy, total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IACA), total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IAA), and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). 4.2.3 Lymph node dissection 4.2.3.1 Extent of lymph node dissection (D) DX: Extent of lymph node dissection cannot be assessed D0: Incomplete pericolic/perirectal lymph node dissection D1: Complete pericolic/perirectal lymph node dissection D2: Complete pericolic/perirectal and intermediate lymph node dissection D3: Pericolic/perirectal, intermediate, and main lymph nodes are dissected Note 1: For lower rectal cancers or cancers that infiltrate into the lower rectum, the extent of lateral lymph node dissection (LD) should be determined as described below and recorded separately from the extent of dissection of the perirectal intermediate or main lymph nodes along the inferior mesenteric artery (D). Note 2: The inguinal lymph nodes (292) in rectal-type anal canal adenocarcinoma are regarded as “intermediate lymph nodes.” Note 3: The extent of lymph node dissection does not apply to anal squamous cell carcinomas and cancers arising from the anal gland and anal fistula. 4.2.3.2 Extent of lateral lymph node dissection (LD) The extent of LD is classified as follows: LDX: Extent of LD cannot be assessed LD0: LD is not performed LD1: LD does not satisfy LD2 LD2: Dissection of 263D, 263 P, and 283 is performed LD3: Dissection of all lateral lymph nodes is performed Note 1: Lateral lymph nodes are 263D, 263P, 283, 273, 293, 260, 270, and 280. Note 2: If the extent of dissection is different on the left and right sides, then each side should be separately described and annotated using “rt-LD number” for the right and “lt-LD number” for the left. Examples: Right side dissections are 263D, 263P, 283, 273, 293, and 260, and left side dissections are 263D, 263P, and 283, with 270 and 280 also dissected: LD2 (rt-3/lt-2) 263D, 263P, and 283 are dissected on both left and right sides: LD2 263D, 263P, and 283 are dissected on the right side with no dissections on the left side: LD1 (rt-2/lt-0) Note 3: For lower rectal cancers or cancer infiltrates into the lower rectum, the extent of lymph node dissection along the intestine and feeding artery (D) and the extent of LD should also be noted. Example: The extent of lymph node dissection along the intestine and feeding artery is D3, and the extent of LD is LD2: D3LD2. 4.2.4 Anastomosis 4.2.4.1 Types of anastomosis End-to-end anastomosis Side-to-end anastomosis End-to-side anastomosis Side-to-side anastomosis Functional end-to-end anastomosis Note: When an ileal or colonic pouch is constructed, it is recorded. 4.2.4.2 Methods of anastomosis Hand-sewn anastomosis Stapled anastomosis Single stapling anastomosis Double stapling anastomosis Functional end-to-end anastomosis 4.2.5 Combined resection of adjacent organs and structures All organs or structures resected due to cancer invasion/metastasis are recorded. Note: For combined organ resection, whether the organ is completely or partially resected should be recorded. 4.2.6 Preservation of autonomic nerves (AN) (Figure 8) Figure 8. Preservation of autonomic nerves. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. ANX: Preservation of autonomic nerves cannot be assessed AN0: All autonomic nerves are removed AN1: Pelvic plexus on one side is preserved, and pelvic plexus on the other side and superior hypogastric plexus are removed AN2: Pelvic plexuses on both sides are preserved, and superior hypogastric plexus is removed AN3: Pelvic plexus on one side and superior hypogastric plexus are preserved, and pelvic plexus on the other side is removed AN4: All autonomic nerves are preserved Note 1: AN involved in surgery for rectal cancer include the lumbar splanchnic nerve, superior hypogastric plexus, hypogastric nerve (sympathetic nerve), pelvic splanchnic nerve (parasympathetic nerve), pelvic plexus, and visceral branch arising from the pelvic plexus. Note 2: In AN1 and AN3, the side of the autonomic nerves preserved is recorded. e.g., AN3 rt, AN1 lt Note 3: When partial preservation of pelvic plexus is performed, it is recorded. e.g., resection of the 3rd pelvic splanchnic nerve (S3). 5 Assessment of Cancer Involvement at Resected Margin, Residual Tumor, and Curability 5.1 Cancer involvement at resection margins Tumor invasion in the resected margin is confirmed by histological examination. 5.1.1 Specimens obtained by endoscopic resection 5.1.1.1 Horizontal margin (lateral/mucosal margin) (HM) HMX: Tumor involvement of the lateral margin cannot be assessed HM0: No tumor identified at the lateral margin HM1: Tumor identified at the lateral margin Note 1: In HM0, the margin of clearance is measured and recorded. Note 2: When the adenoma gland alone extends to the margin in a lesion that contains both carcinoma and adenoma component, it should be recorded as HM0 (adenoma component positive). Note 3: Specify the margin even when the lesion comprises an adenoma alone. 5.1.1.2 Vertical margin (deep/intramural margin) (VM) VMX: Tumor involvement of the deep margin cannot be assessed VM0: No tumor identified at the deep margin VM1: Tumor identified at the deep margin Note 1: In VM0, the margin of clearance is measured and recorded. Note 2: Occurrences of local recurrence were reported in tumors with the margin clearance < 500 μm. 5.1.2 Specimens obtained by surgical resection 5.1.2.1 Proximal margin (PM) PMX: Tumor involvement of the proximal margin cannot be assessed PM0: No tumor identified at the proximal margin PM1: Tumor identified at the proximal margin 5.1.2.2 Distal margin (DM) DMX: Tumor involvement of the distal margin cannot be assessed DM0: No tumor identified at the distal margin DM1: Tumor identified at the distal margin 5.1.2.3 Radial margin (circumferential resection margin) (RM) RMX: Tumor involvement of the radial margin cannot be assessed RM0: No tumor identified at the radial margin RM1: Tumor identified at the radial margin Note 1: In PM0, DM0 and RM0, the distance of proximal, distal, and radial margins of clearance are measured and recorded. Note 2: The tumor is described as HRM0 when not exposed to the cut surface of the liver and as HRM1 when exposed. 5.2 Residual tumor 5.2.1 Residual tumor following endoscopic treatment (ER) ERX: HMX or VMX ER0: HM0 and VM0 ER1: HM1 and/or HM1 ER1a: HM1, VM0 ER1b: HM0, VM1, or HM1, VM1 ER2: Macroscopic residual tumor Note 1: Residual tumor following endoscopic treatment is histologically classified as ERX-ER1. Note 2: Resection with a macroscopic residual tumor is defined as ER2. 5.2.2 Residual tumor following surgical treatment (R) RX: Presence of residual tumor cannot be assessed R0: No residual tumor R1: Microscopic residual tumor at resection lines or planes R2: Macroscopic residual tumor Note 1: In the event of distant metastasis (hepatic metastasis, pulmonary metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination), the residual tumor is assessed for both primary tumor and distant metastasis lesions, and the greater degree of residual tumor is recorded as the final R; for example, even when the residual tumor after the primary tumor resection is R0, if the residual tumor after metastatic liver tumor resection is R1, then the final R is recorded as R1. Note 2: In the event of the two-stage resection of distant metastasis in a Stage IV tumor, the residual tumor of the primary tumor and distant metastatic tumor in the first and second stages of surgery are comprehensively assessed; for example, with synchronous pulmonary metastasis, when the primary tumor margin in the first stage of surgery is R0 (R2 in assessment of the first stage of surgery) and the margin of the pulmonary metastatic tumor in the second stage of surgery is R1, the final R is recorded as R1. 5.3 Curability Curability with surgical treatment (Cur) Curability X (CurX): Curability cannot be evaluated Curability A (CurA): No distant metastasis (M0), and no residual tumor at both proximal/distal and radial margins (PM0, DM0, and RM0) Curability B (CurB): Not corresponding to Curability A or C Curability C (CurC): Macroscopic residual tumor Note 1: Curability in surgical treatment is comprehensively assessed on the basis of clinical, surgical, and pathological findings. Note 2: Excluding Tis cancers, designate the curability as unclear (CurX) for local resections without lymph node dissection. 6 Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy 6.1 Chemotherapy documentation Name of regimen used Duration (start date and completed date of administration) Reason for discontinuing administration (completion, disease progression, adverse events, refusal, etc.) Time relationship with surgery when used in combination with surgery (prior to surgery in resectable cases, conversion in unresectable cases, and postoperative adjuvant therapy) The indicator of the general condition [performance status (PS)] is sequentially recorded. Response to chemotherapy is evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and adverse events are evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). 6.2 Radiotherapy documentation 6.2.1 Aims of radiotherapy Radical, adjuvant (preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and combination), palliative 6.2.2 Methods of radiotherapy Equipment (source) Radiation quality Energy Radiation technique: fixed radiation, moving beam radiation, etc. Number of beams Treatment position Field size Dose per fraction (Gy) Fractionation: number of fractions per day and per week Treatment period Total dose (Gy) Whether concomitant therapy (chemotherapy, etc.) was performed and the details of it, if any 6.2.3 Radiation field 7 Evaluation of Resected Specimens 7.1 Macroscopic findings 7.1.1 Tumor location 7.1.2 Macroscopic types 7.1.3 Size 7.1.3.1 Tumor size 7.1.3.2 Size of the intramucosal component of the tumor 7.1.3.3 Size of the ulcerated area 7.1.4 Proportion of the tumor in relation to the circumference of the bowel 7.1.5 Distance from the lesion to the resection margin 7.1.6 Extent and properties of invasion and metastasis 7.1.7 Depth of tumor invasion 7.1.8 Lymph node metastasis and location 7.2 Histological findings 7.2.1 Histological types A Colon and rectum 1 Benign epithelial tumors 1.1 Adenoma 1.1.1 Tubular adenoma 1.1.2 Tubulovillous adenoma 1.1.3 Villous adenoma 1.1.4 Traditional serrated adenoma 2 Malignant epithelial tumors 2.1 Adenocarcinoma 2.1.1 Papillary adenocarcinoma (pap) 2.1.2 Tubular adenocarcinoma (tub) 2.1.2.1 Well differentiated type (tub1) 2.1.2.2 Moderately differentiated type (tub2) 2.1.3 Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (por) 2.1.3.1 Solid type (por1) 2.1.3.2 Non-solid type (por2) 2.1.4 Mucinous adenocarcinoma (muc) 2.1.5 Signet-ring cell carcinoma (sig) 2.1.6 Medullary carcinoma (med) 2.2 Adenosquamous carcinoma (asc) 2.3 Squamous cell carcinoma (scc) 2.4 Carcinoid tumor 2.5 Endocrine cell carcinoma 2.6 Miscellaneous histological types of malignant epithelial tumors 3 Non-epithelial tumors 3.1 Myogenic tumor 3.2 Neurogenic tumor 3.3 GIST (Gastrointestinal stromal tumor) 3.4 Lipoma and lipomatosis 3.5 Vascular tumor 3.6 Miscellaneous tumor 4 Lymphoma 4.1 B-cell lymphoma 4.1.1 Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma 4.1.2 Follicular lymphoma 4.1.3 Mantle cell lymphoma 4.1.4 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 4.1.5 Burkitt's lymphoma 4.1.6 Others 4.2 T-cell lymphoma 4.3 Hodgkin's lymphoma 5 Unclassified tumors 6 Metastatic tumors 7 Tumor-like lesions 7.1 Hyperplastic nodule 7.2 Hyperplastic (metaplastic) polyp 7.3 Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) 7.4 Juvenile polyp 7.5 Inflammatory polyp and polyposis 7.6 Inflammatory fibroid polyp 7.7 Inflammatory myoglandular polyp 7.8 Hamartomatous polyp 7.9 Mucosal prolapse syndrome 7.10 Cap polyposis 7.11 Benign lymphoid polyp 7.12 Endometriosis 7.13 Others (Heterotopic gastric mucosa, elastofibromatous polyp, colonic muco-submucosal elongated polyp, etc.) 8 Hereditary tumors and gastrointestinal polyposis 8.1 Familial adenomatous polyposis 8.2 Lynch syndrome 8.3 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome 8.4 Serrated polyposis/hyperplastic polyposis 8.5 Cronkhite-Canada syndrome, Cronkhite-Canada polyp 8.6 Juvenile polyposis 8.7 Cowden syndrome, phosphate and tensin homolog (PTEN) hamartoma tumor syndrome 8.8 Others B Vermiform appendix 1 Benign epithelial neoplasia 2 Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm 3 Malignant epithelial neoplasia 3.1 Adenocarcinoma 3.2 Goblet cell carcinoid 3.3 Carcinoid tumor 4 Mesenchymal tumor 5 Malignant lymphoma 6 Tumor-like lesions 7 Others C Anal canal (including perianal skin) 1 Benign epithelial neoplasia 1.1 Adenoma 1.2 Serrated lesion 1.3 Condyloma acuminatum 1.4 Squamous cell papilloma 1.5 Hidradenoma papilliferum 1.6 Others 2 Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2.1 Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia 2.2 High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia 2.3 Carcinoma in situ 2.4 Bowen's disease 2.5 Others 3 Malignant epithelial tumors 3.1 Adenocarcinoma 3.1.1 Rectal-type adenocarcinoma 3.1.2 Extramucosal (fistula-associated, perianal) adenocarcinoma 3.2 Squamous cell carcinoma 3.3 Adenosquamous carcinoma 3.4 Carcinoid tumor 3.5 Endocrine cell carcinoma 3.6 Others 4 Malignant melanoma 5 Extramammary Paget's disease 6 Mesenchymal neoplasia 7 Malignant lymphoma 8 Tumor-like lesion 9 Others 7.2.2 Infiltration pattern (INF) The most predominant invasion growth types at the leading front of the tumor are classified into the following 3 types: INFa (expansive type): The tumor shows expansive growth, and there is a distinct boundary between the tumor and the surrounding tissue. INFb (intermediate type): Intermediate between INFa and INFc. INFc (infiltrative type): The tumor exhibits infiltrative growth, and the boundary with the surrounding normal tissue is indistinct. Note 1: Cancers that have grown to T1 or further are recorded. Note 2: Judgement is made based on images acquired using either a pathology image of loupe device or low magnification. 7.2.3 Lymphovascular invasion 7.2.3.1 Lymphatic invasion (Ly) Lymphatic invasion is the invasion of tumor cells into the lymphatic vessels. LyX: Lymphatic invasion cannot be assessed Ly0: No lymphatic invasion Ly1: Lymphatic invasion identified Ly1a: Minimal lymphatic invasion Ly1b: Moderate lymphatic invasion Ly1c: Severe lymphatic invasion 7.2.3.2 Venous invasion (V) Venous invasion is the invasion of tumor cells into the blood vessels. VX: Venous invasion cannot be assessed V0: No venous invasion V1: Microscopic venous invasion V1a: Minimal venous invasion V1b: Moderate venous invasion V1c: Severe venous invasion V2: Macroscopic venous invasion Note 1: Invasion of the vascular system is assessed with pathological specimens prepared from the section of tumor at the largest tumor diameter. Note 2: When immunostaining is used to examine for lymphatic invasion, it should be stated. e.g., Ly1a (D2-40) Note 3: When elastic fiber staining is used to examine for venous invasion, it should be stated. e.g., V1a (VB) with Victoria blue staining, V1b (EVG) with Elastica van Gieson staining. Note 4: When vascular invasion is present, but it is difficult to judge whether this is a lymphatic invasion or venous invasion, designate it as Ly/V. Note 5: The level of the deepest vascular invasion should be recorded. e.g., V1a (SS) (EVG) Note 6: When a tumor has an elastic plate confirmed at one-half or more of its circumference, it is considered “V,” and when D2-40-positive endothelial cells are confirmed at one-half or more of its circumference, it is considered “Ly”. Using this method, inconsistencies among individuals judging vascular invasions should be reduced. Note 7: Subtyping of Ly1 and V1 is not needed for endoscopic resection specimens. 7.2.4 Tumor budding (BD) “Tumor budding” is defined as a cancer cell nest consisting of one or fewer than five cells that infiltrate the interstitium at the invasive margin of the cancer. On selecting the region where tumor budding is the greatest, the front of the tumor growth is observed at 200×magnification to count the number of tumor buds. BDX: Budding cannot be assessed BD1: 0-4 buds BD2: 5-9 buds BD3: 10 or more buds Note: BD should be described in case of T1 cancer. In the cancers of T2 or greater, describe if possible. 7.2.5 Extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure (EX) (Figure 9) Figure 9. Extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure (EX) within the regional lymph node area should be recorded. EX includes localized lesions comprising lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion (vascular/perineural invasion lesions), and other lesions (tumor nodule: ND). Note 1: All tumor deposits located in the extramural fatty tissue are regarded as EX in tumors in which continuous spread was confined within the SM or MP. For tumors that directly penetrate the MP, tumor deposits located  ≥5 mm from the leading edge of the primary tumor are designated as EX. Note 2: ND is treated as lymph node metastasis. Note 3: ND involving veins and/or neural fascicles at their growing front should be designated as ND(V+), ND(Pn+), or ND(V&Pn+) because these are associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Note 4: When localized foci of lymphovascular or perineural invasion are identified, the number of foci should be described in parentheses per relevant lymph node station. e.g., if one focus of each lymphatic and venous invasion is identified in station 201, then it would be described as #201: Ly (1), V (1). 7.2.6 Perineural invasion (Pn) PnX: Perineural invasion cannot be assessed Pn0: No perineural invasion Pn1: Presence of perineural invasion Pn1a: Intramural perineural invasion only Pn1b: Extramural perineural invasion Note 1: A distinctive pattern of horizontal spread in a form to replace the myenteric (Auerbach's) plexus can be regarded as intramural perineural invasion, irrespective of the confirmation of perineural invasion. Note 2: Extramural perineural invasion was histological finding of tumor cells invading or spreading along the nerve fascicles external to the MP. Extramural perineural invasion exists as an isolated lesion or within the body of the primary tumor. In diagnosing the latter, emphasis is placed on findings of tumor nests in direct contact with the nerve fascicle without being intervened by connective tissue. 7.3 Histological criteria for the assessment of response to chemotherapy/radiotherapy Grade 0 (No effect): No tumor cell necrosis or degeneration in response to treatment is observed. Grade 1 (Mild effect) (a) Minimal effect: Tumor cell necrosis or degeneration is present in less than one-third of the entire lesion. (b) Mild effect: Tumor cell necrosis, degeneration, and/or lytic change is present in more than one-third but less than two-thirds of the entire lesion. Grade 2 (Moderate effect): Prominent tumor cell necrosis, degeneration, lytic change, and/or disappearance is present in more than two-thirds of the entire lesion, but viable tumor cells remain. Grade 3 (Marked effect): Necrosis and/or lytic change is present throughout the entire lesion and is replaced by fibrosis with or without granulomatous change. No viable tumor cells are observed. Note: Assessment is performed on as many pathological specimens as possible, including those prepared from the section of whole tumor at its largest diameter. 7.4 Histological assessment of biopsy specimens (Group classification) Group X: Inadequate material for histological diagnosis Group 1: Normal tissue or a non-neoplastic lesion Group 2: Lesions in which it is difficult to determine whether the lesion is neoplastic or non-neoplastic Group 3: Benign tumor Group 4: Neoplastic lesion suspected of being carcinoma Group 5: Carcinoma 7.5 Measurement of the depth of invasion 7.5.1 T1 cancer (Figure 10) Figure 10. Measurement of the depth of invasion in T1 cancers. Reprinted with permission from the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma- the 3rd English edition, 2019. Irrespective of the macroscopic type, when it is possible to identify or estimate the location of the muscularis mucosa, the depth of submucosal invasion is measured from the lower border of the muscularis mucosa (Figure 10-1); when this is not possible, the depth of invasion is measured from the surface of the lesion (Figure 10-2). Note 1: In this description, the phrase “possible to identify or estimate the location” indicates that there is no “deformity” caused by submucosal invasion, i.e., muscularis mucosa without disarray, dissection, rupture, or fragmentation. When a deformed muscularis mucosa is used as the baseline of measurement, the depth of submucosal invasion can be underestimated. Although it is not necessarily easy to judge whether there is a “deformity,” if there is a desmoplastic reaction present around the muscularis mucosa, then it is assumed to be “deformed.” Note 2: In pedunculated lesions with a tangled muscularis mucosa, it may not be possible to identify the muscularis mucosa to use as the baseline to measure invasion. In such instances, the depth of submucosal invasion is measured as the distance between the point of the deepest invasion and the reference line, which is defined as the neck (boundary between the tumor head and the stalk). Pedunculated lesions with a tangled muscularis mucosa, in which invasion is limited to within the head, are defined as “head invasion” (Figure 10-3). Note 3: Differentiation is required for the findings of submucosal infiltration of tubular adenoma glands, i.e, pseudocarcinomatous invasion (submucosal misplacement and submucosal pseudoinvasion). 7.5.2 Tumor invading beyond the MP in sites without the serosa The depth of extramural invasion is measured at the deepest part of the tumor. The distance is measured at the site of continuous spread of the tumor. Note 1: Lymphatic/venous/perineural invasion, which is not contiguous from the main lesion, is not included in the measurement site. Note 2: When the MP is preserved, the distance from the lower border of the MP to the deepest part of the extramural invasion is measured. Note 3: When the lower border of the MP is not entirely identifiable, the distance from the uppermost limit of the lower border of the MP to the deepest part of the extramural invasion is measured. When there is a right and left difference at the ruptured edge of the MP, the distance from the lower edge of break point of the MP closest to the tumor surface to the deepest part of the extramural invasion is measured. 8 Treatment Outcome Record Following data are recorded for statistical analysis: 8.1 Number of patients Total number of outpatients with colorectal cancer Total number of inpatients with colorectal cancer 8.2 Multiple colorectal cancers, multiple primary cancers 8.3 Modalities of treatment and adjuvant therapy Endoscopic treatment Surgical treatment Chemotherapy Radiotherapy Other non-operative treatment No treatment Note: Refer to Section 4.2. Surgical treatment when documenting surgical procedures. 8.4 The total number of colorectal cancer cases with treatment, and the number and rate of cases by treatment types The number of cases and the proportion by treatment methods and types are described. 8.4.1 Resection rate Resection rate=number of patients who underwent surgical resection of tumors/total number of surgical patients Number and proportion of patients who underwent surgical resection of tumors with respect to each curability (A, B, and C). Note: The number of resection surgeries includes polypectomy and local excision in addition to intestinal resection. 8.4.2 Endoscopic treatment Patients treated by endoscopic procedure alone are distinguished from those who underwent surgical resection. 8.4.3 Chemotherapy and radiotherapy The number and proportion of patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation therapy are recorded according to the RECIST outcome. 8.5 Number and rate of operative mortality Note 1: Operative mortality is defined as death within 30 days after surgery irrespective of whether the patient was in the hospital or discharged. Note 2: Rate of operative mortality is defined as the ratio of the number of operative deaths to the total number of patients who underwent surgery. 8.6 Number and rate of hospital mortality following surgery Note 1: Hospital mortality is defined as death while in hospital following any surgical treatment. Note 2: The rate of hospital mortality is defined as the ratio of the number of hospital deaths to the total number of patients who underwent surgical treatment. 8.7 Survival analysis The following data are recorded for survival analysis: 8.7.1 Survival Alive: The most recent date of follow-up is recorded. Dead: The date of death is recorded. Unknown (lost to follow-up): The final date of follow-up is recorded. Cause of death Treatment-related death Death due to colorectal cancer Death due to other malignancy: the name of the malignancy is recorded Death due to other diseases: the name of the disease is recorded (not including deaths from other malignant tumors). Death due to accidents, including suicide Death due to unknown cause. 8.7.2 Recurrence/metastasis; site(s) and mode Presence or absence of recurrence Date when recurrence is confirmed Methods for confirming recurrence Site(s) and mode of recurrence Note: Site(s) and mode of each recurrence are recorded in the order in which they were confirmed. Local recurrence Anastomotic recurrence Recurrence in regional lymph nodes Other types of local recurrence Lymph node metastasis (recurrence in non-regional lymph nodes) Liver metastasis Lung metastasis Hematogenous metastasis (other than liver and lung metastases) Peritoneal metastasis Recurrence at unspecified sites Note: Sites of recurrence are recorded using abbreviation demonstrated 3.2.2 Distant metastasis (M). 8.7.3 Survival analysis method The following data are recorded for statistical analysis: Target population (i.e., patients who underwent endoscopic treatment, surgical treatment, etc.) Methods of estimating survival Actuarial survival rate Direct method Cumulative survival rate: Life-table method, Kaplan-Meier method Relative survival rate Event classification All deaths, colorectal tumor deaths (primary tumor death), recurrence, secondary cancer, progression, and treatment discontinuation Test of significance for survival rates Proportion of patients lost in follow-up Footnote This manuscript is reproduced from the first chapter of the third English edition of the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma by permission of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and Kanehara & Co., Ltd. with a few editorial changes. The second chapter and after (i.e., “Assessment of response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” “Explanation of pathological items and supplementary histology atlas,” and others) are omitted from this manuscript. The original version is available from https://www.kanehara-shuppan.co.jp/ Disclaimer Yojiro Hashiguchi, Masaaki Ito, Shinji Tanaka, Hideki Ueno and Takashi Yao are the Associate Editors of Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon and on the journal's Editorial Board. They were not involved in the editorial evaluation or decision to accept this article for publication at all. Conflicts of Interest All committee members involved in producing the JCCRC submitted conflict-of-interest statements based on academic society rules, which are managed by the JSCCR. The JSCCR, the author of this manuscript, declares that there are no conflicts of interest. English edition editors Masafumi Inomata, Kenjiro Kotake, Yoichi Ajioka, Kazushige Kawai, Hideki Ueno, Takanori Goi, Kentaro Nakajima, Tomonori Akagi, Hideaki Yano, Kenichi Sugihara Appendix Members of the JCCRC Committee and the JCCRC Revision Committee. The JCCRC Committee Kenichi Sugihara (Chairman), Yoichi Ajioka, Tsutomu Chiba, Takahiro Fujimori, Hiroharu Isomoto, Shingo Ishiguro, Masaaki Ito, Akinori Iwashita, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Tomoyuki Kato, Tomoe Katsumata, Yusuke Kinugasa, Susumu Kodaira, Fumio Konishi, Kenjiro Kotake, Yasuo Koyama, Shinei Kudo, Ryoji Kushima, Masaki Mori, Takeo Mori, Yoshihiro Moriya, Kei Muro, Tetsuichiro Muto, Atsushi Ochiai, Kiyotaka Okuno, Masatoshi Ohya, Yutaka Saito, Yoshihiro Sakai, Yoshiharu Satake, Yasuhiro Shimada, Kazuo Shirouzu, Tamotsu Sugai, Akinori Takagane, Shinji Tanaka, Kazutaka Yamada, Takashi Yao, Masayuki Yasutomi The JCCRC Revision Committee Kenjiro Kotake (Chairman), Yoichi Ajioka, Hideki Ueno, Masazumi Okajima, Atsushi Ochiai, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Ryoji Kushima, Keiji Koda, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Saito, Yasuhiro Shimada, Shinji Tanaka, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Kazuo Hase, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Kotaro Maeda, Takashi Yao, Kazutaka Yamada, Toshiaki Watanabe, Masahiko Watanabe

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anus Rectum Colon
          J Anus Rectum Colon
          Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
          The Japan Society of Coloproctology
          2432-3853
          2019
          30 October 2019
          : 3
          : 4
          : 175-195
          Author notes

          Corresponding author: Kenjiro Kotake, kkotake018@ 123456gmail.com

          Article
          10.23922/jarc.2019-018
          6845287
          31768468
          f692cb31-fcb8-45e9-ab2a-71ebae1c84bd
          Copyright © 2019 by The Japan Society of Coloproctology

          Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

          History
          : 21 June 2019
          : 8 July 2019
          Categories
          Practice Guidelines

          colorectal cancer,appendiceal cancer,anal cancer,japanese classification,stage grouping

          Comments

          Comment on this article