13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between Pre‐intervention Physical Activity Level and Treatment Response to Exercise Therapy in Persons with Knee Osteoarthritis—An Exploratory Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Examine whether pre‐intervention physical activity ( PA) level is associated with achieving a positive treatment response of pain and/or function improvement after a 12‐week exercise intervention in participants with knee osteoarthritis ( OA).

          Methods

          We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized, single‐blind comparative effectiveness trial showing similar treatment effects between Tai Chi mind‐body exercise and standard physical therapy intervention for knee OA. Baseline PA was assessed by a Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors ( CHAMPS) questionnaire and, in a subsample, by tri‐axial accelerometers. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials–Osteoarthritis Research Society International ( OMERACTOARSI) dichotomous responder criteria was used for clinically meaningful improvement at follow‐up. Associations between baseline self‐reported PA by the CHAMPS questionnaire and outcomes of responders vs. nonresponders (reference group) were assessed using logistic regressions, adjusting for demographic covariates. We compared objectively measured PA by accelerometry between responders vs. nonresponders using Wilcoxon tests.

          Results

          Our sample consisted of 166 participants with knee OA who completed both baseline and 12‐week postintervention evaluations: mean age 60.7 year ( SD 10.5), body mass index 32.4 kg/m 2 (6.9), 119 (72%) women, and 138 (83%) OMERACTOARSI responders. Neither time spent in total PA [odds ratio ( OR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.96, 1.03] nor time in moderate‐to‐vigorous PA ( OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.93, 1.09) at pre‐intervention were associated with being a responder. Similar findings were observed in 42 accelerometry sub‐cohort participants.

          Conclusion

          Pre‐intervention PA levels (subjective report or objective measurement) were not associated with individuals achieving favorable treatment outcomes after a 12‐week exercise intervention, which suggests that regardless of pre‐intervention PA level, individuals will likely benefit from structured exercise interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Vital Signs: Prevalence of Doctor-Diagnosed Arthritis and Arthritis-Attributable Activity Limitation — United States, 2013–2015

          Background In the United States, doctor-diagnosed arthritis is a common and disabling chronic condition. Arthritis can lead to severe joint pain and poor physical function, and it can negatively affect quality of life. Methods CDC analyzed 2013–2015 data from the National Health Interview Survey, an annual, nationally representative, in-person interview survey of the health status and behaviors of the noninstitutionalized civilian U.S. adult population, to update previous prevalence estimates of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations. Results On average, during 2013–2015, 54.4 million (22.7%) adults had doctor-diagnosed arthritis, and 23.7 million (43.5% of those with arthritis) had arthritis-attributable activity limitations (an age-adjusted increase of approximately 20% in the proportion of adults with arthritis reporting activity limitations since 2002 [p-trend <0.001]). Among adults with heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, the prevalences of doctor-diagnosed arthritis were 49.3%, 47.1%, and 30.6%, respectively; the prevalences of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with these conditions and arthritis were 54.5% (heart disease), 54.0% (diabetes), and 49.0% (obesity). Conclusions and Comments The prevalence of arthritis is high, particularly among adults with comorbid conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Furthermore, the prevalence of arthritis-attributable activity limitations is high and increasing over time. Approximately half of adults with arthritis and heart disease, arthritis and diabetes, or arthritis and obesity are limited by their arthritis. Greater use of evidence-based physical activity and self-management education interventions can reduce pain and improve function and quality of life for adults with arthritis and also for adults with other chronic conditions who might be limited by their arthritis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.

            The aims of this study were: to compare energy expenditure (EE) estimated from the existing GT3X accelerometer equations and EE measured with indirect calorimetry; to define new equations for EE estimation with the GT3X in youth, adults and older people; and to define GT3X vector magnitude (VM) cut points allowing to classify PA intensity in the aforementioned age-groups. The study comprised 31 youth, 31 adults and 35 older people. Participants wore the GT3X (setup: 1-s epoch) over their right hip during 6 conditions of 10-min duration each: resting, treadmill walking/running at 3, 5, 7, and 9 km · h⁻¹, and repeated sit-stands (30 times · min⁻¹). The GT3X proved to be a good tool to predict EE in youth and adults (able to discriminate between the aforementioned conditions), but not in the elderly. We defined the following equations: for all age-groups combined, EE (METs)=2.7406+0.00056 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.008542 · age (years)-0.01380 ·  body mass (kg); for youth, METs=1.546618+0.000658 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹); for adults, METs=2.8323+0.00054 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.059123 · body mass (kg)+1.4410 · gender (women=1, men=2); and for the elderly, METs=2.5878+0.00047 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.6453 · gender (women=1, men=2). Activity counts derived from the VM yielded a more accurate EE estimation than those derived from the Y-axis. The GT3X represents a step forward in triaxial technology estimating EE. However, age-specific equations must be used to ensure the correct use of this device. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What proportion of people with hip and knee osteoarthritis meet physical activity guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

              To determine the proportion of people with hip and knee osteoarthritis that meet physical activity guidelines recommended for adults and older adults. Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies measuring physical activity of participants with hip and knee osteoarthritis using an activity monitor. Physical activity levels were calculated using the mean average [95% confidence interval (CI)] weighted according to sample size. Meta-analyses determined the proportion of people meeting physical activity guidelines and recommendations of (1) ≥150 min per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in bouts of ≥10 min; (2) ≥150 min per week of MVPA in absence of bouts; (3) ≥10,000 steps per day and ≥7000 steps per day. The Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence. For knee osteoarthritis, 21 studies involving 3266 participants averaged 50 min per week (95% CI = 46, 55) of MVPA when measured in bouts of ≥10 min, 131 min per week (95% CI = 125, 137) of MVPA, and 7753 daily steps (95% CI = 7582, 7924). Proportion meta-analyses provided high quality evidence that 13% (95% CI = 7, 20) completed ≥150 min per week of MVPA in bouts of ≥10 min, low quality evidence that 41% (95% CI = 23, 61) completed ≥150 min per week of MVPA in absence of bouts, moderate quality evidence that 19% (95% CI = 8, 33) completed ≥10,000 steps per day, and low quality evidence that 48% (95% CI = 31, 65) completed ≥7000 steps per day. For hip osteoarthritis, 11 studies involving 325 participants averaged 160 min per week (95% CI = 114, 216) of MVPA when measured in bouts of ≥10 min, 189 min per week (95% CI = 166, 212) of MVPA, and 8174 daily steps (95% CI = 7670, 8678). Proportion meta-analyses provided low quality evidence that 58% (95% CI = 18, 92) completed ≥150 min per week of MVPA in absence of bouts, low quality evidence that 30% (95% CI = 13, 50) completed ≥10,000 steps per day, and low quality evidence that 60% (95% CI = 47, 73) completed ≥7000 steps per day. A small to moderate proportion of people with knee and hip osteoarthritis met physical activity guidelines and recommended daily steps. Future research should establish the effects of increasing physical activity in this population to meet the current physical activity guidelines. Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACR Open Rheumatol
                ACR Open Rheumatol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2578-5745
                ACR2
                Acr Open Rheumatology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2578-5745
                06 April 2019
                April 2019
                : 1
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/acr2.v1.2 )
                : 104-112
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois
                [ 2 ] Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University Boston Massachusetts
                [ 3 ] Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
                [ 4 ] Tufts University Boston Massachusetts
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7309-9687
                Article
                ACR21013
                10.1002/acr2.1013
                6857980
                31763622
                f6c81c6c-23aa-4076-9b48-756ef414c766
                © 2019 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 9, Words: 6874
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100008460;
                Award ID: K24 AT007323
                Award ID: R01 AT005521
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006108;
                Award ID: UL1TR001064
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.11.2019

                exercise,omeract,osteoarthritis,physical activity
                exercise, omeract, osteoarthritis, physical activity

                Comments

                Comment on this article