25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benefits of simulation training in medical education

      letter
      ,
      Advances in Medical Education and Practice
      Dove Medical Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear editor We read about the satisfaction of simulation experiences of paramedic students1 with great interest. As medical students, with early clinical experience comparative to paramedic training in the UK, we agree that simulation-based learning is well received in health care education. As part of the curriculum at the University of Manchester, we are exposed to a variety of simulation-based environments, ranging from examining simulated patients to practicing resuscitation and emergency care on mannequins. We would like to provide insight into our understanding of where simulation training fits into health care education and highlight a key aspect of its satisfaction that we feel has been overlooked. What differentiates health care education from other courses in higher education is that it provides a vocational qualification, producing professionals who not only have substantial knowledge in their field, but are trained on how to apply this to provide a service. Health care education can be broadly split into two domains –the theory or knowledge, and the ability to apply this in a practical environment to help patients and work as a team. This practical application of knowledge is where simulation-based learning fits into health care education. Williams et al1 demonstrated that the simulation experience was rated as a valuable learning experience (P<0.001) and highlight that this is linked with better academic performance. The study revealed that satisfaction was partly due to the simulation providing a method of consolidating learning and developing clinical reasoning. Our experiences have shown that it also works to deepen understanding by enabling linking of different aspects of the theory. Simulation training provides an opportunity to apply theory and gain experience in skills or procedures that would otherwise be difficult without potentially putting patients at risk, such as managing emergency situations and resuscitation.2 We believe this is the only way to gain such experience which is essential for any health care professional. A key aspect of satisfaction with simulation training that we believe is not highlighted in this study is that it provides students with the confidence to manage similar real-life scenarios. We believe that, in many situations, confidence is directly linked to competence, for example, the robust communication skills needed when interacting with patients requires being able to handle the situation with confidence. The practice provided by simulation training builds up confidence and hence satisfaction, as students would feel more competent to handle real-life situations in the future.3 Many students in this study felt that the simulation training developed their clinical decision-making abilities. We believe one of the reasons for this is that, as students gain confidence, they are more comfortable in making their own decisions and exerting their autonomy. As well as confidence being essential for an individual, demonstrating confidence is important for the patients who have put a lot of trust in health care professionals.4 It is important to recognize that although for the majority of students practice will improve confidence, given the variety of learning styles, simulation training may not boost confidence for all students to the same degree. From a medical student’s outlook, this paper explores a significant matter that we feel reflects our perspective of health care education. Not only is simulation training crucial for the professional half of health care training but, for us, it forms an integral part of our yearly assessments. Williams et al highlight several reasons for student satisfaction with regard to simulation training and we believe confidence to be a key part of this. We feel it would be important to include metrics on confidence when assessing satisfaction in simulation training in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Undergraduate medical education in emergency medical care: A nationwide survey at German medical schools

          Background Since June 2002, revised regulations in Germany have required "Emergency Medical Care" as an interdisciplinary subject, and state that emergency treatment should be of increasing importance within the curriculum. A survey of the current status of undergraduate medical education in emergency medical care establishes the basis for further committee work. Methods Using a standardized questionnaire, all medical faculties in Germany were asked to answer questions concerning the structure of their curriculum, representation of disciplines, instructors' qualifications, teaching and assessment methods, as well as evaluation procedures. Results Data from 35 of the 38 medical schools in Germany were analysed. In 32 of 35 medical faculties, the local Department of Anaesthesiology is responsible for the teaching of emergency medical care; in two faculties, emergency medicine is taught mainly by the Department of Surgery and in another by Internal Medicine. Lectures, seminars and practical training units are scheduled in varying composition at 97% of the locations. Simulation technology is integrated at 60% (n = 21); problem-based learning at 29% (n = 10), e-learning at 3% (n = 1), and internship in ambulance service is mandatory at 11% (n = 4). In terms of assessment methods, multiple-choice exams (15 to 70 questions) are favoured (89%, n = 31), partially supplemented by open questions (31%, n = 11). Some faculties also perform single practical tests (43%, n = 15), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE; 29%, n = 10) or oral examinations (17%, n = 6). Conclusion Emergency Medical Care in undergraduate medical education in Germany has a practical orientation, but is very inconsistently structured. The innovative options of simulation technology or state-of-the-art assessment methods are not consistently utilized. Therefore, an exchange of experiences and concepts between faculties and disciplines should be promoted to guarantee a standard level of education in emergency medical care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Simulation experiences of paramedic students: a cross-cultural examination

            Background Simulation-based education is an important part of paramedic education and training. While accessing clinical placements that are adequate in quality and quantity continues to be challenging, simulation is being recognized by paramedic academics as a potential alternative. Examining students’ satisfaction of simulation, particularly cross-culturally is therefore important in providing feedback to academic teaching staff and the international paramedic community. Objective This study aimed to compare simulation satisfaction among paramedic students from universities in Australia and Jordan. Methods A cross-sectional study using a paper-based English version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale was administered to paramedic students from all year levels. Results A total of 511 students participated in this study; 306 students (60%) from Australia (Monash University) and 205 students (40%) from Jordan (Jordan University of Science and Technology). There were statistically significant differences with large effect size noted in all three original factors between Australian and Jordanian students: debrief and feedback (mean =38.66 vs mean =34.15; P<0.001; d=0.86), clinical reasoning (mean =21.32 vs mean =18.28; P<0.001; d=0.90), and clinical learning (mean =17.59 vs mean =15.47; P<0.001; d=1.12). Conclusion This study has demonstrated that simulation education is generally well received by students in Australia and Jordan although Australian students reported having higher satisfaction levels then their Jordanian counterparts. These results provide important data for paramedic educators involved in simulation-based education and training in Australia and Jordan and pave the way for other cross-cultural examinations to be explored.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Medical simulation-based education improves medicos' clinical skills

              Clinical skill is an essential part of clinical medicine and plays quite an important role in bridging medicos and physicians. Due to the realities in China, traditional medical education is facing many challenges. There are few opportunities for students to practice their clinical skills and their dexterities are generally at a low level. Medical simulation-based education is a new teaching modality and helps to improve medicos' clinical skills to a large degree. Medical simulation-based education has many significant advantages and will be further developed and applied.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Adv Med Educ Pract
                Adv Med Educ Pract
                Advances in Medical Education and Practice
                Advances in Medical Education and Practice
                Dove Medical Press
                1179-7258
                2016
                18 July 2016
                : 7
                : 399-400
                Affiliations
                Manchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Tamkin Abas, 2 Dennis Avenue, Wembley, Middlesex HA9 8AZ, UK, Tel +44 754 284 2451, Email tamkin.abas@ 123456student.manchester.ac.uk
                Article
                amep-7-399
                10.2147/AMEP.S110386
                4957634
                27486352
                f6d7a048-0d9c-4a98-9387-b0b72cfe3acf
                © 2016 Abas and Juma. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Letter

                Comments

                Comment on this article