3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacokinetic study of two different rifabutin doses co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir in African HIV and tuberculosis co-infected adult patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of 150 mg rifabutin (RBT) taken every other day (every 48 h) versus 300 mg RBT taken every other day (E.O.D), both in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) co-infection.

          Methods

          This is a two-arm, open-label, pharmacokinetic, randomised study conducted in Burkina Faso between May 2013 and December 2015. Enrolled patients were randomised to receive either 150 mg RBT EOD (arm A, 9 subjects) or 300 mg RBT EOD (arm B, 7 subjects), both associated with LPV/r taken twice daily. RBT plasma concentrations were evaluated after 2 weeks of combined HIV and TB treatment. Samples were collected just before drug ingestion and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after drug ingestion to measure plasma drug concentration using an HPLC-MS/MS assay.

          Results

          The Cmax and AUC 0–12h medians in arm A (Cmax = 296 ng/mL, IQR: 205–45; AUC 0–12h = 2528 ng.h/mL, IQR: 1684–2735) were lower than those in arm B (Cmax = 600 ng/mL, IQR: 403–717; AUC 0–12h = 4042.5 ng.h/mL, IQR: 3469–5761), with a statistically significant difference in AUC 0–12h ( p = 0.044) but not in Cmax ( p = 0.313). No significant differences were observed in Tmax (3 h versus 4 h). Five patients had a Cmax below the plasma therapeutic limit (< 300 ng/mL) in the 150 mg RBT arm, while the Cmax was above this threshold for all patients in the 300 mg RBT arm. Additionally, at 48 h after drug ingestion, all patients had a mycobacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) above the limit (> 64 ng/mL) in the 300 mg RBT arm, while 4/9 patients had such values in the 150 mg RBT arm.

          Conclusion

          This study confirmed that the 150 mg dose of rifabutin ingested EOD in combination with LPV/r is inadequate and could lead to selection of rifamycin-resistant mycobacteria.

          Trial registration

          PACTR201310000629390, 28th October 2013.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update.

          Tuberculosis (TB) is the world's second leading infectious killer. Cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB) and extremely drug-resistant (XDR-TB) have increased globally. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains a standard clinical technique for using plasma drug concentrations to determine dose. For TB patients, TDM provides objective information for the clinician to make informed dosing decisions. Some patients are slow to respond to treatment, and TDM can shorten the time to response and to treatment completion. Normal plasma concentration ranges for the TB drugs have been defined. For practical reasons, only one or two samples are collected post-dose. A 2-h post-dose sample approximates the peak serum drug concentration (Cmax) for most TB drugs. Adding a 6-h sample allows the clinician to distinguish between delayed absorption and malabsorption. TDM requires that samples are promptly centrifuged, and that the serum is promptly harvested and frozen. Isoniazid and ethionamide, in particular, are not stable in human serum at room temperature. Rifampicin is stable for more than 6 h under these conditions. Since our 2002 review, several papers regarding TB drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and TDM have been published. Thus, we have better information regarding the concentrations required for effective TB therapy. In vitro and animal model data clearly show concentration responses for most TB drugs. Recent studies emphasize the importance of rifamycins and pyrazinamide as sterilizing agents. A strong argument can be made for maximizing patient exposure to these drugs, short of toxicity. Further, the very concept behind 'minimal inhibitory concentration' (MIC) implies that one should achieve concentrations above the minimum in order to maximize response. Some, but not all clinical data are consistent with the utility of this approach. The low ends of the TB drug normal ranges set reasonable 'floors' above which plasma concentrations should be maintained. Patients with diabetes and those infected with HIV have a particular risk for poor drug absorption, and for drug-drug interactions. Published guidelines typically describe interactions between two drugs, whereas the clinical situation often is considerably more complex. Under 'real-life' circumstances, TDM often is the best available tool for sorting out these multi-drug interactions, and for providing the patient safe and adequate doses. Plasma concentrations cannot explain all of the variability in patient responses to TB treatment, and cannot guarantee patient outcomes. However, combined with clinical and bacteriological data, TDM can be a decisive tool, allowing clinicians to successfully treat even the most complicated TB patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

            Optimizing the prescription of antimicrobials is required to improve clinical outcome from infections and to reduce the development of antimicrobial resistance. One such method to improve antimicrobial dosing in individual patients is through application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The aim of this manuscript is to review the place of TDM in the dosing of antimicrobial agents, specifically the importance of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to define the antimicrobial exposures necessary for maximizing killing or inhibition of bacterial growth. In this context, there are robust data for some antimicrobials, including the ratio of a PK parameter (e.g. peak concentration) to the minimal inhibitory concentration of the bacteria associated with maximal antimicrobial effect. Blood sampling of an individual patient can then further define the relevant PK parameter value in that patient and, if necessary, antimicrobial dosing can be adjusted to enable achievement of the target PK/PD ratio. To date, the clinical outcome benefits of a systematic TDM programme for antimicrobials have only been demonstrated for aminoglycosides, although the decreasing susceptibility of bacteria to available antimicrobials and the increasing costs of pharmaceuticals, as well as emerging data on pharmacokinetic variability, suggest that benefits are likely. © 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Challenging a dogma: antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

              The rise in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis makes it increasingly important that antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis produce clinically meaningful and technically reproducible results. Unfortunately, this is not always the case because mycobacteriology specialists have not followed generally accepted modern principles for the establishment of susceptibility breakpoints for bacterial and fungal pathogens. These principles specifically call for a definition of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) applicable to organisms without resistance mechanisms (also known as wild-type MIC distributions), to be used in combination with data on clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In a series of papers the authors have defined tentative wild-type MIC distributions for M. tuberculosis and hope that other researchers will follow their example and provide confirmatory data. They suggest that some breakpoints are in need of revision because they either (i) bisect the wild-type distribution, which leads to poor reproducibility in antimicrobial susceptibility testing, or (ii) are substantially higher than the MICs of wild-type organisms without supporting clinical evidence, which may result in some strains being falsely reported as susceptible. The authors recommend, in short, that susceptibility breakpoints for antituberculosis agents be systematically reviewed and revised, if necessary, using the same modern tools now accepted for all other bacteria and fungi by the scientific community and by the European Medicines Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. For several agents this would greatly improve the accuracy and reproducibility of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                skouanda@irss.bf , skouanda@gmail.com
                gouedraogo@irss.bf , whgautier@yahoo.fr
                cisskad4@gmail.com
                rebecca23fr@yahoo.fr
                giorgia.sulis@mail.mcgill.ca
                diagbouga_serge@hotmail.com
                al.roggi@gmail.com
                gtarnagda@gmail.com
                P.Villani@smatteo.pv.it
                sangarelassana01@gmail.com
                jacques.simpore@labiogene.org
                regazzim@gmail.com
                alberto.matteelli@unibs.it
                Journal
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infect. Dis
                BMC Infectious Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2334
                26 June 2020
                26 June 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 449
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.457337.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0564 0509, Biomedical and Public Health Department, , Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), ; Ouagadougou, 03BP7192 Burkina Faso
                [2 ]GRID grid.14709.3b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, , McGill University, ; Montreal, QC Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.14709.3b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, McGill International TB Centre, , McGill University, ; Montreal, QC Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.412311.4, Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Brescia University Hospital, ; Brescia, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.414603.4, Institute of Pharmacology, IRCCS, San Matteo University Hospital, ; Pavia, Italy
                [6 ]Yalgado Ouedraogo University Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
                [7 ]Centre de Recherche Biomoléculaire Pietro Annigoni (CERBA), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-7669
                Article
                5169
                10.1186/s12879-020-05169-2
                7318514
                32590942
                f6f17cd1-03c7-4f9f-8308-0b6dc6aa9bdc
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 18 June 2019
                : 17 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: EDCTP
                Award ID: TA.2011.40200.026
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001713, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership;
                Award ID: TA.2011.40200.026
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                pharmacokinetic,rifabutin,lopinavir,hiv/tuberculosis co-infection,burkina faso

                Comments

                Comment on this article