21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Bancroftian filariasis: house-to-house variation in the vectors and transmission -- and the relationship to human infection -- in an endemic community of coastal Tanzania.

      Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology
      Adolescent, Animals, Anopheles, Anopheles gambiae, Child, Child, Preschool, Culex, Endemic Diseases, Filariasis, epidemiology, transmission, Humans, Infant, Insect Vectors, Population Surveillance, methods, Rural Health, Tanzania

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The house-to-house variation in Wuchereria bancrofti vector abundance and transmission intensity, and the relationship of these parameters to human infection, were investigated in an endemic community in coastal Tanzania. Vector mosquitoes were collected in light traps set up in 50 randomly selected households once weekly for 1 year. They were identified, dissected and checked for filarial larvae. Vector densities and transmission potentials varied markedly between households, both for all vectors combined and for the individual vector species (Anopheles gambiae s.1., An. funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus), even between households located close to each other. The variation in vector abundance was probably mainly attributable to differences in the distance to breeding sites, to specific household features likely to ease mosquito entry and hiding, and to the number of household inhabitants. Household annual biting rates (ABR) correlated positively with household annual transmission potentials (ATP), indicating that intense vector biting led to a high transmission intensity. Intriguingly, however, the human filarial-infection status (as indicated by microfilaraemia or circulating filarial antigenemia) did not differ significantly between households with relatively high and lower ABR or ATP. Possible reasons for this result include the long time required for W. bancrofti infection to establish in humans, human behaviour affecting exposure, the sharing of mosquito populations between households, and differential susceptibility of humans to infection. The marked heterogeneity in exposure between households, and the lack of immediate relationship between transmission and detectable human infection at household level, should be taken into account when considering the transmission pattern of lymphatic filariasis.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article