68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Interior and surface of monomeric proteins

      , , ,
      Journal of Molecular Biology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The solvent-accessible surface area (As) of 46 monomeric proteins is calculated using atomic co-ordinates from high-resolution and well-refined crystal structures. The As of these proteins can be determined to within 1 to 2% and that of their individual residues to within 10 to 20%. The As values of proteins are correlated with their molecular weight (Mr) in the range 4000 to 35,000: the power law As = 6.3 M0.73 predicts protein As values to within 4% on average. The average water-accessible surface is found to be 57% non-polar, 24% polar and 19% charged, with 5% root-mean-square variations. The molecular surface buried inside the protein is 58% non-polar, 39% polar and 4% charged. The buried surface contains more uncharged polar groups (mostly peptides) than the surface that remains accessible, but many fewer charged groups. On average, 15% of residues in small proteins and 32% in larger ones may be classed as "buried residues", having less than 5% of their surface accessible to the solvent. The accessibilities of most other residues are evenly distributed in the range 5 to 50%. Although the fraction of buried residues increases with molecular weight, the amino acid compositions of the protein interior and surface show no systematic variation with molecular weight, except for small proteins that are often very rich in buried cysteines. From amino acid compositions of protein surfaces and interiors we calculate an effective coefficient of partition for each type of residue, and derive an implied set of transfer free energy values. This is compared with other sets of partition coefficients derived directly from experimental data. The extent to which groups of residues (charged, polar and non-polar) are buried within proteins correlates well with their hydrophobicity derived from amino acid transfer experiments. Within these three groups, the correlation is low.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Protein Data Bank. A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

          The Protein Data Bank is a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. The Bank stores in a uniform format atomic co-ordinates and partial bond connectivities, as derived from crystallographic studies. Text included in each data entry gives pertinent information for the structure at hand (e.g. species from which the molecule has been obtained, resolution of diffraction data, literature citations and specifications of secondary structure). In addition to atomic co-ordinates and connectivities, the Protein Data Bank stores structure factors and phases, although these latter data are not placed in any uniform format. Input of data to the Bank and general maintenance functions are carried out at Brookhaven National Laboratory. All data stored in the Bank are available on magnetic tape for public distribution, from Brookhaven (to laboratories in the Americas), Tokyo (Japan), and Cambridge (Europe and worldwide). A master file is maintained at Brookhaven and duplicate copies are stored in Cambridge and Tokyo. In the future, it is hoped to expand the scope of the Protein Data Bank to make available co-ordinates for standard structural types (e.g. alpha-helix, RNA double-stranded helix) and representative computer programs of utility in the study and interpretation of macromolecular structures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix.

              The spatial distribution of the hydrophobic side chains in globular proteins is of considerable interest. It was recognized previously that most of the alpha-helices of myoglobin and haemoglobin are amphiphilic; that is, one surface of each helix projects mainly hydrophilic side chains, while the opposite surface projects mainly hydrophobic side chains. To quantify the amphiphilicity of a helix, here we define the mean helical hydrophobic moment, (mu H) = [sigma Ni = 1Hi]/N, to be the mean vector sum of the hydrophobicities Hi of the side chains of a helix of N residues. The length of a vector Hi is the signed numerical hydrophobicity associated with the type of side chain, and its direction is determined by the orientation of the side chain about the helix axis. A large value of (mu H) means that the helix is amphiphilic perpendicular to its axis. We have classified alpha-helices by plotting their mean helical moment versus the mean hydrophobicity of their residues, and report that transmembrane helices, helices from globular proteins and helices which are believed to seek surfaces between aqueous and nonpolar phases, cluster in different regions of such a plot. We suggest that this classification may be useful in identifying helical regions of proteins which bind to the surface of biological membranes. The concept of the hydrophobic moment can be generalized also to non-helical protein structures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Molecular Biology
                Journal of Molecular Biology
                Elsevier BV
                00222836
                August 1987
                August 1987
                : 196
                : 3
                : 641-656
                Article
                10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6
                3681970
                f70d3330-a33b-496a-99e9-8ca47ecd03b2
                © 1987

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article