17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Vision, vision-specific functioning and mobility, and their relationship with clinically assessed cognitive impairment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The relationship between self-reported visual disability and cognitive impairment in older individuals is unclear.

          Objective

          To determine the relationship of vision-specific functioning (VSF), vision-specific mobility (VSM) and visual acuity (VA) with clinically assessed cognitive impairment in the Epidemiology of Dementia in Singapore study.

          Design

          Cross-sectional.

          Setting

          Population-based.

          Subjects

          Eight hundred and seventy-four adults aged ≥60 years at higher risk of possible cognitive impairment by the Abbreviated Mental Test and progressive forgetfulness question.

          Methods

          VSF and VSM were measured using Rasch-transformed continuous scores of two Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire domains. Cognitive impairment was objectively determined using detailed neuropsychological testing and defined as no cognitive impairment (NCI), mild cognitive impairment-no dementia (CIND), moderate CIND only and moderate CIND or dementia. Associations were assessed using multinomial logistic regression models.

          Results

          Of the 874 participants (49.0% males, mean age (SD) 65.5 (7.0) years), 277, 281 and 316 had NCI, mild CIND and moderate CIND or dementia, respectively. Compared to NCI, the odds of moderate CIND, and moderate CIND or dementia increased for every SD worsening in VSF (OR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.14–1.82, and OR: 1.52, 95%CI 1.19–1.94, respectively) and VSM (OR: 1.42, 95%CI 1.11–1.81, and OR: 1.50, 95%CI 1.15–1.95). Similarly, the odds of mild CIND (OR: 1.62, 95%CI 1.19–2.22), moderate CIND (OR: 1.93, 95%CI 1.45–2.58), and moderate CIND or dementia (OR: 2.25, 95%CI 1.62–3.11) increased significantly with every SD worsening of VA.

          Conclusions

          Our results emphasise the importance of interventions to prevent vision loss and improve quality of life to reduce likelihood of age-related cognitive decline.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease.

          Our goal was to forecast the global burden of Alzheimer's disease and evaluate the potential impact of interventions that delay disease onset or progression. A stochastic, multistate model was used in conjunction with United Nations worldwide population forecasts and data from epidemiological studies of the risks of Alzheimer's disease. In 2006, the worldwide prevalence of Alzheimer's disease was 26.6 million. By 2050, the prevalence will quadruple, by which time 1 in 85 persons worldwide will be living with the disease. We estimate about 43% of prevalent cases need a high level of care, equivalent to that of a nursing home. If interventions could delay both disease onset and progression by a modest 1 year, there would be nearly 9.2 million fewer cases of the disease in 2050, with nearly the entire decline attributable to decreases in persons needing a high level of care. We face a looming global epidemic of Alzheimer's disease as the world's population ages. Modest advances in therapeutic and preventive strategies that lead to even small delays in the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease can significantly reduce the global burden of this disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050.

            The number of individuals with visual impairment (VI) and blindness is increasing in the United States and around the globe as a result of shifting demographics and aging populations. Tracking the number and characteristics of individuals with VI and blindness is especially important given the negative effect of these conditions on physical and mental health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Age and Ageing
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0002-0729
                1468-2834
                July 2021
                June 28 2021
                January 22 2021
                July 2021
                June 28 2021
                January 22 2021
                : 50
                : 4
                : 1236-1242
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
                [2 ]Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [4 ]Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [5 ]Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
                [6 ]Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
                [7 ]Raffles Neuroscience Centre, Raffles Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
                Article
                10.1093/ageing/afaa276
                f710cab7-1770-42e0-b322-54e9d79ce473
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article