Allergic anaphylaxis due to subcutaneously injected heparin

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Heparins are one of the most used class of anticoagulants in daily clinical practice. Despite their widespread application immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to heparins are rare. Among these, the delayed-type reactions to s.c. injected heparins are well-known usually presenting as circumscribed eczematous plaques at the injection sites. In contrast, potentially life-threatening systemic immediate-type anaphylactic reactions to heparins are extremely rare. Recently, some cases of non-allergic anaphylaxis could be attributed to undesirable heparin contaminants.

A 43-year-old patient developed severe anaphylaxis symptoms within 5–10 minutes after s.c. injection of enoxaparin. Titrated skin prick testing with wheal and flare responses up to an enoxaparin dilution of 1:10.000 indicated a probable allergic mechanism of the enoxaparin-induced anaphylaxis. The basophil activation test as an additional in-vitro test method was negative. Furthermore, skin prick testing showed rather broad cross-reactivity among different heparin preparations tested.

In the presented case, history, symptoms, and results of skin testing strongly suggested an IgE-mediated allergic hypersensitivity against different heparins. Therefore, as safe alternative anticoagulants the patient could receive beneath coumarins the hirudins or direct thrombin inhibitors. Because these compounds have a completely different molecular structure compared with the heparin-polysaccharides.

Related collections

Most cited references 15

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

David A Garcia, Trevor P Baglin, Jeffrey I Weitz … (2012)

This article describes the pharmacology of approved parenteral anticoagulants. These include the indirect anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid, as well as the direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a unique pentasaccharide sequence and catalyze the inactivation of thrombin, factor Xa, and other clotting enzymes. Heparin also binds to cells and plasma proteins other than antithrombin causing unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and triggering nonhemorrhagic side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. LMWHs have greater inhibitory activity against factor Xa than thrombin and exhibit less binding to cells and plasma proteins than heparin. Consequently, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, have a longer half-life than heparin, and are associated with a lower risk of nonhemorrhagic side effects. LMWHs can be administered once daily or bid by subcutaneous injection, without coagulation monitoring. Based on their greater convenience, LMWHs have replaced UFH for many clinical indications. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, catalyzes the inhibition of factor Xa, but not thrombin, in an antithrombin-dependent fashion. Fondaparinux binds only to antithrombin. Therefore, fondaparinux-associated HIT or osteoporosis is unlikely to occur. Fondaparinux exhibits complete bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, has a longer half-life than LMWHs, and is given once daily by subcutaneous injection in fixed doses, without coagulation monitoring. Three additional parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and danaparoid are approved as alternatives to heparin in patients with HIT.

0 comments Cited 244 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Contaminated heparin associated with adverse clinical events and activation of the contact system.

Kevin D Pelzer, Ram Sasisekharan, Mark T. Whary … (2008)

There is an urgent need to determine whether oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS), a compound contaminating heparin supplies worldwide, is the cause of the severe anaphylactoid reactions that have occurred after intravenous heparin administration in the United States and Germany. Heparin procured from the Food and Drug Administration, consisting of suspect lots of heparin associated with the clinical events as well as control lots of heparin, were screened in a blinded fashion both for the presence of OSCS and for any biologic activity that could potentially link the contaminant to the observed clinical adverse events. In vitro assays for the activation of the contact system and the complement cascade were performed. In addition, the ability of OSCS to recapitulate key clinical manifestations in vivo was tested in swine. The OSCS found in contaminated lots of unfractionated heparin, as well as a synthetically generated OSCS reference standard, directly activated the kinin-kallikrein pathway in human plasma, which can lead to the generation of bradykinin, a potent vasoactive mediator. In addition, OSCS induced generation of C3a and C5a, potent anaphylatoxins derived from complement proteins. Activation of these two pathways was unexpectedly linked and dependent on fluid-phase activation of factor XII. Screening of plasma samples from various species indicated that swine and humans are sensitive to the effects of OSCS in a similar manner. OSCS-containing heparin and synthetically derived OSCS induced hypotension associated with kallikrein activation when administered by intravenous infusion in swine. Our results provide a scientific rationale for a potential biologic link between the presence of OSCS in suspect lots of heparin and the observed clinical adverse events. An assay to assess the amidolytic activity of kallikrein can supplement analytic tests to protect the heparin supply chain by screening for OSCS and other highly sulfated polysaccharide contaminants of heparin that can activate the contact system. Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

0 comments Cited 115 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Heparin-induced recurrent anaphylaxis.

Y Haviv, M Shalit, Jana Schwartz … (2004)

Heparin-related immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions like urticaria, angio-oedema or bronchospasm are very rare, and only a few cases of anaphylaxis-like responses because of heparin have been described. However, the mechanisms underlying these reactions and the role of mast cells in their pathogenesis have not been elucidated. We report a patient with end-stage renal disease who presented with recurrent anaphylaxis after receiving heparin during haemodialysis. The underlying aetiology was obscured by the initiation of haemodialysis with its known anaphylactic-like side-effects. The diagnosis of hypersensitivity to heparin was confirmed by the clinical picture, positive skin tests and elevated serum tryptase levels. We performed prick and intradermal skin tests with heparin, enoxaparin and danaparoid heparinoid. Total and mature tryptase levels were measured in serum by ELISAs at 1, 24 and 36 h following the reaction. An elevated mature tryptase level was found at 1 h, which returned to normal levels at 24 and 36 h. A high total tryptase level was detected at 1 h, but remained somewhat elevated at 24 h. Prick tests were negative with the three compounds. Intradermal skin tests with heparin and enoxaparin were both positive, while with danaparoid negative. Following negative skin test results, danaparoid was used as an anticoagulant during dialysis for the next 3 years without any adverse effects. In conclusion, we report the first case of heparin-induced anaphylaxis confirmed by an elevated level of mature tryptase in serum. Following skin tests, the patient was treated with danaparoid during haemodialysis sessions three times a week without any adverse effects. Because of increasing use of heparin in daily medical practice, physicians should be aware of possible immediate hypersensitivity reactions to this medication and know how to diagnose and treat them.

0 comments Cited 11 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol

Title: Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Publisher: BioMed Central

ISSN (Print): 1710-1484

ISSN (Electronic): 1710-1492

Publication date Collection: 2013

Publication date (Electronic): 10 January 2013

Volume: 9

Issue: 1

Page: 1

Affiliations

[1 ]Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, Würzburg, 97080, Germany

Article

Publisher ID: 1710-1492-9-1

DOI: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-1

PMC ID: 3565926

PubMed ID: 23305328

SO-VID: f72f298c-2040-49a9-a6ec-c3c78f43e42d

License:

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Allergic anaphylaxis due to subcutaneously injected heparin

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Gamma Delta T cells

Most cited references 15

Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Contaminated heparin associated with adverse clinical events and activation of the contact system.

Heparin-induced recurrent anaphylaxis.

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Categories

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 154

Cited by 17

Most referenced authors 146