31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      F228. EFFECTIVENESS OF PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE VS OTHER LONG-ACTING INJECTABLE (LAI) ANTIPSYCHOTICS – AN ELECTRONIC CASE REGISTER STUDY

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Paliperidone palmitate is a 2nd generation long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic which is increasingly prescribed for patients with chronic schizophrenia. However, it is more expensive than 1st generation LAI antipsychotics and little is known about its effectiveness in a real world clinical setting. We sought to address this issue by analyzing a large electronic case register of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAI antipsychotics.

          Methods

          Data were obtained from 1,281 patients in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Case Register who were treated with an LAI antipsychotic between 1st April 2011 and 31st January 2015. The number of days spent as a psychiatric inpatient and the number of admissions to a psychiatric hospital were extracted using the Clinical Record Interactive Search tool (CRIS) and analyzed in each of the 3 years before and after LAI prescription using multivariable regression.

          Results

          Patients who received paliperidone palmitate (n=430; 33.6%) spent more time in hospital (β coefficient 12.3 days, 95% CI 2.3 to 19.2, p=0.001) and were admitted to hospital more frequently (IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.61, p<0.001) in the year prior to treatment than those treated with other LAI antipsychotics (n=851, 66.4%). However, there were no significant differences between paliperidone and the other LAI antipsychotics in the 3 years after initiation with respect to the number of days spent in hospital (β coefficient 5.4 days, 95% CI -57.3 to 68.2, p=0.86) or frequency of hospital admissions (Incidence rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.83, p=0.82).

          Discussion

          Paliperidone palmitate was more likely to be prescribed in patients with more severe illness, as indicated by a history of more frequent and lengthy hospital admissions prior to initiation. The absence of differences in outcomes after initiation indicates that the effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate was similar to that of other LAI antipsychotics. However, paliperidone palmitate may be better tolerated than other 1st generation LAI antipsychotics with a lower rate of discontinuation. These findings merit consideration in relation to the high cost of paliperidone palmitate compared to other LAI antipsychotics.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Schizophr Bull
          Schizophr Bull
          schbul
          Schizophrenia Bulletin
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0586-7614
          1745-1701
          April 2018
          01 April 2018
          01 April 2018
          : 44
          : Suppl 1 , Abstracts for the Sixth Biennial SIRS Conference
          : S310-S311
          Affiliations
          [1 ]King’s College London
          [2 ]Maudsley Hospital and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London
          Article
          sby017.759
          10.1093/schbul/sby017.759
          5887356
          f735ec2f-2395-43f1-868c-ee9423460d62
          © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 2
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Session II

          Neurology
          Neurology

          Comments

          Comment on this article