8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication.

          Methods

          Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON ( n = 61,835) and AB ( n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition.

          Results

          Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization.

          Conclusion

          In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

          Cannabis and cannabinoid drugs are widely used to treat disease or alleviate symptoms, but their efficacy for specific indications is not clear.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cannabidiol in Anxiety and Sleep: A Large Case Series

            Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of many cannabinoid compounds found in cannabis. It does not appear to alter consciousness or trigger a "high." A recent surge in scientific publications has found preclinical and clinical evidence documenting value for CBD in some neuropsychiatric disorders, including epilepsy, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Evidence points toward a calming effect for CBD in the central nervous system. Interest in CBD as a treatment of a wide range of disorders has exploded, yet few clinical studies of CBD exist in the psychiatric literature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Effect of cannabis use in people with chronic non-cancer pain prescribed opioids: findings from a 4-year prospective cohort study

              Background: There has been growing interest in the use of cannabis and cannabinoids to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). Cannabis and cannabinoids have attracted attention because of their greater safety compared with opioids, and the possibility that their use can reduce opioid dose requirements via an opioid-sparing effect. Both factors have been proposed to contribute to fewer opioid-related deaths. Methods: We used The Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study, a national cohort of 1,514 people living with CNCP prescribed opioids, to examine relationships between cannabis use, opioid use and pain outcomes over four years. Outcomes: Cannabis use was common, and by four-year follow-up, 24.3% had used cannabis for pain. Interest in using cannabis for pain doubled from 33% (baseline) to 60% (four years). We found that patients who had used cannabis had greater pain severity and interference, lower pain self-efficacy, and greater GAD severity than patients who had not used cannabis. We found no evidence of a temporal relationship between cannabis use and pain severity or pain interference, and no evidence that cannabis use reduced prescribed opioid use or increased rates of opioid discontinuation. Interpretation: Cannabis use was common in people living with CNCP prescribed opioids, but we found no evidence that cannabis use improved patient outcomes. Those who used cannabis had greater pain and lower self-efficacy in managing pain and there was no evidence that cannabis use reduced pain severity or interference or exerted an opioid-sparing effect.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                deurich@ualberta.ca
                Journal
                Harm Reduct J
                Harm Reduct J
                Harm Reduction Journal
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7517
                8 June 2021
                8 June 2021
                2021
                : 18
                : 61
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.17089.37, School of Public Health, , University of Alberta, ; 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, 11203-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1 Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, St. Michael’s Hospital Department of Anesthesia, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-0463
                Article
                509
                10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0
                8186125
                34103058
                f77642f3-628d-4bbc-a1c4-249ff8144c1a
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 12 April 2021
                : 1 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: CIHR PS 159668
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                medical cannabis,epidemiology,cohort study,chronic pain,anxiety,depression,cancer,spasticity,nausea

                Comments

                Comment on this article