A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at detecting peri-implant bone defects.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Clin Oral Implants Res

Title: Clinical oral implants research

Publisher: Wiley

ISSN (Electronic): 1600-0501

ISSN (Print): 0905-7161

Publication date (Electronic): Jun 2013

Volume: 24

Issue: 6

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

Article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02473.x

PubMed ID: 22458628

SO-VID: f7796d8e-30bc-4ce4-8b03-bce0063a5021

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 22

See all cited by

- Version 1