1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heuristics for the sustainable harvest of wildlife in stochastic social-ecological systems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sustainable wildlife harvest is challenging due to the complexity of uncertain social-ecological systems, and diverse stakeholder perspectives of sustainability. In these systems, semi-complex stochastic simulation models can provide heuristics that bridge the gap between highly simplified theoretical models and highly context-specific case-studies. Such heuristics allow for more nuanced recommendations in low-knowledge contexts, and an improved understanding of model sensitivity and transferability to novel contexts. We develop semi-complex Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) models capturing dynamics and variability in ecological processes, monitoring, decision-making, and harvest implementation, under a diverse range of contexts. Results reveal the fundamental challenges of achieving sustainability in wildlife harvest. Environmental contexts were important in determining optimal harvest parameters, but overall, evaluation contexts more strongly influenced perceived outcomes, optimal harvest parameters and optimal harvest strategies. Importantly, simple composite metrics popular in the theoretical literature (e.g. focusing on maximizing yield and population persistence only) often diverged from more holistic composite metrics that include a wider range of population and harvest objectives, and better reflect the trade-offs in real world applied contexts. While adaptive harvest strategies were most frequently preferred, particularly for more complex environmental contexts (e.g. high uncertainty or variability), our simulations map out cases where these heuristics may not hold. Despite not always being the optimal solution, overall adaptive harvest strategies resulted in the least value forgone, and are likely to give the best outcomes under future climatic variability and uncertainty. This demonstrates the potential value of heuristics for guiding applied management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology

            Stochastic resonance is said to be observed when increases in levels of unpredictable fluctuations—e.g., random noise—cause an increase in a metric of the quality of signal transmission or detection performance, rather than a decrease. This counterintuitive effect relies on system nonlinearities and on some parameter ranges being “suboptimal”. Stochastic resonance has been observed, quantified, and described in a plethora of physical and biological systems, including neurons. Being a topic of widespread multidisciplinary interest, the definition of stochastic resonance has evolved significantly over the last decade or so, leading to a number of debates, misunderstandings, and controversies. Perhaps the most important debate is whether the brain has evolved to utilize random noise in vivo, as part of the “neural code”. Surprisingly, this debate has been for the most part ignored by neuroscientists, despite much indirect evidence of a positive role for noise in the brain. We explore some of the reasons for this and argue why it would be more surprising if the brain did not exploit randomness provided by noise—via stochastic resonance or otherwise—than if it did. We also challenge neuroscientists and biologists, both computational and experimental, to embrace a very broad definition of stochastic resonance in terms of signal-processing “noise benefits”, and to devise experiments aimed at verifying that random variability can play a functional role in the brain, nervous system, or other areas of biology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                19 November 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 11
                : e0260159
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Norwegian Institute of Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
                [2 ] Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Evenstad, Norway
                [3 ] Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Steinkjer, Norway
                Fisheries and Oceans Canada, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-1259
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5119-8331
                Article
                PONE-D-21-14753
                10.1371/journal.pone.0260159
                8604319
                34797852
                f789b421-13c0-4764-b3f7-c0f53e670768
                © 2021 Law et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 May 2021
                : 3 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: The Research Council of Norway
                Award ID: 251112
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: The Research Council of Norway
                Award ID: 251112
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: The Research Council of Norway
                Award ID: 251112
                Award Recipient :
                This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway ( https://www.forskningsradet.no/; grant 251112; JL, BM, EN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Methods
                Sustainable Agriculture
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Sustainability Science
                Sustainable Agriculture
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Wildlife
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Wildlife
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Moose
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Moose
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Ruminants
                Deer
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Ruminants
                Deer
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Decision Making
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Sustainability Science
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Carrying Capacity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Carrying Capacity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Metrics
                Carrying Capacity
                Custom metadata
                Input data, simulation code and results are available in OSF repository https://osf.io/u52rp/?view_only=e36abdca3e3c45d8813e6f7b20ce159a Analysis code and results are available in OSF repository https://osf.io/cgwa6/?view_only=973dda4c88ea4a008c3b6e58ff149822.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article