36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Insecure attachment states: their relationship to borderline and narcissistic personality disorders and treatment process in cognitive analytic therapy

      Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Borderline personality organization.

          O Kernberg (1967)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: theory and research.

            Relatively little has been written about one group of infants identified with Ainsworth's "Strange Situation" assessment of infant-parent attachment, those classified insecure/ambivalent. Although virtually all samples contain some insecure/ambivalent infants, these infants are uncommon, comprising 7%-15% of most American samples. Recently developed assessments of attachment in children and adults have identified attachment groups of older individuals thought to parallel the insecure/ambivalent infant group. Empirical work in which insecure/ambivalent individuals are examined as a separate group is reviewed within the context of attachment theory, and a coherent picture emerges of the antecedents (relatively low or inconsistent maternal availability; biological vulnerability) and sequelae (limited exploratory competence) of this group. This picture is used as the basis for additional theoretical proposals, and suggestions for future research are presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger.

              Three studies examined the association between adult attachment and anger. Study 1 examined attachment-style differences in self-reports of anger-proneness, anger expression, anger goals, and responses to anger. Study 2 assessed attachment style, physiological signs of anger, and attribution of hostile intent. Study 3 used a lexical-decision task for studying attachment-style differences in expected anger outcome. Secure persons scored lower in anger-proneness, endorsed more constructive anger goals, reported more adaptive responses and more positive affect in anger episodes, attributed less hostile intent to others, and expected more positive outcomes than insecure persons. For ambivalent persons, the anger experience also included lack of anger control and anger-in. For avoidant persons, it included high hostility, escapist responses, and lack of awareness of physiological signs of anger. The underlying action of working models is emphasized in the discussion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
                Clin. Psychol. Psychother.
                Wiley-Blackwell
                1063-3995
                1099-0879
                May 2000
                May 2000
                : 7
                : 2
                : 138-154
                Article
                10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(200005)7:2<138::AID-CPP231>3.0.CO;2-9
                f78ac402-d641-491d-9304-d881287c2df8
                © 2000

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article