118
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context:

          This study was part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project investigating the impact of quality improvement strategies on hospital care in various countries of the European Union (EU), in relation to specific needs of cross-border patients.

          Aim:

          This paper describes how EU hospitals have applied seven quality improvement strategies previously defined by the MARQuIS study: organisational quality management programmes; systems for obtaining patients’ views; patient safety systems; audit and internal assessment of clinical standards; clinical and practice guidelines; performance indicators; and external assessment.

          Methods:

          A web-based questionnaire was used to survey acute care hospitals in eight EU countries. The reported findings were later validated via on-site survey and site visits in a sample of the participating hospitals. Data collection took place from April to August 2006.

          Results:

          389 hospitals participated in the survey; response rates varied per country. All seven quality improvement strategies were widely used in European countries. Activities related to external assessment were the most broadly applied across Europe, and activities related to patient involvement were the least widely implemented. No one country implemented all quality strategies at all hospitals. There were no differences between participating hospitals in western and eastern European countries regarding the application of quality improvement strategies.

          Conclusions:

          Implementation varied per country and per quality improvement strategy, leaving considerable scope for progress in quality improvements. The results may contribute to benchmarking activities in European countries, and point to further areas of research to explore the relationship between the application of quality improvement strategies and actual hospital performance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

          To compare length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and rate of routine discharge between laparoscopic and open appendectomy based on a representative, nationwide database. Numerous single-institutional randomized clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. The results, however, are conflicting, and a consensus concerning the relative advantages of each procedure has not yet been reached. Patients with primary ICD-9 procedure codes for laparoscopic and open appendectomy were selected from the 1997 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a database that approximates 20% of all US community hospital discharges. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the risk-adjusted endpoints. Discharge abstracts of 43757 patients were used for our analyses. 7618 patients (17.4%) underwent laparoscopic and 36139 patients (82.6%) open appendectomy. Patients had an average age of 30.7 years and were predominantly white (58.1%) and male (58.6%). After adjusting for other covariates, laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with shorter median hospital stay (laparoscopic appendectomy: 2.06 days, open appendectomy: 2.88 days, P < 0.0001), lower rate of infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.5 [0.38, 0.66], P < 0.0001), decreased gastrointestinal complications (OR = 0.8 [0.68, 0.96], P = 0.02), lower overall complications (OR = 0.84 [0.75, 0.94], P = 0.002), and higher rate of routine discharge (OR = 3.22 [2.47, 4.46], P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic appendectomy has significant advantages over open appendectomy with respect to length of hospital stay, rate of routine discharge, and postoperative in-hospital morbidity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents.

            Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non-English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. One assessor (for non-English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996.

              To study mortality after appendectomy. The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains controversial, with advocates of early surgery as well as of expectant management. Mortality is not known. The authors conducted a complete follow-up of deaths within 30 days after all appendectomies in Sweden (population 8.9 million) during the years 1987 to 1996 (n = 117,424) by register linkage. The case fatality rate (CFR) and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were analyzed by discharge diagnosis. The CFR was 2.44 per 1,000 appendectomies. It was strongly related to age (0.31 per 1,000 appendectomies at 0-9 years of age, decreasing to 0.07 at 20-29 years, and reaching 164 among nonagenarians) and diagnosis at surgery (0.8 per 1,000 appendectomies after nonperforated appendicitis, 5.1 after perforated appendicitis, 1.9 after appendectomies for nonsurgical abdominal pain, and 10.0 for those with other diagnoses). The SMR showed a sevenfold excess rate of deaths after appendectomy compared with the general population. The relation to age was less marked (SMR of 44.4 at 0-9 years, decreasing to 2.4 in patients aged 20-29 years. and reaching 8.1 in nonagenarians). The SMR was doubled after perforation compared with nonperforated appendicitis (6.5 and 3.5, respectively). Nonsurgical abdominal pain and other diagnoses were associated with a high excess rate of deaths (9.1 and 14.9, respectively). The most common causes of deaths were appendicitis, ischemic heart diseases and tumors, followed by gastrointestinal diseases. The CFR after appendectomy is high in elderly patients. The excess rate of death for patients with nonperforated appendicitis and nonsurgical abdominal pain suggests that the deaths may partly be caused by the surgical trauma. Increased diagnostic efforts rather than urgent appendectomy are therefore warranted among frail patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Qual Saf Health Care
                qshc
                Quality & Safety in Health Care
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1475-3898
                1475-3901
                2009
                February 2009
                26 January 2009
                1 February 2009
                : 18
                : Suppl_1 , Assessing the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies in Europe: the MARQuIS project
                : i28-i37
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [2 ]Avedis Donabedian Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr M J M H (Kiki) Lombarts, Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands; m.j.lombarts@ 123456amc.uva.nl
                Article
                qc29363
                10.1136/qshc.2008.029363
                3269892
                19188458
                f79817df-b3ed-4bdc-b965-d470f377a012
                © Lombarts et al 2009

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 November 2008
                Categories
                Supplement

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article