100
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent health problem in Switzerland and a leading cause of reduced work performance and disability. This study estimated the total cost of LBP in Switzerland in 2005 from a societal perspective using a bottom-up prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach. The study considers more cost categories than are typically investigated and includes the costs associated with a multitude of LBP sufferers who are not under medical care. The findings are based on a questionnaire completed by a sample of 2,507 German-speaking respondents, of whom 1,253 suffered from LBP in the last 4 weeks; 346 of them were receiving medical treatment for their LBP. Direct costs of LBP were estimated at €2.6 billion and direct medical costs at 6.1% of the total healthcare expenditure in Switzerland. Productivity losses were estimated at €4.1 billion with the human capital approach and €2.2 billion with the friction cost approach. Presenteeism was the single most prominent cost category. The total economic burden of LBP to Swiss society was between 1.6 and 2.3% of GDP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease.

          A new approach for estimating the indirect costs of disease, which explicitly considers economic circumstances that limit production losses due to disease, is presented (the friction cost method). For the Netherlands the short-term friction costs in 1990 amount to 1.5-2.5% of net national income (NNI), depending on the extent to which short-term absence from work induces production loss and costs. The medium-term macro-economic consequences of absence from work and disability reduce NNI by an additional 0.8%. These estimates are considerably lower than estimates based on the traditional human capital approach, but they better reflect the economic impact of illness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

            In this study we estimated the costs of back pain to society in The Netherlands in 1991 to be 1.7% of the GNP. The results also show that musculoskeletal diseases are the fifth most expensive disease category regarding hospital care, and the most expensive regarding work absenteeism and disablement. One-third of the hospital care costs and one-half of the costs of absenteeism and disablement due to musculoskeletal disease were due to back pain. The total direct medical costs of back pain were estimated at US$367.6 million. The total costs of hospital care due to back pain constituted the largest part of the direct medical costs and were estimated at US$200 million. The mean costs of hospital care for back pain per case were US$3856 for an inpatient and US$199 for an outpatient. The total indirect costs of back pain for the entire labour force in The Netherlands in 1991 were estimated at US$4.6 billion; US$3.1 billion was due to absenteeism and US$1.5 billion to disablement. The mean costs per case of absenteeism and disablement due to back pain were US$4622 and US$9493, respectively. The indirect costs constituted 93% of the total costs of back pain, the direct medical costs contributed only 7%. It is therefore concluded that back pain is not only a major medical problem but also a major economical problem.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Low back pain

              Low back pain is a leading cause of disability. It occurs in similar proportions in all cultures, interferes with quality of life and work performance, and is the most common reason for medical consultations. Few cases of back pain are due to specific causes; most cases are non-specific. Acute back pain is the most common presentation and is usually self-limiting, lasting less than three months regardless of treatment. Chronic back pain is a more difficult problem, which often has strong psychological overlay: work dissatisfaction, boredom, and a generous compensation system contribute to it. Among the diagnoses offered for chronic pain is fibromyalgia, an urban condition (the diagnosis is not made in rural settings) that does not differ materially from other instances of widespread chronic pain. Although disc protrusions detected on X-ray are often blamed, they rarely are responsible for the pain, and surgery is seldom successful at alleviating it. No single treatment is superior to others; patients prefer manipulative therapy, but studies have not demonstrated that it has any superiority over others. A WHO Advisory Panel has defined common outcome measures to be used to judge the efficacy of treatments for studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wiso@zhaw.ch
                Journal
                Eur J Health Econ
                The European Journal of Health Economics
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1618-7598
                1618-7601
                5 June 2010
                5 June 2010
                October 2011
                : 12
                : 5
                : 455-467
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Winterthur Institute of Health Economics WIG, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 958, St. Georgenstrasse 70, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
                [2 ]Institute of Data Analysis and Process Design IDP, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
                [3 ]Spine Center Division, Department of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
                [4 ]Department for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
                [5 ]Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
                Article
                258
                10.1007/s10198-010-0258-y
                3160551
                20526649
                © The Author(s) 2010
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2011

                Comments

                Comment on this article