21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Originally designed for prosthetic control, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) prevent neuroma formation by providing free muscle grafts as physiological targets for peripheral nerve ingrowth. We report the first series of patients undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic postamputation neuromas.

          Methods:

          A retrospective case series of all amputees undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic neuromas between November 2013 and June 2015 is presented. Data were obtained via chart review and phone interviews using questions derived from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments. Statistical analyses were performed using dependent sample t tests with a significance threshold of P < 0.01.

          Results:

          Forty-six RPNIs were implanted into 16 amputees for neuroma relief (3 upper extremities and 14 lower extremities). Mean age was 53.5 years (6 females and 10 males). All patients participated in postoperative phone interviews at 7.5 ± 3.4 (range: 3–15) months. Patients reported a 71% reduction in neuroma pain and a 53% reduction in phantom pain. Most patients felt satisfied or highly satisfied with RPNI surgery (75%), reporting decreased (56%) or stable (44%) levels of analgesic use. Most patients would strongly recommend RPNI surgery to a friend (88%) and would do it again if given the option (94%). Complications included delayed wound healing ( n = 4) and neuroma pain at a different site ( n = 2).

          Conclusions:

          RPNI implantation carries a reasonable complication profile while offering a simple, effective treatment for symptomatic neuromas. Most patients report a significant reduction in neuroma and phantom pain with a high level of satisfaction. The physiological basis for preventing neuroma recurrence is an intriguing benefit to this approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain.

          Postamputation neuroma pain can prevent comfortable prosthesis wear in patients with limb amputations, and currently available treatments are not consistently effective. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a decade-old technique that employs a series of novel nerve transfers to permit intuitive control of upper-limb prostheses. Clinical experience suggests that it may also serve as an effective therapy for postamputation neuroma pain; however, this has not been explicitly studied.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode.

            The regenerative peripheral nerve interface is an internal interface for signal transduction with external electronics of prosthetic limbs; it consists of an electrode and a unit of free muscle that is neurotized by a transected residual peripheral nerve. Adding a conductive polymer coating on electrodes improves electrode conductivity. This study examines regenerative peripheral nerve interface tissue viability and signal fidelity in the presence of an implanted electrode coated or uncoated with a conductive polymer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of the painful neuroma by neuroma resection and muscle implantation.

              The successful treatment of the painful neuroma remains an elusive surgical goal. This report evaluates one approach to the management of this problem which entails neuroma excision and placement of the proximal end of the nerve away from denervated skin, away from tension, and into a well-vascularized environment: muscle. Seventy-eight neuromas in 60 patients with a mean follow-up of 31 months (range 18 to 43 months) were evaluated. Sixty-seven percent of these patients involved Workmen's Compensation and 57 percent had had at least one previous operation to treat their pain. The results demonstrated good to excellent results in 82 percent of the treated nerves in the entire group. Factors that were predictive of a poorer outcome were (1) digital neuroma (p less than 0.0005), (2) Workmen's Compensation (p less than 0.01), and (3) three or more previous operations for pain (p less than 0.01). Transposition of nerves into small superficial muscles or muscles with significant excursion resulted in treatment failures. The etiology and histopathology of treatment failures are reviewed. Treatment of radial sensory neuromas by transposition of the radial sensory nerve into the brachioradialis muscle when any associated injury to the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve was also treated, gave good to excellent relief of pain, and improved hand function in 88 percent of the patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                December 2016
                27 December 2016
                : 4
                : 12
                : e1038
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and []Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.
                Author notes
                Paul S. Cederna, MD, University of Michigan Health System, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, 2130 Taubman Health Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, E-mail: cederna@ 123456med.umich.edu
                Article
                00006
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038
                5222635
                28293490
                f7de600c-c7c8-48ec-bc68-44f57407f231
                Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 14 May 2016
                : 02 August 2016
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article