41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neuroethology of reward and decision making

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ethology, the evolutionary science of behaviour, assumes that natural selection shapes behaviour and its neural substrates in humans and other animals. In this view, the nervous system of any animal comprises a suite of morphological and behavioural adaptations for solving specific information processing problems posed by the physical or social environment. Since the allocation of behaviour often reflects economic optimization of evolutionary fitness subject to physical and cognitive constraints, neurobiological studies of reward, punishment, motivation and decision making will profit from an appreciation of the information processing problems confronted by animals in their natural physical and social environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

            The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in emotion and emotion-related learning. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we measured brain activation in human subjects doing an emotion-related visual reversal-learning task in which choice of the correct stimulus led to a probabilistically determined 'monetary' reward and choice of the incorrect stimulus led to a monetary loss. Distinct areas of the OFC were activated by monetary rewards and punishments. Moreover, in these areas, we found a correlation between the magnitude of the brain activation and the magnitude of the rewards and punishments received. These findings indicate that one emotional involvement of the human orbitofrontal cortex is its representation of the magnitudes of abstract rewards and punishments, such as receiving or losing money.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of altruistic punishment.

              Many people voluntarily incur costs to punish violations of social norms. Evolutionary models and empirical evidence indicate that such altruistic punishment has been a decisive force in the evolution of human cooperation. We used H2 15O positron emission tomography to examine the neural basis for altruistic punishment of defectors in an economic exchange. Subjects could punish defection either symbolically or effectively. Symbolic punishment did not reduce the defector's economic payoff, whereas effective punishment did reduce the payoff. We scanned the subjects' brains while they learned about the defector's abuse of trust and determined the punishment. Effective punishment, as compared with symbolic punishment, activated the dorsal striatum, which has been implicated in the processing of rewards that accrue as a result of goal-directed actions. Moreover, subjects with stronger activations in the dorsal striatum were willing to incur greater costs in order to punish. Our findings support the hypothesis that people derive satisfaction from punishing norm violations and that the activation in the dorsal striatum reflects the anticipated satisfaction from punishing defectors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                RSTB
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society (London )
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                1 October 2008
                12 December 2008
                : 363
                : 1511 , Theme Issue ‘Neuroeconomics’ compiled by Wolfram Schultz
                : 3825-3835
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Durham, NC 27708, USA
                [2 ]Center for Neuroeconomic Studies Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
                [3 ]Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University Durham, NC 27708, USA
                [4 ]Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University Durham, NC 27708, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Author and address for correspondence: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC27708, USA ( karlikiiko@ 123456gmail.com )
                Article
                rstb20080159
                10.1098/rstb.2008.0159
                2581784
                18829427
                f7e620cd-086b-41ce-8eb9-d7d9fe0eb14f
                Copyright © 2008 The Royal Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Philosophy of science
                foraging,neuroethology,social reward,risk,game theory,neuroeconomics
                Philosophy of science
                foraging, neuroethology, social reward, risk, game theory, neuroeconomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article