17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Novel truncation mutations in MYRF cause autosomal dominant high hyperopia mapped to 11p12–q13.3

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          High hyperopia is a common and severe form of refractive error. Genetic factors play important roles in the development of high hyperopia but the exact gene responsible for this condition is mostly unknown. We identified a large Chinese family with autosomal dominant high hyperopia. A genome-wide linkage scan mapped the high hyperopia to chromosome 11p12–q13.3, with maximum log of the odds scores of 4.68 at theta = 0 for D11S987. Parallel whole-exome sequencing detected a novel c.3377delG (p.Gly1126Valfs*31) heterozygous mutation in the MYRF gene within the linkage interval. Whole-exome sequencing in other 121 probands with high hyperopia identified additional novel mutations in MYRF within two other families: a de novo c.3274_3275delAG (p.Leu1093Profs*22) heterozygous mutation and a c.3194+2T>C heterozygous mutation. All three mutations are located in the C-terminal region of MYRF and are predicted to result in truncation of that portion. Two patients from two of the three families developed angle-closure glaucoma. These three mutations were present in neither the ExAC database nor our in-house whole-exome sequencing data from 3280 individuals. No other truncation mutations in MYRF were detected in the 3280 individuals. Knockdown of myrf resulted in small eye size in zebrafish. These evidence all support that truncation mutations in the C-terminal region of MYRF are responsible for autosomal dominant high hyperopia in these families. Our results may provide useful clues for further understanding the functional role of the C-terminal region of this critical myelin regulatory factor, as well as the molecular pathogenesis of high hyperopia and its associated angle-closure glaucoma.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00439-019-02039-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't know.

          Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is a common cause of blindness. Angle closure is a fundamental pathologic process in PAGC. With the development of imaging devices for the anterior segment of the eye, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of angle closure has been reached. Aside from pupillary block and plateau iris, multiple-mechanisms are more common contributors for closure of the angle such as choroidal thickness and uveal expansion, which may be responsible for the presenting features of PACG. Recent Genome Wide Association Studies identified several new PACG loci and genes, which may shed light on the molecular mechanisms of PACG. The current classification systems of PACG remain controversial. Focusing the anterior chamber angle is a principal management strategy for PACG. Treatments to open the angle or halt the angle closure process such as laser peripheral iridotomy and/or iridoplasty, as well as cataract extraction, are proving their effectiveness. PACG may be preventable in the early stages if future research can identify which kind of angles and/or persons are more likely to benefit from prophylactic treatment. New treatment strategies like adjusting the psychological status and balancing the sympathetic-parasympathetic nerve activity, and innovative medicines are needed to improve the prognosis of PACG. In this review, we intend to describe current understanding and unknown aspects of PACG, and to share the clinical experience and viewpoints of the authors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genes and environment in refractive error: the twin eye study.

            A classical twin study was performed to examine the relative importance of genes and environment in refractive error. Refractive error was examined in 226 monozygotic (MZ) and 280 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs aged 49 to 79 years (mean age, 62.4 years). Using a Humphrey-670 automatic refractor, continuous measures of spherical equivalent, total astigmatism, and corneal astigmatism were recorded. Univariate and bivariate maximum likelihood model fitting was used to estimate genetic and environmental variance components using information from both eyes. For the continuous spectrum of myopia/hyperopia, a model specifying additive genetic and unique environmental factors showed the best fit to the data, yielding a heritability of 84% to 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-89%). If myopia and hyperopia ( or = 0.5 D, respectively) were treated as binary traits, the heritability was 90% (95% CI, 81%-95%) for myopia and 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%) for hyperopia. For total and corneal astigmatism, modeling showed dominant genetic effects are important; dominant genetic effects accounted for 47% to 49% of the variance of total astigmatism (95% CI, 37%-55%) and 42% to 61% of corneal astigmatism variance (95% CI, 8%-71%), with additive genetic factors accounting for 1% to 4% and 4% to 18%, respectively (95% CIs, 0%-13% and 0%-60%, respectively). Genetic effects are of major importance in myopia/hyperopia; astigmatism appears to be dominantly inherited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Myelin gene regulatory factor is required for maintenance of myelin and mature oligodendrocyte identity in the adult CNS.

              Although the transcription factors required for the generation of oligodendrocytes and CNS myelination during development have been relatively well established, it is not known whether continued expression of the same factors is required for the maintenance of myelin in the adult. Here, we use an inducible conditional knock-out strategy to investigate whether continued oligodendrocyte expression of the recently identified transcription factor myelin gene regulatory factor (MRF) is required to maintain the integrity of myelin in the adult CNS. Genetic ablation of MRF in mature oligodendrocytes within the adult CNS resulted in a delayed but severe CNS demyelination, with clinical symptoms beginning at 5 weeks and peaking at 8 weeks after ablation of MRF. This demyelination was accompanied by microglial/macrophage infiltration and axonal damage. Transcripts for myelin genes, such as proteolipid protein, MAG, MBP, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, were rapidly downregulated after ablation of MRF, indicating an ongoing requirement for MRF in the expression of these genes. Subsequently, a proportion of the recombined oligodendrocytes undergo apoptosis over a period of weeks. Surviving oligodendrocytes gradually lose the expression of mature markers such as CC1 antigen and their association with myelin, without reexpressing oligodendrocyte progenitor markers or reentering the cell cycle. These results demonstrate that ongoing expression of MRF within the adult CNS is critical to maintain mature oligodendrocyte identity and the integrity of CNS myelin.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (+86)-20-66677083 , zhangqji@mail.sysu.edu.cn , zhangqingjiong@gzzoc.com
                Journal
                Hum Genet
                Hum. Genet
                Human Genetics
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-6717
                1432-1203
                6 June 2019
                6 June 2019
                2019
                : 138
                : 10
                : 1077-1090
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2360 039X, GRID grid.12981.33, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, , Sun Yat-sen University, ; 54 Xianlie Road, Guangzhou, 510060 China
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7243, GRID grid.266093.8, Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, , University of California, ; Irvine, CA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2150 6316, GRID grid.280030.9, Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, , National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                Article
                2039
                10.1007/s00439-019-02039-z
                6745028
                31172260
                f7ef410c-bf7c-4105-8f0a-6577f995783d
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 26 February 2019
                : 4 June 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: the National Natural Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 30971588
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Science and Technology Planning Projects of Guangzhou
                Award ID: 201607020013
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology
                Categories
                Original Investigation
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article