56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide with uncertain medical consequences. Auditing and analysing caesarean section rates and other perinatal outcomes in a reliable and continuous manner is critical for understanding reasons caesarean section changes over time.

          Methods

          We analyzed data on 97,095 women delivering in 120 facilities in 8 countries, collected as part of the 2004-2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America. The objective of this analysis was to test if the "10-group" or "Robson" classification could help identify which groups of women are contributing most to the high caesarean section rates in Latin America, and if it could provide information useful for health care providers in monitoring and planning effective actions to reduce these rates.

          Results

          The overall rate of caesarean section was 35.4%. Women with single cephalic pregnancy at term without previous caesarean section who entered into labour spontaneously (groups 1 and 3) represented 60% of the total obstetric population. Although women with a term singleton cephalic pregnancy with a previous caesarean section (group 5) represented only 11.4% of the obstetric population, this group was the largest contributor to the overall caesarean section rate (26.7% of all the caesarean sections). The second and third largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were nulliparous women with single cephalic pregnancy at term either in spontaneous labour (group 1) or induced or delivered by caesarean section before labour (group 2), which were responsible for 18.3% and 15.3% of all caesarean deliveries, respectively.

          Conclusion

          The 10-group classification could be easily applied to a multicountry dataset without problems of inconsistencies or misclassification. Specific groups of women were clearly identified as the main contributors to the overall caesarean section rate. This classification could help health care providers to plan practical and effective actions targeting specific groups of women to improve maternal and perinatal care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

          To assess the risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery. Prospective cohort study within the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. 410 health facilities in 24 areas in eight randomly selected Latin American countries; 123 were randomly selected and 120 participated and provided data 106,546 deliveries reported during the three month study period, with data available for 97,095 (91% coverage). Maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with intrapartum or elective caesarean delivery, adjusted for clinical, demographic, pregnancy, and institutional characteristics. Women undergoing caesarean delivery had an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with women undergoing vaginal delivery (odds ratio 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.5) for intrapartum caesarean and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.1) for elective caesarean). The risk of antibiotic treatment after delivery for women having either type of caesarean was five times that of women having vaginal deliveries. With cephalic presentation, there was a trend towards a reduced odds ratio for fetal death with elective caesarean, after adjustment for possible confounding variables and gestational age (0.7, 0.4 to 1.0). With breech presentation, caesarean delivery had a large protective effect for fetal death. With cephalic presentation, however, independent of possible confounding variables and gestational age, intrapartum and elective caesarean increased the risk for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care (2.1 (1.8 to 2.6) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3), respectively) and the risk of neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge (1.7 (1.3 to 2.2) and 1.9 (1.5 to 2.6), respectively), which remained higher even after exclusion of all caesarean deliveries for fetal distress. Such increased risk was not seen for breech presentation. Lack of labour was a risk factor for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge for babies delivered by elective caesarean delivery, but rupturing of membranes may be protective. Caesarean delivery independently reduces overall risk in breech presentations and risk of intrapartum fetal death in cephalic presentations but increases the risk of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cephalic presentations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of caesarean sections

            MS Robson (2001)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

              To estimate the incidences of caesarean sections in Latin American countries and correlate these with socioeconomic, demographic, and healthcare variables. Descriptive and ecological study. 19 Latin American countries. National estimates of caesarean section rates in each country. Seven countries had caesarean section rates below 15%. The remaining 12 countries had rates above 15% (range 16.8% to 40.0%). These 12 countries account for 81% of the deliveries in the region. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the gross national product per capita and rate of caesarean section (r(s)=0.746), and higher rates were observed in private hospitals than in public ones. Taking 15% as a medically justified accepted rate, over 850 000 unnecessary caesarean sections are performed each year in the region. The reported figures represent an unnecessary increased risk for young women and their babies. From the economic perspective, this is a burden to health systems that work with limited budgets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central
                1742-4755
                2009
                29 October 2009
                : 6
                : 18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [2 ]National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                [3 ]Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina
                [4 ]Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [5 ]EngenderHealth, New York, USA
                [6 ]Fundación Salud, Ambiente y Desarrollo, Quito, Ecuador
                [7 ]Hospital Docente Ginecobstétrico "America Arias", La Habana, Cuba
                [8 ]Centro de Pesquisas em Saúde Reprodutiva de Campinas (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
                [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay
                [10 ]Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, León, Nicaragua
                [11 ]Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [12 ]Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru
                [13 ]The Population Council, Latin America Office, Mexico City, Mexico
                [14 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nacional de Itaguá, Asunción, Paraguay
                Article
                1742-4755-6-18
                10.1186/1742-4755-6-18
                2779175
                19874598
                f807584e-3d80-4da4-b605-46c1038449d1
                Copyright ©2009 Betrán et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 August 2009
                : 29 October 2009
                Categories
                Research

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Obstetrics & Gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article