18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Heterogeneity in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy with Biallelic Mutations in the BEST1 Gene

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) has been reported as clinically heterogeneous. Eighteen patients (mean age: 22.5 years; 15 unrelated families) underwent ophthalmological examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Molecular genetic testing of the BEST1 gene was conducted by the chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide Sanger methodology. Onset of symptoms (3 to 50 years of age) and best-corrected visual acuity (0.02–1.0) were highly variable. Ophthalmoscopic and retinal imaging defined five phenotypes. Phenotype I presented with single or confluent yellow lesions at the posterior pole and midperiphery, serous retinal detachment, and intraretinal cystoid spaces. In phenotype II fleck-like lesions were smaller and extended to the far periphery. Phenotype III showed a widespread continuous lesion with sharp peripheral demarcation. Single (phenotype IV) or multifocal (phenotype V) vitelliform macular dystrophy-like lesions were observed as well. Phenotypes varied within families and in two eyes of one patient. In addition, OCT detected hyperreflective foci (13/36 eyes) and choroidal excavation (11/36). Biallelic mutations were identified in each patient, six of which have not been reported so far [c.454C>T/p.(Pro152Ser), c.620T>A/p.(Leu207His), c.287_298del/p.(Gln96_Asn99del), c.199_200del/p.(Leu67Valfs*164), c.524del/p.(Ser175Thrfs*19), c.590_615del/p.(Leu197Profs*26)]. BEST1-associated ARB presents with a variable age of onset and clinical findings, that can be categorized in 5 clinical phenotypes. Hyperreflective foci and choroidal excavation frequently develop as secondary manifestations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update).

            This document, from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV), presents an updated and revised ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (ffERG or simply ERG). The parameters for Standard flash stimuli have been revised to accommodate a variety of light sources including gas discharge lamps and light emitting diodes. This ISCEV Standard for clinical ERGs specifies six responses based on the adaptation state of the eye and the flash strength: (1) Dark-adapted 0.01 ERG (rod ERG); (2) Dark-adapted 3 ERG (combined rod-cone standard flash ERG); (3) Dark-adapted 3 oscillatory potentials; (4) Dark-adapted 10 ERG (strong flash ERG); (5) Light-adapted 3 ERG (standard flash "cone" ERG); and (6) Light-adapted 30 Hz flicker ERG. ISCEV encourages the use of additional ERG protocols for testing beyond this minimum standard for clinical ERGs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition).

              The clinical multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is an electrophysiological test of local retinal function. With this technique, many local ERG responses are recorded quasi-simultaneously from the cone-driven retina under light-adapted conditions. This document, from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV: www.iscev.org ), replaces the ISCEV guidelines for the mfERG published in 2007. Standards for performance of the basic clinical mfERG test with a stimulus array of 61 or 103 hexagons, as well as for reporting the results, are specified.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                08 December 2020
                December 2020
                : 21
                : 24
                : 9353
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; hufendiek.katerina@ 123456mh-hannover.de (K.H.); framme.carsten@ 123456mh-hannover.de (C.F.)
                [2 ]Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; herbert.jaegle@ 123456ukr.de (H.J.); a.renner@ 123456berlin.de (A.B.R.)
                [3 ]Institut für Humangenetik, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; heidi.stoehr@ 123456klinik.uni-regensburg.de (H.S.); bweb@ 123456klinik.uni-regensburg.de (B.H.F.W.)
                [4 ]Augenzentrum am St. Franziskus-Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145 Münster, Germany; marius.gt.book@ 123456gmail.com (M.B.); georg.spital@ 123456augen-franziskus.de (G.S.)
                [5 ]Zarifa Aliyeva National Ophthalmology Centre, 32/15 Javadkhan Str., Baku AZ 1114, Azerbaijan; gunay.rustambayova@ 123456yahoo.com
                [6 ]Institut für Klinische Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
                [7 ]Augenarztpraxis Regensburg, Hoppestraße 5, 93049 Regensburg, Germany
                [8 ]Zentrum für Seltene Netzhauterkrankungen, AugenZentrum Siegburg, MVZ Augenärztliches Diagnostik- und Therapiecentrum Siegburg GmbH, Europaplatz 3, 53721 Siegburg, Germany
                [9 ]RetinaScience, Postfach 301212, 53192 Bonn, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: hufendiek.karsten@ 123456mh-hannover.de (K.H.); kellneru@ 123456mac.com (U.K.); Tel.: +49-(176)-15323146 (K.H.); +49-2241-844050 (U.K.)
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [‡]

                These authors should be considered shared senior authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-7844
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-3976
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-0731
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-8673
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-7723
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5221-4631
                Article
                ijms-21-09353
                10.3390/ijms21249353
                7763028
                33302512
                f8444840-c4af-4942-a63e-b1caaaedd6c1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 October 2020
                : 04 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (arb),inherited retinal dystrophy,best1,bestrophin-1,fundus autofluorescence,optical coherence tomography,phenotyping

                Comments

                Comment on this article