30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomised clinical trial of cryoballoon versus irrigated radio frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation—the effect of double short versus standard exposure cryoablation duration during pulmonary vein isolation (CIRCA-DOSE): methods and rationale

      protocol

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but it has limitations. The two most significant recent advances have centred on the integration of real-time quantitative assessment of catheter contact force into focal radio frequency (RF) ablation catheters and the development of dedicated ablation tools capable of achieving PVI with a single ablation lesion (Arctic Front cryoballoon, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Although each of these holds promise for improving the clinical success of catheter ablation of AF, there has not been a rigorous comparison of these advanced ablation technologies. Moreover, the optimal duration of cryoablation (freezing time) has not been determined.

          Methods and analysis

          Patients undergoing an initial PVI procedure for paroxysmal AF will be recruited. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 between contact-force irrigated RF ablation, short duration cryoballoon ablation (2 min applications) and standard duration cryoballoon ablation (4 min applications). The primary outcome is time to first documented AF recurrence on implantable loop recorder. With a sample size of 111 per group and a two-sided 0.025 significance level (to account for the two main comparisons), the study will have 80% power (using a log-rank test) to detect a difference of 20% between contact force RF catheter ablation and either of the two cryoballoon ablation groups. Factoring in a 4% loss to follow-up, 116 patients per group should be randomised and followed for a year (total study population of 348).

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study was approved by the University of British Columbia Office of Research (Services) Ethics Clinical Research Ethics Board. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

          Trial registration number

          NCT01913522; Pre-results

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial.

            Catheter ablation is important for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Limited animal and human studies suggest a correlation between electrode-tissue contact and radiofrequency lesion generation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.

              We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation. A total of 146 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 57+/-9 years who had chronic atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone and undergo two cardioversions during the first three months alone (the control group) or in combination with circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily telephonic transmissions for one year. The left atrial diameter and the severity of symptoms were assessed at 12 months. Among the 77 patients assigned to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation, ablation was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation in 26 percent of patients and atypical atrial flutter in 6 percent. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 74 percent of patients in the ablation group and 58 percent of those in the control group were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy at one year (P=0.05). Among the 69 patients in the control group, 53 (77 percent) crossed over to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation by one year and only 3 (4 percent) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or ablation. There were significant decreases in the left atrial diameter (12+/-11 percent, P<0.001) and the symptom severity score (59+/-21 percent, P<0.001) among patients who remained in sinus rhythm after circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Except for atypical atrial flutter, there were no complications attributable to circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Sinus rhythm can be maintained long term in the majority of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation independently of the effects of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy, cardioversion, or both. The maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with a significant decrease in both the severity of symptoms and the left atrial diameter. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2017
                5 October 2017
                : 7
                : 10
                : e017970
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute , Université de Montréal , British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , University of British Columbia , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , Universite Laval , Quebec, Canada
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , University of Western Ontario , London, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , Royal Jubilee Hospital , Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , Southlake Regional Health Centre , Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Medicine , University of Ottawa Heart Institute , Ottawa, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] and Dr Jason G Andrade; jason.andrade@ 123456vch.ca
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-017970
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017970
                5639989
                28982836
                f85863bc-e29d-45d6-a6fe-b5439e791d4c
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 30 May 2017
                : 21 August 2017
                : 29 August 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004411, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada;
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Protocol
                1506
                1683
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                atrial fibrillation,ablation,cryoablation
                Medicine
                atrial fibrillation, ablation, cryoablation

                Comments

                Comment on this article