33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Quantifying Artifacts in Ewald Simulations of Inhomogeneous Systems with a Net Charge.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ewald summation, which has become the de facto standard for computing electrostatic interactions in biomolecular simulations, formally requires that the simulation box is neutral. For non-neutral systems, the Ewald algorithm implicitly introduces a uniform background charge distribution that effectively neutralizes the simulation box. Because a uniform distribution of counter charges typically deviates from the spatial distribution of counterions in real systems, artifacts may arise, in particular in systems with an inhomogeneous dielectric constant. Here, we derive an analytical expression for the effect of using an implicit background charge instead of explicit counterions, on the chemical potential of ions in heterogeneous systems, which (i) provides a quantitative criterium for deciding if the background charge offers an acceptable trade-off between artifacts arising from sampling problems and artifacts arising from the homogeneous background charge distribution, and (ii) can be used to correct this artifact in certain cases. Our model quantifies the artifact in terms of the difference in charge density between the non-neutral system with a uniform neutralizing background charge and the real neutral system with a physically correct distribution of explicit counterions. We show that for inhomogeneous systems, such as proteins and membranes in water, the artifact manifests itself by an overstabilization of ions inside the lower dielectric by tens to even hundreds kilojoules per mole. We have tested the accuracy of our model in molecular dynamics simulations and found that the error in the calculated free energy for moving a test charge from water into hexadecane, at different net charges of the system and different simulation box sizes, is correctly predicted by the model. The calculations further confirm that the incorrect distribution of counter charges in the simulation box is solely responsible for the errors in the PMFs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Chem Theory Comput
          Journal of chemical theory and computation
          1549-9626
          1549-9618
          Jan 14 2014
          : 10
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute for Microbiology and Genetics Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
          [2 ] Computational biomolecular dynamics group, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
          [3 ] Department of Chemistry and Nanoscience Center University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
          Article
          10.1021/ct400626b
          26579917
          f858ddf9-cc10-4e39-ac14-ce5f0ee210ac
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article