3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Choosing an angiotensin-receptor blocker: blood pressure lowering, cardiovascular protection or both?

      1
      Future cardiology
      Future Medicine Ltd

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) offer superior tolerability to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and are increasingly used in patient management. ARBs vary in their pharmacological profiles, which results in efficacy differences. Therefore, deciding between ARBs should be evidence-based and related to the specific requirements of the individual patient. For patients with hypertension but at low additional risk, an ARB that provides sustained, powerful 24-h reductions in blood pressure is suitable. For patients at very high additional risk (with heart failure), an ARB with demonstrated efficacy in this patient population is the preferred option. For patients at increased risk, telmisartan should be the ARB of choice based on the results from the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End Point Trial (ONTARGET), which demonstrated for the first time that an ARB has equivalent protection to the reference angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in a broad cross-section of at-risk patients but a better side-effect profile.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Future Cardiol
          Future cardiology
          Future Medicine Ltd
          1744-8298
          1479-6678
          Jan 2010
          : 6
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Rødovre Centrum 294, DK-2610 Rødovre, Denmark. neldam@dadlnet.dk
          Article
          10.2217/fca.09.61
          20014992
          f85b017b-84e9-4dd1-b183-056628b294a5
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article