56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Short-term safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          On Dec 20, 2020, the Israeli Ministry of Health launched a national COVID-19 vaccination campaign that aimed to rapidly vaccinate all high-risk individuals by the end of January, 2021, using the Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.1, 2 Vaccines were readily available and free of charge. Patients with cancer who have been treated with systemic anticancer therapy are at a significantly increased risk of mortality from COVID-19,3, 4, 5, 6 and therefore should be considered as a high-priority group for COVID-19 vaccination. Because the pivotal vaccination study for BNT162b2 included only healthy individuals or those with stable chronic medical conditions, 1 a major obstacle faced by the Ministry of Health and by the National Council for the Prevention Diagnosis and Treatment of Malignant Disease was an absence of data regarding the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in patients with cancer who have been or are being treated. Based on available knowledge regarding other routinely used vaccines (eg, the influenza vaccine) the Ministry of Health recommended vaccination of all patients with cancer. 7 However, some experts at the National Council raised concerns regarding the ability of the vaccine to provoke or enhance immune-related side-effects in patients who are being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the Ministry of Health left the decision about vaccinating individuals treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to the discretion of their treating physician. The institutional policy of the Oncology Division at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (TLVMC) and at the Oncology Unit at Bnei-Zion Medical Center was to allow and encourage vaccination for all patients with cancer being actively treated, regardless of treatment type. Because COVID-19 is particularly dangerous to these susceptible patients, vaccination was encouraged regardless of disease stage, performance status, or life expectancy. Only patients previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or those with acute conditions (ie, active infection or active, uncontrolled immune-related side-effects) were excluded from the vaccination campaign. The vaccine was administered at the standard recommended dose on days 1 and 21. The second dose was omitted if the patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first dose. Due to the aforementioned safety concerns, side-effects among patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were monitored via detailed telephone questionnaires done 17–21 days after the first vaccine dose and at a median of 19 days (IQR 12–13) after the second vaccine dose. Here we report on the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at the two participating institutions. We compared side-effects in the patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors with a control group. At the beginning of the national campaign, all staff, including volunteers, at TLVMC were encouraged to receive the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and 2241 vaccinated staff members also participated in the side-effect survey. Each patient with cancer who had received the second vaccine dose was matched by sex and year of birth to a healthy individual from among the TLVSMC cohort. The only patient who was not matched by year of birth was aged 93 years, and they were matched with a TLVMC volunteer aged 89 years. Between Jan 11 and Feb 25, 2021, 170 patients who were being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were offered the vaccine and surveyed. 33 (19%) refused the vaccination, mostly due to fear of side-effects. 137 (81%) patients received the first vaccination dose, of whom 134 (98%) received the second dose. Three patients died after the first dose, one due to COVID-19, and two due to disease progression. Characteristics of the remaining 134 patients are presented in the appendix p 1. The most common side-effects after the first dose were local, with 28 (21%) of 134 patients reporting pain at the site of injection. Systemic side-effects included fatigue (five [4%]), headache (three [2%]), muscle pain (three [2%]), and chills (one [1%]). During the observation period after the second dose, four (3%) of 134 patients were admitted to hospital, three due to cancer-related complications and one due to fever, and all were discharged after treatment. As previously reported, 1 more systemic and local side-effects were observed after the second dose of vaccine than after the first dose. The most common local side-effects were pain at the injection site (85 [63%] of 134), local rash (three [2%]), and local swelling (12 [9%]), whereas the most common systemic side-effects were muscle pain (46 [34%]), fatigue (45 [34%]), headache (22 [16%]), fever (14 [10%]), chills (14 [10%]), gastrointestinal complications (14 [10%]), and flu-like symptoms (three [2%]; figure ; appendix p 2). None of the reported side-effects required admission to hospital or any other special intervention. Figure Systemic side-effects after the second dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine among patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and matched controls ICI=patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Bars show the proportion of participants reporting on each side-effect. Differences between the groups were calculated using the χ2 test. Most patients (116 [87%]) were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors alone and 18 (13%) were treated with a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy. A similar rate of systemic side-effects was observed in both treatment groups (37 [32%] of 116 vs eight [44%] of 18; χ2 test p=0·29). Most importantly, no new immune-related side-effects or exacerbation of existing immune-related side-effects were observed. The side-effect profile was similar in the healthy controls and the patients with cancer, apart from muscle pain, which was significantly more common among patients with cancer (figure). However, no immune-related myositis was diagnosed after the vaccine in either patients or controls. This observation further supports the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with cancer being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The potential association between previous immune-related side-effects and the vaccine side-effects was also examined. 72 (54%) of 134 patients had previously had grade 2 or worse immune checkpoint inhibitor-related side-effects before they had the vaccine. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who reported systematic side-effects after the second dose of vaccine between those who had reported previous immune-related side-effects and those who had not (24 [33%] of 72 vs 21 [34%] of 62; p=0·94). Importantly, even in patients with previous immune-related side-effects, the vaccine-related side-effects were mild and did not lead to admission to hospital or cessation of cancer treatment. Little data are available regarding the safety of various vaccines in the context of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but vaccination had generally been suggested to be safe in this population. 8 For example, the influenza vaccine was found to be safe in 370 patients with cancer actively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. 9 Our data support the short-term safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Because no vaccine-related or immune checkpoint inhibitor-related severe adverse events were observed in this cohort of 134 patients who received two doses of the vaccine, it is unlikely that any common side-effects were missed. However, rare side-effects might be identified when larger cohorts are investigated. Considering the high mortality of patients with cancer who contract COVID-19, which can be as high as 40% in some patient populations, 3 the benefits of vaccination seem to outweigh the potential harms. Although further studies are needed to determine if these data are also applicable to the other COVID-19 vaccines, our findings might provide some reassurance for their use in patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Obviously, larger studies over longer periods of follow-up are required to fully assess the benefits and harms of vaccines against COVID-19. However, the decision to vaccinate patients in regions severely affected by the pandemic cannot wait for the accumulating data from well designed, prospective clinical trials. Thus, despite the absence of evidence, the March 5, 2021, update of the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines state that “At this time, patients undergoing treatment may be offered vaccination against COVID-19 as long as any components of the vaccine are not contraindicated”. The data we present here provide, for the first time, a reassuring safety signal regarding the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Considering the high mortality due to COVID-19 in patients with cancer who are being treated, our data support current guidelines and call for vaccination of patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially during pandemic surges. IW and BW contributed to conception and design of the study. BW, AA, ES, and HP contributed to collection and analysis of data. BW and IW contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to writing of the Comment and approved the final version before submission. This study had no funding. BW reports speaker fees and fees for consultancy from MSD. AA reports speaker fees and fees for consultancy from MSD, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Oncotest-Teva, Medison, AbbVie, and Takeda; grants from Altman Health; and is a member of the board for the Israeli Lung Cancer Advocacy Group. IW reports speaker fees and fees for consultancy from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Novartis, and research funding from Roche and MSD. ES and HP declare no competing interests. No individual participant-level data will be shared.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study

            Summary Background Data on patients with COVID-19 who have cancer are lacking. Here we characterise the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors for mortality and severe illness. Methods In this cohort study, we collected de-identified data on patients with active or previous malignancy, aged 18 years and older, with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the USA, Canada, and Spain from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) database for whom baseline data were added between March 17 and April 16, 2020. We collected data on baseline clinical conditions, medications, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 disease course. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed the association between the outcome and potential prognostic variables using logistic regression analyses, partially adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and obesity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701, and is ongoing. Findings Of 1035 records entered into the CCC19 database during the study period, 928 patients met inclusion criteria for our analysis. Median age was 66 years (IQR 57–76), 279 (30%) were aged 75 years or older, and 468 (50%) patients were male. The most prevalent malignancies were breast (191 [21%]) and prostate (152 [16%]). 366 (39%) patients were on active anticancer treatment, and 396 (43%) had active (measurable) cancer. At analysis (May 7, 2020), 121 (13%) patients had died. In logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality, after partial adjustment, were: increased age (per 10 years; partially adjusted odds ratio 1·84, 95% CI 1·53–2·21), male sex (1·63, 1·07–2·48), smoking status (former smoker vs never smoked: 1·60, 1·03–2·47), number of comorbidities (two vs none: 4·50, 1·33–15·28), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (status of 2 vs 0 or 1: 3·89, 2·11–7·18), active cancer (progressing vs remission: 5·20, 2·77–9·77), and receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (vs treatment with neither: 2·93, 1·79–4·79; confounding by indication cannot be excluded). Compared with residence in the US-Northeast, residence in Canada (0·24, 0·07–0·84) or the US-Midwest (0·50, 0·28–0·90) were associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality. Race and ethnicity, obesity status, cancer type, type of anticancer therapy, and recent surgery were not associated with mortality. Interpretation Among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated with general risk factors and risk factors unique to patients with cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments. Funding American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study

              Summary Background Individuals with cancer, particularly those who are receiving systemic anticancer treatments, have been postulated to be at increased risk of mortality from COVID-19. This conjecture has considerable effect on the treatment of patients with cancer and data from large, multicentre studies to support this assumption are scarce because of the contingencies of the pandemic. We aimed to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics and COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. Methods In this prospective observational study, all patients with active cancer and presenting to our network of cancer centres were eligible for enrolment into the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP). The UKCCMP is the first COVID-19 clinical registry that enables near real-time reports to frontline doctors about the effects of COVID-19 on patients with cancer. Eligible patients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on RT-PCR assay from a nose or throat swab. We excluded patients with a radiological or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, without a positive RT-PCR test. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, or discharge from hospital, as assessed by the reporting sites during the patient hospital admission. Findings From March 18, to April 26, 2020, we analysed 800 patients with a diagnosis of cancer and symptomatic COVID-19. 412 (52%) patients had a mild COVID-19 disease course. 226 (28%) patients died and risk of death was significantly associated with advancing patient age (odds ratio 9·42 [95% CI 6·56–10·02]; p<0·0001), being male (1·67 [1·19–2·34]; p=0·003), and the presence of other comorbidities such as hypertension (1·95 [1·36–2·80]; p<0·001) and cardiovascular disease (2·32 [1·47–3·64]). 281 (35%) patients had received cytotoxic chemotherapy within 4 weeks before testing positive for COVID-19. After adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, chemotherapy in the past 4 weeks had no significant effect on mortality from COVID-19 disease, when compared with patients with cancer who had not received recent chemotherapy (1·18 [0·81–1·72]; p=0·380). We found no significant effect on mortality for patients with immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy use within the past 4 weeks. Interpretation Mortality from COVID-19 in cancer patients appears to be principally driven by age, gender, and comorbidities. We are not able to identify evidence that cancer patients on cytotoxic chemotherapy or other anticancer treatment are at an increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 disease compared with those not on active treatment. Funding University of Birmingham, University of Oxford.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lancet Oncol
                Lancet Oncol
                The Lancet. Oncology
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1470-2045
                1474-5488
                1 April 2021
                1 April 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
                [b ]Patient Safety and Quality, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
                [c ]Oncology Unit, Bnei Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
                [d ]Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
                Article
                S1470-2045(21)00155-8
                10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00155-8
                8016402
                33812495
                f89ff9fa-9c66-49cd-84ac-a301db22f8af
                © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Comment

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article