7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to colonoscopy in remote northern Canada: an analysis of cancellations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background: Colonoscopy is a critical diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that is challenging to access in northern Canada. In part, this is due to frequent cancellations. We sought to understand the trends and reasons for colonoscopy cancellations in the Northwest Territories (NWT).

          Methods: A retrospective review of colonoscopy cancellations January, 2018 to May, 2019 was conducted at Stanton Territorial Hospital, NWT. Cancellation details and rationale were captured from the endoscopy cancellation logs. Thematic analysis was used to group cancellation reasons. Descriptive statistics were generated, and trends were analysed using run chart.

          Results: Of the scheduled colonoscopies, 368(28%) were cancelled during the 16 month period, and cancellations occurred, on average, 27 days after booking. Cancellation reasons were grouped into 15 themes, encompassing personal, social, geographic and health system factors. The most frequently cited theme was work/other commitments (69 respondents; 24%). Cancellations due to travel and accommodation issues occurred more frequently in the winter.

          Conclusion: Over one in four booked colonoscopies were cancelled and the reasons for cancellations were complex. Initiatives focusing on communication and support for patients with personal or occupational obligations could dramatically reduce cancellations. Ongoing collaborative efforts are needed to inform and optimise access to colonoscopy in this region.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

          Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) may be achieved by the introduction of population-based screening programs. The aim of the systematic review was to update previous research to determine whether screening for CRC using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality and to consider the benefits, harms, and potential consequences of screening. We searched eight electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED, SIGLE, and HMIC). We identified nine articles describing four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving over 320,000 participants with follow-up ranging from 8 to 18 yr. The primary analyses used intention to screen and a secondary analysis adjusted for nonattendance. We calculated the relative risks and risk differences for each trial, and then overall, using fixed and random effects models. Combined results from the four eligible RCTs indicated that screening had a 16% reduction in the relative risk (RR) of CRC mortality (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.90). There was a 15% RR reduction (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92) in CRC mortality for studies that used biennial screening. When adjusted for screening attendance in the individual studies, there was a 25% RR reduction (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) for those attending at least one round of screening using the FOBT. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02) or all-cause mortality excluding CRC (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). The present review includes seven new publications and unpublished data concerning CRC screening using FOBT. This review confirms previous research demonstrating that FOBT screening reduces the risk of CRC mortality. The results also indicate that there is no difference in all-cause mortality between the screened and nonscreened populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why we don't come: patient perceptions on no-shows.

            Patients who schedule clinic appointments and fail to keep them have a negative impact on the workflow of a clinic in many ways. This study was conducted to identify the reasons patients in an urban family practice setting give for not keeping scheduled appointments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Residential schools and the effects on Indigenous health and well-being in Canada—a scoping review

              Background The history of residential schools has been identified as having long lasting and intergenerational effects on the physical and mental well-being of Indigenous populations in Canada. Our objective was to identify the extent and range of research on residential school attendance on specific health outcomes and the populations affected. Methods A scoping review of the empirical peer-reviewed literature was conducted, following the methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley (2005). For this review, nine databases were used: Bibliography of Native North Americans, Canadian Health Research Collection, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Indigenous Studies Portal, PubMed, Scopus, Statistics Canada, and Web of Science. Citations that did not focus on health and residential school among a Canadian Indigenous population were excluded. Papers were coded using the following categories: Indigenous identity group, geography, age-sex, residential school attendance, and health status. Results Sixty-one articles were selected for inclusion in the review. Most focused on the impacts of residential schooling among First Nations, but some included Métis and Inuit. Physical health outcomes linked to residential schooling included poorer general and self-rated health, increased rates of chronic and infectious diseases. Effects on mental and emotional well-being included mental distress, depression, addictive behaviours and substance mis-use, stress, and suicidal behaviours. Conclusion The empirical literature can be seen as further documenting the negative health effects of residential schooling, both among former residential school attendees and subsequent generations. Future empirical research should focus on developing a clearer understanding of the aetiology of these effects, and particularly on identifying the characteristics that lead people and communities to be resilient to them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Circumpolar Health
                Int J Circumpolar Health
                International Journal of Circumpolar Health
                Taylor & Francis
                1239-9736
                2242-3982
                20 September 2020
                2020
                : 79
                : 1
                : 1816678
                Affiliations
                [a ]Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa; , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [b ]Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine; , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [c ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [d ]Department of General Surgery, Stanton Territorial Health Authority; , Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
                [e ]Office of Research Services, MacEwan University; , Edmonton, AB, Canada
                Author notes
                CONTACT Heather Smith hsmit037@ 123456uottawa.ca Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa; , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [*]

                equal contribution

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7736-4641
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1088-5135
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7864-8048
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-5515
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-5372
                Article
                1816678
                10.1080/22423982.2020.1816678
                7534278
                33290187
                f8c097c8-07f1-41e1-9fd1-9b1af551695c
                © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, References: 41, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Research Article
                Original Research Article

                Medicine
                healthcare access,rural and remote health,colonoscopy,cancellations
                Medicine
                healthcare access, rural and remote health, colonoscopy, cancellations

                Comments

                Comment on this article