19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Detection of the anti-androgenic effect of endocrine disrupting environmental contaminants using in vivo and in vitro assays in the three-spined stickleback.

      Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
      Adrenergic Antagonists, toxicity, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Endocrine Disruptors, Female, Fish Proteins, analysis, genetics, Fresh Water, Gene Expression Regulation, drug effects, Smegmamorpha, physiology, Water Pollutants, Chemical

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We have previously developed a novel in vitro assay that utilises cultures of primed female stickleback kidney cells for the screening of potential androgenic and anti-androgenic environmental contaminants. Stickleback kidney cells are natural targets for steroid hormones and are able to produce a protein, spiggin, in response to androgenic stimulation. We undertook a combined in vivo/in vitro study where we used the magnitude of spiggin production as an endpoint to test the anti-androgenic properties of the pharmaceutical androgen antagonist flutamide and three environmental contaminants: the organophosphate insecticide fenitrothion, the urea-based herbicide linuron and the fungicide vinclozolin. In vitro, kidney cells were exposed to a range of concentrations [from 10(-14) M (2.5 pg/L) up to 10(-6) M (280 microg/L)] of the test compounds alone for determining agonist activities, or together with 10(-8) M (3 microg/L) dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for determining antagonist activities. An in vivo flow-through aquarium-based study was carried out in parallel. Female sticklebacks were exposed to a range of concentrations of the same chemicals alone or in combination with DHT (5 microg/L) for 21 days. All of the compounds significantly inhibited DHT-induced spiggin production in a concentration-dependent manner in both the in vitro (FN > or = FL > or = LN > VZ) and in vivo (FN > FL > or = VZ > LN) assays. Fenitrothion and flutamide inhibited spiggin production in vitro at a concentration as low as 10(-12) M (P < 0.05), while linuron and vinclozolin inhibited DHT-induced spiggin production at concentrations of 10(-10) M (P < 0.05) and 10(-6) M (P < 0.001) respectively. Similarly, fenitrothion and flutamide were the most potent chemicals in vivo and significantly reduced DHT-induced spiggin production at a concentration of 10 microg/L and 25 microg/L respectively (P < 0.01). Both linuron and vinclozolin induced a significant decrease in DHT-induced spiggin production at a concentration of 100 microg/L when tested in vivo. In addition, kidney cell primary culture was used to test the (anti-)androgenic effects of the major environmental contaminants: oestradiol (E2), nonylphenol (NP) and bisphenol A (BPA) for the first time in teleosts. We observed that these compounds were able to significantly inhibit spiggin production at high doses (E2: 270 microg/L; NP: 2.2 microg/L; BPA: 2.3 microg/L). When tested in the absence of DHT, none of the compounds showed a significant agonistic activity in either in vivo or in vitro assays. Overall, our data further demonstrate that kidney cell primary culture is a reliable and a sensitive screening tool for the detection of (anti-)androgenic compounds. In addition, our study represents the first attempt to develop a combined in vivo/in vitro screening strategy for assessing the effects of (anti-)androgenic endocrine disrupters.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article