7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the evolutionary origins of equity

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , 2 , 1 , 3
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Equity, defined as reward according to contribution, is considered a central aspect of human fairness in both philosophical debates and scientific research. Despite large amounts of research on the evolutionary origins of fairness, the evolutionary rationale behind equity is still unknown. Here, we investigate how equity can be understood in the context of the cooperative environment in which humans evolved. We model a population of individuals who cooperate to produce and divide a resource, and choose their cooperative partners based on how they are willing to divide the resource. Agent-based simulations, an analytical model, and extended simulations using neural networks provide converging evidence that equity is the best evolutionary strategy in such an environment: individuals maximize their fitness by dividing benefits in proportion to their own and their partners’ relative contribution. The need to be chosen as a cooperative partner thus creates a selection pressure strong enough to explain the evolution of preferences for equity. We discuss the limitations of our model, the discrepancies between its predictions and empirical data, and how interindividual and intercultural variability fit within this framework.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.

            Researchers from across the social sciences have found consistent deviations from the predictions of the canonical model of self-interest in hundreds of experiments from around the world. This research, however, cannot determine whether the uniformity results from universal patterns of human behavior or from the limited cultural variation available among the university students used in virtually all prior experimental work. To address this, we undertook a cross-cultural study of behavior in ultimatum, public goods, and dictator games in a range of small-scale societies exhibiting a wide variety of economic and cultural conditions. We found, first, that the canonical model - based on self-interest - fails in all of the societies studied. Second, our data reveal substantially more behavioral variability across social groups than has been found in previous research. Third, group-level differences in economic organization and the structure of social interactions explain a substantial portion of the behavioral variation across societies: the higher the degree of market integration and the higher the payoffs to cooperation in everyday life, the greater the level of prosociality expressed in experimental games. Fourth, the available individual-level economic and demographic variables do not consistently explain game behavior, either within or across groups. Fifth, in many cases experimental play appears to reflect the common interactional patterns of everyday life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              New directions in equity research.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2017
                21 March 2017
                : 12
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Biologie de l’Ecole normale supérieure (IBENS), INSERM 1024, CNRS 8197, Ecole normale supérieure - PSL Research University, Paris, France
                [2 ]Institut Jean-Nicod (CNRS - EHESS - ENS), Département d’Etudes Cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure - PSL Research University, Paris, France
                [3 ]Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution, UMR 5554 - CNRS – Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France
                Tianjin University of Technology, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: SD NB JBA.

                • Data curation: SD.

                • Formal analysis: SD JBA.

                • Funding acquisition: SD NB JBA.

                • Investigation: SD.

                • Methodology: SD JBA.

                • Project administration: NB JBA.

                • Software: SD JBA.

                • Supervision: NB JBA.

                • Validation: SD NB JBA.

                • Visualization: SD.

                • Writing – original draft: SD.

                • Writing – review & editing: SD NB JBA.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-49032
                10.1371/journal.pone.0173636
                5360236
                28323830
                f8d71b92-f1f7-43e6-abb2-589eec82413e
                © 2017 Debove et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 16
                Product
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Région Ile-de-France
                Award ID: 2012 DIM "Problématiques transversales aux systémes complexes"
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the Région Ile-de-France (2012 DIM "Problématiques transversales aux systèmes complexes”), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*), the Institut des systèmes complexes, and the Ecole Doctorale Frontières du Vivant (FdV) - Programme Bettencourt. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neural Networks
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Processes
                Natural Selection
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Agent-Based Modeling
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Systems Science
                Agent-Based Modeling
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Systems Science
                Agent-Based Modeling
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Decision Making
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Applied Mathematics
                Algorithms
                Evolutionary Algorithms
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Algorithms
                Evolutionary Algorithms
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Computational Techniques
                Evolutionary Computation
                Evolutionary Algorithms
                Custom metadata
                Data is available on figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4721425.v1.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article