33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human–Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          One of the main challenges when integrating biological and social perspectives in primatology is overcoming interdisciplinary barriers. Unfamiliarity with subject-specific theory and language, distinct disciplinary-bound approaches to research, and academic boundaries aimed at “preserving the integrity” of subject disciplines can hinder developments in interdisciplinary research. With growing interest in how humans and other primates share landscapes, and recognition of the importance of combining biological and social information to do this effectively, the disparate use of terminology is becoming more evident. To tackle this problem, we dissect the meaning of what the biological sciences term studies in “human–wildlife conflict” or more recently “human–wildlife interactions” and compare it to what anthropology terms “multispecies ethnography.” In the biological sciences, human–wildlife interactions are the actions resulting from people and wild animals sharing landscapes and resources, with outcomes ranging from being beneficial or harmful to one or both species. In the social sciences, human–nonhuman relationships have been explored on a philosophical, analytical, and empirical level. Building on previous work, we advocate viewing landscapes through an interdisciplinary “multispecies lens” in which humans are observed as one of multiple organisms that interact with other species to shape and create environments. To illustrate these interconnections we use the case study of coexistence between people of the Nalu ethnic group and Critically Endangered western chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes verus) at Cantanhez National Park in Guinea-Bissau, to demonstrate how biological and social research approaches can be complementary and can inform conservation initiatives at the human–primate interface. Finally, we discuss how combining perspectives from ethnoprimatology with those from multispecies ethnography can advance the study of ethnoprimatology to aid productive discourse and enhance future interdisciplinary research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references130

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change

          Almost all organisms live in environments that have been altered, to some degree, by human activities. Because behaviour mediates interactions between an individual and its environment, the ability of organisms to behave appropriately under these new conditions is crucial for determining their immediate success or failure in these modified environments. While hundreds of species are suffering dramatically from these environmental changes, others, such as urbanized and pest species, are doing better than ever. Our goal is to provide insights into explaining such variation. We first summarize the responses of some species to novel situations, including novel risks and resources, habitat loss/fragmentation, pollutants and climate change. Using a sensory ecology approach, we present a mechanistic framework for predicting variation in behavioural responses to environmental change, drawing from models of decision-making processes and an understanding of the selective background against which they evolved. Where immediate behavioural responses are inadequate, learning or evolutionary adaptation may prove useful, although these mechanisms are also constrained by evolutionary history. Although predicting the responses of species to environmental change is difficult, we highlight the need for a better understanding of the role of evolutionary history in shaping individuals’ responses to their environment and provide suggestion for future work.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rethinking Community-Based Conservation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Conservation and the Social Sciences

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hparathian@fcsh.unl.pt
                K.Hockings@exeter.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Primatol
                Int. J. Primatol
                International Journal of Primatology
                Springer US (New York )
                0164-0291
                18 April 2018
                18 April 2018
                2018
                : 39
                : 5
                : 749-775
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1925 7621, GRID grid.421643.6, Centre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA-FCSH/NOVA), ; 1069-061 Lisbon, Portugal
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0726 8331, GRID grid.7628.b, Anthropology Centre for Conservation, Environment and Development, Department of Social Sciences, , Oxford Brookes University, ; Oxford, OX3 0BP UK
                [3 ]Bulindi Chimpanzee and Community Project, P.O. Box 245, Hoima, Uganda
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000121511713, GRID grid.10772.33, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, , New University of Lisbon, ; Lisbon, 1069-061 Portugal
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8024, GRID grid.8391.3, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, , University of Exeter, ; Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE UK
                Author notes

                Handling Editor: Erin P. Riley

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-644X
                Article
                27
                10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9
                6267646
                f92b74f4-46e4-4c50-8a95-87f33c8c7309
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 7 July 2017
                : 1 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia;
                Award ID: IF/01128/2014
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000275, Leverhulme Trust;
                Funded by: Centre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA- FCSH/NOVA)
                Award ID: None
                Funded by: ARCUS
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Animal science & Zoology
                conservation conflict,ethnoprimatology,human–wildlife conflict,human–wildlife interactions,interdisciplinary research,multispecies ethnography,primate conservation

                Comments

                Comment on this article