0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      TSH and PRL Responses to Domperidone and TRH in Men with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus of Different Duration

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effect of domperidone, a specific blocker of dopamine receptors, on serum TSH and PRL levels was evaluated in 16 euthyroid men affected by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of different duration and in 7 age-matched normal controls. Diabetics were divided into 2 groups of 8 men according to the duration of their disease (group I: 1-9 years; group II: 11-18 years). Both groups had normal basal levels of TSH and PRL. Responses of these hormones to domperidone were similar in normal controls and in group I diabetics, whereas they were significantly reduced in patients of group II. When all 16 diabetics were studied together, a significant negative correlation was found between mean maximal peaks of TSH and PRL responses to domperidone and duration of diabetes. In order to evaluate whether the reduced effect of domperidone in diabetics was due to alterations of the dopaminergic control of TSH and PRL secretion, the domperidone test was repeated in 6 normal controls and in 6 diabetics of group II after infusion of dopamine (4 µg/kg/min for 2 h). Dopamine infusion induced parallel decreases in TSH and PRL concentrations, without modifying hormonal secretory patterns in response to domperidone. These data suggested that the reduced TSH and PRL responses to domperidone in diabetics were not due to alterations of the dopaminergic control of pituitary function but to a defect at the pituitary level. To test this hypothesis, TSH and PRL responses to TRH were evaluated in group I and group II diabetics and in normal controls. Results showed reduced TSH and PRL responses in diabetics of group II, but not in those of group I; when all 16 diabetics were studied together, a significant negative correlation was found between maximal peaks of TSH and PRL responses to TRH and duration of diabetes. These data indicate that the acute releasing pools of both TSH and PRL are reduced with time after the onset of IDDM.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          HRE
          Horm Res Paediatr
          10.1159/issn.1663-2818
          Hormone Research in Paediatrics
          S. Karger AG
          1663-2818
          1663-2826
          1987
          1987
          28 November 2008
          : 25
          : 4
          : 206-214
          Affiliations
          a Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale, e bCattedra di Endocrinologia e Patologia Costituzionale, Università di Parma, Italia; cDivisione di Medicina Generale, Ospedale di Codogno, Italia
          Article
          180654 Horm Res 1987;25:206–214
          10.1159/000180654
          3108134
          © 1987 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article