2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents/carers of children

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim:

          The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of community-based health literacy interventions in improving the health literacy of parents.

          Methods:

          A systematic review of six databases – MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Education Source – was conducted to identify relevant articles. Risk of bias was assessed using version two of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials or the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The study findings were grouped and synthesised following the synthesis without meta-analysis framework.

          Results:

          Eleven community-based health literacy interventions for parents were identified. Study design included randomised controlled trials ( n = 4), non-randomised studies with comparison group ( n = 4), and non-randomised studies without a comparison group ( n = 3). Interventions were delivered digitally, in person or a combination of the two. The risk of bias was high in over half the studies ( n = 7). The main findings of the studies showed some potential for both in person and digital interventions to increase parental health literacy. Studies were heterogeneous preventing a meta-analysis.

          Conclusion:

          Community-based, health literacy interventions have been identified as potential methods for enhancing parental health literacy. Due to the small number of included studies and their potential for bias, these results must be interpreted with caution. This study emphasises the need for additional theory and evidence-based research on the long-term effects of community interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

          <i>Statistical Power Analysis</i> is a nontechnical guide to power analysis in research planning that provides users of applied statistics with the tools they need for more effective analysis. The Second Edition includes: <br> * a chapter covering power analysis in set correlation and multivariate methods;<br> * a chapter considering effect size, psychometric reliability, and the efficacy of "qualifying" dependent variables and;<br> * expanded power and sample size tables for multiple regression/correlation.<br>
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

            In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World

              Electronic health tools provide little value if the intended users lack the skills to effectively engage them. With nearly half the adult population in the United States and Canada having literacy levels below what is needed to fully engage in an information-rich society, the implications for using information technology to promote health and aid in health care, or for eHealth, are considerable. Engaging with eHealth requires a skill set, or literacy, of its own. The concept of eHealth literacy is introduced and defined as the ability to seek, find, understand, and appraise health information from electronic sources and apply the knowledge gained to addressing or solving a health problem. In this paper, a model of eHealth literacy is introduced, comprised of multiple literacy types, including an outline of a set of fundamental skills consumers require to derive direct benefits from eHealth. A profile of each literacy type with examples of the problems patient-clients might present is provided along with a resource list to aid health practitioners in supporting literacy improvement with their patient-clients across each domain. Facets of the model are illustrated through a set of clinical cases to demonstrate how health practitioners can address eHealth literacy issues in clinical or public health practice. Potential future applications of the model are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Perspect Public Health
                Perspect Public Health
                RSH
                sprsh
                Perspectives in Public Health
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1757-9139
                1757-9147
                29 June 2023
                January 2025
                : 145
                : 1
                : 25-31
                Affiliations
                [1-17579139231180746]University of Winchester, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK
                [2-17579139231180746]University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
                [3-17579139231180746]University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
                [4-17579139231180746]Southampton Children’s Hospital, Southampton, UK
                [5-17579139231180746]University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Samantha L Belfrage, University of Winchester, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK Email: s.belfrage.20@ 123456unimail.winchester.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-2829
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
                Article
                10.1177_17579139231180746
                10.1177/17579139231180746
                11800687
                37381897
                f961445f-fcef-41fb-ab30-86106d5c9cd5
                © Royal Society for Public Health 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Care Research, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272;
                Award ID: PhD Scholarship
                Categories
                Peer Review
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                health literacy,systematic review,health improvement,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article