75
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Validation Study of the Accuracy of Echocardiographic Measurements of Systemic Blood Flow Volume in Newborn Infants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The echocardiographic assessment of circulatory function in sick newborn infants has the potential to improve patient care. However, measurements are prone to error and have not been sufficiently validated. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides highly validated measures of blood flow and has recently been applied to the newborn population. The aim of this study was to validate measures of left ventricular output and superior vena caval flow volume in newborn infants.

          Methods

          Echocardiographic and MRI assessments were performed within 1 working day of each other in a cohort of newborn infants.

          Results

          Examinations were performed in 49 infants with a median corrected gestational age at scan of 34.43 weeks (range, 27.43–40 weeks) and a median weight at scan of 1,880 g (range, 660–3,760 g). Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular output showed a strong correlation with MRI assessment ( R 2 = 0.83; mean bias, −9.6 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, −79.6 to +60.0 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 28.2%). Echocardiographic assessment of superior vena caval flow showed a poor correlation with MRI assessment ( R 2 = 0.22; mean bias, −13.7 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, −89.1 to +61.7 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 68.0%). Calculating superior vena caval flow volume from an axial area measurement and applying a 50% reduction to stroke distance to compensate for overestimation gave a slightly improved correlation with MRI ( R 2 = 0.29; mean bias, 2.6 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, −53.4 to +58.6 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 54.5%).

          Conclusions

          Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular output appears relatively robust in newborn infant. Echocardiographic assessment of superior vena caval flow is of limited accuracy in this population, casting doubt on the utility of the measurement for diagnostic decision making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Towards rational management of the patent ductus arteriosus: the need for disease staging.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: practice guidelines and recommendations for training. Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) in collaboration with the European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) and the Association for European Pediatric Cardiologists (AEPC).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Soc Echocardiogr
                J Am Soc Echocardiogr
                Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
                Mosby-Year Book
                0894-7317
                1097-6795
                1 December 2013
                December 2013
                : 26
                : 12
                : 1365-1371
                Affiliations
                [a ]Imperial College and MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, London, United Kingdom
                [b ]Patologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy
                [c ]Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                []Reprint requests: Alan M. Groves, MD, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. alan.groves@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Article
                S0894-7317(13)00661-5
                10.1016/j.echo.2013.08.019
                3852205
                24075229
                f9952930-25ae-406f-b390-611bd3133bb8
                © 2013 Mosby, Inc.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                Categories
                Clinical Investigation
                Cardiovascular Disease in Neonates and Children

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                svc, superior vena caval,loa, limits of agreement,echocardiography,ri, repeatability index,phase-contrast mri,mri, magnetic resonance imaging,preterm infants,pc, phase-contrast,lvo, left ventricular output,vti, velocity-time integral

                Comments

                Comment on this article